Cargando…

Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres

OBJECTIVES: To our knowledge no previous study has assessed the performance of a rapid antigen diagnostic immunoassay (RAD) conducted at the point of care (POC). We evaluated the Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device for diagnosis of coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) in symptomatic patients (n = 4...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Albert, Eliseo, Torres, Ignacio, Bueno, Felipe, Huntley, Dixie, Molla, Estefanía, Fernández-Fuentes, Miguel Ángel, Martínez, Mireia, Poujois, Sandrine, Forqué, Lorena, Valdivia, Arantxa, Solano de la Asunción, Carlos, Ferrer, Josep, Colomina, Javier, Navarro, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7662075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33189872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2020.11.004
_version_ 1783609323861049344
author Albert, Eliseo
Torres, Ignacio
Bueno, Felipe
Huntley, Dixie
Molla, Estefanía
Fernández-Fuentes, Miguel Ángel
Martínez, Mireia
Poujois, Sandrine
Forqué, Lorena
Valdivia, Arantxa
Solano de la Asunción, Carlos
Ferrer, Josep
Colomina, Javier
Navarro, David
author_facet Albert, Eliseo
Torres, Ignacio
Bueno, Felipe
Huntley, Dixie
Molla, Estefanía
Fernández-Fuentes, Miguel Ángel
Martínez, Mireia
Poujois, Sandrine
Forqué, Lorena
Valdivia, Arantxa
Solano de la Asunción, Carlos
Ferrer, Josep
Colomina, Javier
Navarro, David
author_sort Albert, Eliseo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To our knowledge no previous study has assessed the performance of a rapid antigen diagnostic immunoassay (RAD) conducted at the point of care (POC). We evaluated the Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device for diagnosis of coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) in symptomatic patients (n = 412) attending primary healthcare centres. METHODS: RAD was performed immediately after sampling following the manufacturer's instructions (reading at 15 min). RT-PCRs were carried out within 24 h of specimen collection. Samples displaying discordant results were processed for culture in Vero E6 cells. Presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in cell cultures was confirmed by RT-PCR. RESULTS: Out of 412 patients, 43 (10.4%) tested positive by RT-PCR and RAD, and 358 (86.9%) tested negative by both methods; discordant results (RT-PCR+/RAD–) were obtained in 11 patients (2.7%). Overall specificity and sensitivity of rapid antigen detection (RAD) was 100% (95%CI 98.7–100%) and 79.6% (95%CI 67.0–88.8%), respectively, taking RT-PCR as the reference. Overall RAD negative predictive value for an estimated prevalence of 5% and 10% was 99% (95%CI 97.4–99.6%) and 97.9% (95%CI 95.9–98.9), respectively. SARS-CoV-2 could not be cultured from specimens yielding RT-PCR+/RAD– results (n = 11). CONCLUSION: The Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device performed well as a POC test for early diagnosis of COVID-19 in primary healthcare centres. More crucially, the data suggested that patients with RT-PCR-proven COVID-19 testing negative by RAD are unlikely to be infectious.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7662075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76620752020-11-13 Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres Albert, Eliseo Torres, Ignacio Bueno, Felipe Huntley, Dixie Molla, Estefanía Fernández-Fuentes, Miguel Ángel Martínez, Mireia Poujois, Sandrine Forqué, Lorena Valdivia, Arantxa Solano de la Asunción, Carlos Ferrer, Josep Colomina, Javier Navarro, David Clin Microbiol Infect Research Note OBJECTIVES: To our knowledge no previous study has assessed the performance of a rapid antigen diagnostic immunoassay (RAD) conducted at the point of care (POC). We evaluated the Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device for diagnosis of coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) in symptomatic patients (n = 412) attending primary healthcare centres. METHODS: RAD was performed immediately after sampling following the manufacturer's