Cargando…

Development and validation of a risk prediction model and scoring system for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis

BACKGROUND: A few models have been proposed for the prediction of the risk of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP), but many include factors that are not assessed routinely. Herein, we intend to develop and validate a predictive model for the occurrence of PEP. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Ruhua, Chen, Mengjie, Wang, Xuying, Li, Bingqiang, He, Ting, Wang, Lei, Xu, Guifang, Yao, Yuling, Cao, Jun, Shen, Yonghua, Wang, Yi, Zhu, Hao, Zhang, Bin, Wu, Han, Zou, Xiaoping, He, Guoping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7661903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33209879
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-5769
_version_ 1783609293892747264
author Zheng, Ruhua
Chen, Mengjie
Wang, Xuying
Li, Bingqiang
He, Ting
Wang, Lei
Xu, Guifang
Yao, Yuling
Cao, Jun
Shen, Yonghua
Wang, Yi
Zhu, Hao
Zhang, Bin
Wu, Han
Zou, Xiaoping
He, Guoping
author_facet Zheng, Ruhua
Chen, Mengjie
Wang, Xuying
Li, Bingqiang
He, Ting
Wang, Lei
Xu, Guifang
Yao, Yuling
Cao, Jun
Shen, Yonghua
Wang, Yi
Zhu, Hao
Zhang, Bin
Wu, Han
Zou, Xiaoping
He, Guoping
author_sort Zheng, Ruhua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A few models have been proposed for the prediction of the risk of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP), but many include factors that are not assessed routinely. Herein, we intend to develop and validate a predictive model for the occurrence of PEP. METHODS: Data of patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) from January 01, 2016 to May 16, 2019 (training set and internal test set) and from May 17, 2019 to December 25, 2019 (external test set) were retrospectively collected. The performance of the model was validated in the two validation cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 342 patients were included for the external test set, and 47 (13.7%) developed PEP. The variables included in the scoring system were gastrectomy history, high direct bilirubin (DBIL), high albumin (ALB), villous type of papillary orifice, nodular type of papillary orifice, pancreatic guidewire passages, precut sphincterotomy, and high operator experience. A total score >5 indicated high risk. In the external test set, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.718, the sensitivity was 0.723, and the specificity was 0.676. In the external test set, the probability of PEP was 6.1%, 17.0%, and 37.5% in patients with low (<0), moderate (0–5), and high (>5) risk scores, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study established a scoring system for predicting the risk of PEP using routinely measured clinical variables. Its application in routine work warrants further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7661903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76619032020-11-17 Development and validation of a risk prediction model and scoring system for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis Zheng, Ruhua Chen, Mengjie Wang, Xuying Li, Bingqiang He, Ting Wang, Lei Xu, Guifang Yao, Yuling Cao, Jun Shen, Yonghua Wang, Yi Zhu, Hao Zhang, Bin Wu, Han Zou, Xiaoping He, Guoping Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: A few models have been proposed for the prediction of the risk of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP), but many include factors that are not assessed routinely. Herein, we intend to develop and validate a predictive model for the occurrence of PEP. METHODS: Data of patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) from January 01, 2016 to May 16, 2019 (training set and internal test set) and from May 17, 2019 to December 25, 2019 (external test set) were retrospectively collected. The performance of the model was validated in the two validation cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 342 patients were included for the external test set, and 47 (13.7%) developed PEP. The variables included in the scoring system were gastrectomy history, high direct bilirubin (DBIL), high albumin (ALB), villous type of papillary orifice, nodular type of papillary orifice, pancreatic guidewire passages, precut sphincterotomy, and high operator experience. A total score >5 indicated high risk. In the external test set, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.718, the sensitivity was 0.723, and the specificity was 0.676. In the external test set, the probability of PEP was 6.1%, 17.0%, and 37.5% in patients with low (<0), moderate (0–5), and high (>5) risk scores, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study established a scoring system for predicting the risk of PEP using routinely measured clinical variables. Its application in routine work warrants further investigation. AME Publishing Company 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7661903/ /pubmed/33209879 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-5769 Text en 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Zheng, Ruhua
Chen, Mengjie
Wang, Xuying
Li, Bingqiang
He, Ting
Wang, Lei
Xu, Guifang
Yao, Yuling
Cao, Jun
Shen, Yonghua
Wang, Yi
Zhu, Hao
Zhang, Bin
Wu, Han
Zou, Xiaoping
He, Guoping
Development and validation of a risk prediction model and scoring system for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis
title Development and validation of a risk prediction model and scoring system for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis
title_full Development and validation of a risk prediction model and scoring system for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis
title_fullStr Development and validation of a risk prediction model and scoring system for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of a risk prediction model and scoring system for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis
title_short Development and validation of a risk prediction model and scoring system for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis
title_sort development and validation of a risk prediction model and scoring system for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7661903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33209879
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-5769
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengruhua developmentandvalidationofariskpredictionmodelandscoringsystemforpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis
AT chenmengjie developmentandvalidationofariskpredictionmodelandscoringsystemforpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis
AT wangxuying developmentandvalidationofariskpredictionmodelandscoringsystemforpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis
AT libingqiang developmentandvalidationofariskpredictionmodelandscoringsystemforpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis
AT heting developmentandvalidationofariskpredictionmodelandscoringsystemforpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis
AT wanglei developmentandvalidationofariskpredictionmodelandscoringsystemforpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis
AT xuguifang developmentandvalidationofariskpredictionmodelandscoringsystemforpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis
AT yaoyuling developmentandvalidationofariskpredictionmodelandscoringsystemforpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis
AT caojun developmentandvalidationofariskpredictionmodelandscoringsystemforpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis
AT shenyonghua developmentandvalidationofariskpredictionmodelandscoringsystemforpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis
AT wangyi developmentandvalidationofariskpredictionmodelandscoringsystemforpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis
AT zhuhao developmentandvalidationofariskpredictionmodelandscoringsystemforpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis
AT zhangbin developmentandvalidationofariskpredictionmodelandscoringsystemforpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis
AT wuhan developmentandvalidationofariskpredictionmodelandscoringsystemforpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis
AT zouxiaoping developmentandvalidationofariskpredictionmodelandscoringsystemforpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis
AT heguoping developmentandvalidationofariskpredictionmodelandscoringsystemforpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitis