Cargando…
Development and validation of a risk prediction model and scoring system for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis
BACKGROUND: A few models have been proposed for the prediction of the risk of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP), but many include factors that are not assessed routinely. Herein, we intend to develop and validate a predictive model for the occurrence of PEP. METH...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7661903/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33209879 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-5769 |
_version_ | 1783609293892747264 |
---|---|
author | Zheng, Ruhua Chen, Mengjie Wang, Xuying Li, Bingqiang He, Ting Wang, Lei Xu, Guifang Yao, Yuling Cao, Jun Shen, Yonghua Wang, Yi Zhu, Hao Zhang, Bin Wu, Han Zou, Xiaoping He, Guoping |
author_facet | Zheng, Ruhua Chen, Mengjie Wang, Xuying Li, Bingqiang He, Ting Wang, Lei Xu, Guifang Yao, Yuling Cao, Jun Shen, Yonghua Wang, Yi Zhu, Hao Zhang, Bin Wu, Han Zou, Xiaoping He, Guoping |
author_sort | Zheng, Ruhua |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A few models have been proposed for the prediction of the risk of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP), but many include factors that are not assessed routinely. Herein, we intend to develop and validate a predictive model for the occurrence of PEP. METHODS: Data of patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) from January 01, 2016 to May 16, 2019 (training set and internal test set) and from May 17, 2019 to December 25, 2019 (external test set) were retrospectively collected. The performance of the model was validated in the two validation cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 342 patients were included for the external test set, and 47 (13.7%) developed PEP. The variables included in the scoring system were gastrectomy history, high direct bilirubin (DBIL), high albumin (ALB), villous type of papillary orifice, nodular type of papillary orifice, pancreatic guidewire passages, precut sphincterotomy, and high operator experience. A total score >5 indicated high risk. In the external test set, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.718, the sensitivity was 0.723, and the specificity was 0.676. In the external test set, the probability of PEP was 6.1%, 17.0%, and 37.5% in patients with low (<0), moderate (0–5), and high (>5) risk scores, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study established a scoring system for predicting the risk of PEP using routinely measured clinical variables. Its application in routine work warrants further investigation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7661903 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76619032020-11-17 Development and validation of a risk prediction model and scoring system for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis Zheng, Ruhua Chen, Mengjie Wang, Xuying Li, Bingqiang He, Ting Wang, Lei Xu, Guifang Yao, Yuling Cao, Jun Shen, Yonghua Wang, Yi Zhu, Hao Zhang, Bin Wu, Han Zou, Xiaoping He, Guoping Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: A few models have been proposed for the prediction of the risk of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP), but many include factors that are not assessed routinely. Herein, we intend to develop and validate a predictive model for the occurrence of PEP. METHODS: Data of patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) from January 01, 2016 to May 16, 2019 (training set and internal test set) and from May 17, 2019 to December 25, 2019 (external test set) were retrospectively collected. The performance of the model was validated in the two validation cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 342 patients were included for the external test set, and 47 (13.7%) developed PEP. The variables included in the scoring system were gastrectomy history, high direct bilirubin (DBIL), high albumin (ALB), villous type of papillary orifice, nodular type of papillary orifice, pancreatic guidewire passages, precut sphincterotomy, and high operator experience. A total score >5 indicated high risk. In the external test set, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.718, the sensitivity was 0.723, and the specificity was 0.676. In the external test set, the probability of PEP was 6.1%, 17.0%, and 37.5% in patients with low (<0), moderate (0–5), and high (>5) risk scores, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study established a scoring system for predicting the risk of PEP using routinely measured clinical variables. Its application in routine work warrants further investigation. AME Publishing Company 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7661903/ /pubmed/33209879 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-5769 Text en 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zheng, Ruhua Chen, Mengjie Wang, Xuying Li, Bingqiang He, Ting Wang, Lei Xu, Guifang Yao, Yuling Cao, Jun Shen, Yonghua Wang, Yi Zhu, Hao Zhang, Bin Wu, Han Zou, Xiaoping He, Guoping Development and validation of a risk prediction model and scoring system for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis |
title | Development and validation of a risk prediction model and scoring system for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis |
title_full | Development and validation of a risk prediction model and scoring system for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis |
title_fullStr | Development and validation of a risk prediction model and scoring system for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and validation of a risk prediction model and scoring system for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis |
title_short | Development and validation of a risk prediction model and scoring system for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis |
title_sort | development and validation of a risk prediction model and scoring system for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7661903/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33209879 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-5769 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhengruhua developmentandvalidationofariskpredictionmodelandscoringsystemforpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis AT chenmengjie developmentandvalidationofariskpredictionmodelandscoringsystemforpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis AT wangxuying developmentandvalidationofariskpredictionmodelandscoringsystemforpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis AT libingqiang developmentandvalidationofariskpredictionmodelandscoringsystemforpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis AT heting developmentandvalidationofariskpredictionmodelandscoringsystemforpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis AT wanglei developmentandvalidationofariskpredictionmodelandscoringsystemforpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis AT xuguifang developmentandvalidationofariskpredictionmodelandscoringsystemforpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis AT yaoyuling developmentandvalidationofariskpredictionmodelandscoringsystemforpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis AT caojun developmentandvalidationofariskpredictionmodelandscoringsystemforpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis AT shenyonghua developmentandvalidationofariskpredictionmodelandscoringsystemforpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis AT wangyi developmentandvalidationofariskpredictionmodelandscoringsystemforpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis AT zhuhao developmentandvalidationofariskpredictionmodelandscoringsystemforpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis AT zhangbin developmentandvalidationofariskpredictionmodelandscoringsystemforpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis AT wuhan developmentandvalidationofariskpredictionmodelandscoringsystemforpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis AT zouxiaoping developmentandvalidationofariskpredictionmodelandscoringsystemforpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis AT heguoping developmentandvalidationofariskpredictionmodelandscoringsystemforpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis |