Cargando…

XEN gel implant with or without phacoemulsification for glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: XEN gel implant is an alternative method of treating glaucoma by connecting the anterior chamber and the subconjunctival space. The efficacy of the XEN gel implant and whether to combine with phacoemulsification is what most concerned. This review aims to test the efficacy and safety of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Bo, Leng, Xiangjie, An, Xuemei, Zhang, Xiwen, Liu, Xiang, Lu, Xuejing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7661862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33209889
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-6354
_version_ 1783609283901915136
author Wang, Bo
Leng, Xiangjie
An, Xuemei
Zhang, Xiwen
Liu, Xiang
Lu, Xuejing
author_facet Wang, Bo
Leng, Xiangjie
An, Xuemei
Zhang, Xiwen
Liu, Xiang
Lu, Xuejing
author_sort Wang, Bo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: XEN gel implant is an alternative method of treating glaucoma by connecting the anterior chamber and the subconjunctival space. The efficacy of the XEN gel implant and whether to combine with phacoemulsification is what most concerned. This review aims to test the efficacy and safety of the XEN gel implant compared with trabeculectomy and to test the efficacy between XEN combined with phacoemulsification and XEN alone. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through July 8, 2020. Studies comparing XEN and trabeculectomy or comparing XEN + phacoemulsification and XEN alone were included. The standard mean differences (SMD) were calculated to analyze the lowered intraocular pressure (IOP) and the number of anti-glaucoma medications. All data were measured from baseline to endpoint. The I2 statistic quantified heterogeneity ranged from 0% to 100%, and a random effects model was used in this meta-analysis. Review Manager 5.3 performed all analyses. The t-test calculated all P values, and P values were regarded as statistically significant at P<0.05. The methodological index for non-randomized studies was used to find and test bias in the literature. RESULTS: Twelve studies with 1,602 eyes were included. Five studies compared the XEN gel implant with trabeculectomy. Eight compared XEN + phacoemulsification with XEN alone. There was no significant correlation between XEN and trabeculectomy groups in lowering IOP (SMD 0.30, 95% CI, 0.00 to 0.60, I(2)=60%) and reduced the number of IOP lowering drugs (SMD 0.01, 95% CI, –0.16 to 0.17, I(2)=0%). There was a significant difference between XEN + phacoemulsification and XEN alone in lowering IOP (1,034 eyes, SMD 0.22, 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.40, I(2)=38%) and reducing the number of medications (729 eyes, SMD 0.20, 95% CI, –0.06 to 0.46, I(2)=62%). CONCLUSIONS: XEN gel implant, although not effective as trabeculectomy, is a safe operation for open-angle and some other types of glaucoma. Meanwhile, XEN alone is more effective than XEN combined with phacoemulsification within 1 week after operations. After three months, the two groups are similar in lowering IOP. More extensive, better-designed, strictly blinded, multicenter randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm our findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7661862
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76618622020-11-17 XEN gel implant with or without phacoemulsification for glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis Wang, Bo Leng, Xiangjie An, Xuemei Zhang, Xiwen Liu, Xiang Lu, Xuejing Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: XEN gel implant is an alternative method of treating glaucoma by connecting the anterior chamber and the subconjunctival space. The efficacy of the XEN gel implant and whether to combine with phacoemulsification is what most concerned. This review aims to test the efficacy and safety of the XEN gel implant compared with trabeculectomy and to test the efficacy between XEN combined with phacoemulsification and XEN alone. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through July 8, 2020. Studies comparing XEN and trabeculectomy or comparing XEN + phacoemulsification and XEN alone were included. The standard mean differences (SMD) were calculated to analyze the lowered intraocular pressure (IOP) and the number of anti-glaucoma medications. All data were measured from baseline to endpoint. The I2 statistic quantified heterogeneity ranged from 0% to 100%, and a random effects model was used in this meta-analysis. Review Manager 5.3 performed all analyses. The t-test calculated all P values, and P values were regarded as statistically significant at P<0.05. The methodological index for non-randomized studies was used to find and test bias in the literature. RESULTS: Twelve studies with 1,602 eyes were included. Five studies compared the XEN gel implant with trabeculectomy. Eight compared XEN + phacoemulsification with XEN alone. There was no significant correlation between XEN and trabeculectomy groups in lowering IOP (SMD 0.30, 95% CI, 0.00 to 0.60, I(2)=60%) and reduced the number of IOP lowering drugs (SMD 0.01, 95% CI, –0.16 to 0.17, I(2)=0%). There was a significant difference between XEN + phacoemulsification and XEN alone in lowering IOP (1,034 eyes, SMD 0.22, 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.40, I(2)=38%) and reducing the number of medications (729 eyes, SMD 0.20, 95% CI, –0.06 to 0.46, I(2)=62%). CONCLUSIONS: XEN gel implant, although not effective as trabeculectomy, is a safe operation for open-angle and some other types of glaucoma. Meanwhile, XEN alone is more effective than XEN combined with phacoemulsification within 1 week after operations. After three months, the two groups are similar in lowering IOP. More extensive, better-designed, strictly blinded, multicenter randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm our findings. AME Publishing Company 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7661862/ /pubmed/33209889 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-6354 Text en 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Wang, Bo
Leng, Xiangjie
An, Xuemei
Zhang, Xiwen
Liu, Xiang
Lu, Xuejing
XEN gel implant with or without phacoemulsification for glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title XEN gel implant with or without phacoemulsification for glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full XEN gel implant with or without phacoemulsification for glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr XEN gel implant with or without phacoemulsification for glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed XEN gel implant with or without phacoemulsification for glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short XEN gel implant with or without phacoemulsification for glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort xen gel implant with or without phacoemulsification for glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7661862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33209889
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-6354
work_keys_str_mv AT wangbo xengelimplantwithorwithoutphacoemulsificationforglaucomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lengxiangjie xengelimplantwithorwithoutphacoemulsificationforglaucomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT anxuemei xengelimplantwithorwithoutphacoemulsificationforglaucomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangxiwen xengelimplantwithorwithoutphacoemulsificationforglaucomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuxiang xengelimplantwithorwithoutphacoemulsificationforglaucomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT luxuejing xengelimplantwithorwithoutphacoemulsificationforglaucomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis