Cargando…

Comparative effects of intensive ganglionated plexus ablation in treating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and vasovagal syncope

BACKGROUND: Ganglionated plexus (GP) ablation is used to treat atrial fibrillation (AF) and vasovagal syncope (VVS). However, the comparative effects of GP ablation in treating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) and VVS have not been well studied. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to invest...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Xingfu, Chen, Yanjia, Huang, Yuli, Zhao, Hongxin, He, Liwei, Tan, Zhenni, Xu, Dingli, Peng, Jian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7661657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32808295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23446
_version_ 1783609243295809536
author Huang, Xingfu
Chen, Yanjia
Huang, Yuli
Zhao, Hongxin
He, Liwei
Tan, Zhenni
Xu, Dingli
Peng, Jian
author_facet Huang, Xingfu
Chen, Yanjia
Huang, Yuli
Zhao, Hongxin
He, Liwei
Tan, Zhenni
Xu, Dingli
Peng, Jian
author_sort Huang, Xingfu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ganglionated plexus (GP) ablation is used to treat atrial fibrillation (AF) and vasovagal syncope (VVS). However, the comparative effects of GP ablation in treating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) and VVS have not been well studied. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of intensive GP ablation on PAF and VVS. METHODS: PAF and VVS patients were enrolled in this study. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed in the PAF group, and additional ablation was performed at GP sites. Anatomic ablation of left atrial GPs was performed in the VVS group. The primary endpoint was freedom from AF or other sustained atrial tachycardia and syncope recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 195 patients were enrolled: 146 patients with PAF, including eight patients with combined VVS (PAF group), and 49 patients with VVS (VVS group). Vasovagal response (VR) was achieved in 78 (53.4%) patients in the PAF group and 48 patients (98.0%) in the VVS group (P < .05). During the 17.8 ± 10.5 (range, 3‐42) month follow‐up, 126 (86.3%) patients were free of AF in the PAF group, and 45 (91.8%) patients in the VVS group had no syncope recurrence and significantly improved symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomically guided intensive GP ablation showed efficient clinical outcomes for both groups of patients. Compared with PAF patients, VVS patients had more VR during ablation in the left atrium. Furthermore, VR during ablation indicated a better prognosis in PAF patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7661657
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76616572020-11-17 Comparative effects of intensive ganglionated plexus ablation in treating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and vasovagal syncope Huang, Xingfu Chen, Yanjia Huang, Yuli Zhao, Hongxin He, Liwei Tan, Zhenni Xu, Dingli Peng, Jian Clin Cardiol Clinical Investigations BACKGROUND: Ganglionated plexus (GP) ablation is used to treat atrial fibrillation (AF) and vasovagal syncope (VVS). However, the comparative effects of GP ablation in treating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) and VVS have not been well studied. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of intensive GP ablation on PAF and VVS. METHODS: PAF and VVS patients were enrolled in this study. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed in the PAF group, and additional ablation was performed at GP sites. Anatomic ablation of left atrial GPs was performed in the VVS group. The primary endpoint was freedom from AF or other sustained atrial tachycardia and syncope recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 195 patients were enrolled: 146 patients with PAF, including eight patients with combined VVS (PAF group), and 49 patients with VVS (VVS group). Vasovagal response (VR) was achieved in 78 (53.4%) patients in the PAF group and 48 patients (98.0%) in the VVS group (P < .05). During the 17.8 ± 10.5 (range, 3‐42) month follow‐up, 126 (86.3%) patients were free of AF in the PAF group, and 45 (91.8%) patients in the VVS group had no syncope recurrence and significantly improved symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomically guided intensive GP ablation showed efficient clinical outcomes for both groups of patients. Compared with PAF patients, VVS patients had more VR during ablation in the left atrium. Furthermore, VR during ablation indicated a better prognosis in PAF patients. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2020-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7661657/ /pubmed/32808295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23446 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigations
Huang, Xingfu
Chen, Yanjia
Huang, Yuli
Zhao, Hongxin
He, Liwei
Tan, Zhenni
Xu, Dingli
Peng, Jian
Comparative effects of intensive ganglionated plexus ablation in treating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and vasovagal syncope
title Comparative effects of intensive ganglionated plexus ablation in treating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and vasovagal syncope
title_full Comparative effects of intensive ganglionated plexus ablation in treating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and vasovagal syncope
title_fullStr Comparative effects of intensive ganglionated plexus ablation in treating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and vasovagal syncope
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effects of intensive ganglionated plexus ablation in treating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and vasovagal syncope
title_short Comparative effects of intensive ganglionated plexus ablation in treating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and vasovagal syncope
title_sort comparative effects of intensive ganglionated plexus ablation in treating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and vasovagal syncope
topic Clinical Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7661657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32808295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23446
work_keys_str_mv AT huangxingfu comparativeeffectsofintensiveganglionatedplexusablationintreatingparoxysmalatrialfibrillationandvasovagalsyncope
AT chenyanjia comparativeeffectsofintensiveganglionatedplexusablationintreatingparoxysmalatrialfibrillationandvasovagalsyncope
AT huangyuli comparativeeffectsofintensiveganglionatedplexusablationintreatingparoxysmalatrialfibrillationandvasovagalsyncope
AT zhaohongxin comparativeeffectsofintensiveganglionatedplexusablationintreatingparoxysmalatrialfibrillationandvasovagalsyncope
AT heliwei comparativeeffectsofintensiveganglionatedplexusablationintreatingparoxysmalatrialfibrillationandvasovagalsyncope
AT tanzhenni comparativeeffectsofintensiveganglionatedplexusablationintreatingparoxysmalatrialfibrillationandvasovagalsyncope
AT xudingli comparativeeffectsofintensiveganglionatedplexusablationintreatingparoxysmalatrialfibrillationandvasovagalsyncope
AT pengjian comparativeeffectsofintensiveganglionatedplexusablationintreatingparoxysmalatrialfibrillationandvasovagalsyncope