instructions (reading at 15 min). RT-PCRs were carried out within 24 h of specimen collection. Samples displaying discordant results were processed for culture in Vero E6 cells. Presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in cell cultures was confirmed by RT-PCR. RESULTS: Out of 412 patients, 43 (10.4%) tested positive by RT-PCR and RAD, and 358 (86.9%) tested negative by both methods; discordant results (RT-PCR+/RAD–) were obtained in 11 patients (2.7%). Overall specificity and sensitivity of rapid antigen detection (RAD) was 100% (95%CI 98.7–100%) and 79.6% (95%CI 67.0–88.8%), respectively, taking RT-PCR as the reference. Overall RAD negative predictive value for an estimated prevalence of 5% and 10% was 99% (95%CI 97.4–99.6%) and 97.9% (95%CI 95.9–98.9), respectively. SARS-CoV-2 could not be cultured from specimens yielding RT-PCR+/RAD– results (n = 11). CONCLUSION: The Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device performed well as a POC test for early diagnosis of COVID-19 in primary healthcare centres. More crucially, the data suggested that patients with RT-PCR-proven COVID-19 testing negative by RAD are unlikely to be infectious. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021-03 2020-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7662075/ /pubmed/33189872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2020.11.004 Text en © 2020 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Research Note
Albert, Eliseo
Torres, Ignacio
Bueno, Felipe
Huntley, Dixie
Molla, Estefanía
Fernández-Fuentes, Miguel Ángel
Martínez, Mireia
Poujois, Sandrine
Forqué, Lorena
Valdivia, Arantxa
Solano de la Asunción, Carlos
Ferrer, Josep
Colomina, Javier
Navarro, David
Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres
title Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres
title_full Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres
title_fullStr Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres
title_full_unstemmed Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres
title_short Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres
title_sort field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (panbio™ covid-19 ag rapid test device) for covid-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres
topic Research Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7662075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33189872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2020.11.004
work_keys_str_mv AT alberteliseo fieldevaluationofarapidantigentestpanbiocovid19agrapidtestdeviceforcovid19diagnosisinprimaryhealthcarecentres
AT torresignacio fieldevaluationofarapidantigentestpanbiocovid19agrapidtestdeviceforcovid19diagnosisinprimaryhealthcarecentres
AT buenofelipe fieldevaluationofarapidantigentestpanbiocovid19agrapidtestdeviceforcovid19diagnosisinprimaryhealthcarecentres
AT huntleydixie fieldevaluationofarapidantigentestpanbiocovid19agrapidtestdeviceforcovid19diagnosisinprimaryhealthcarecentres
AT mollaestefania fieldevaluationofarapidantigentestpanbiocovid19agrapidtestdeviceforcovid19diagnosisinprimaryhealthcarecentres
AT fernandezfuentesmiguelangel fieldevaluationofarapidantigentestpanbiocovid19agrapidtestdeviceforcovid19diagnosisinprimaryhealthcarecentres
AT martinezmireia fieldevaluationofarapidantigentestpanbiocovid19agrapidtestdeviceforcovid19diagnosisinprimaryhealthcarecentres
AT poujoissandrine fieldevaluationofarapidantigentestpanbiocovid19agrapidtestdeviceforcovid19diagnosisinprimaryhealthcarecentres
AT forquelorena fieldevaluationofarapidantigentestpanbiocovid19agrapidtestdeviceforcovid19diagnosisinprimaryhealthcarecentres
AT valdiviaarantxa fieldevaluationofarapidantigentestpanbiocovid19agrapidtestdeviceforcovid19diagnosisinprimaryhealthcarecentres
AT solanodelaasuncioncarlos fieldevaluationofarapidantigentestpanbiocovid19agrapidtestdeviceforcovid19diagnosisinprimaryhealthcarecentres
AT ferrerjosep fieldevaluationofarapidantigentestpanbiocovid19agrapidtestdeviceforcovid19diagnosisinprimaryhealthcarecentres
AT colominajavier fieldevaluationofarapidantigentestpanbiocovid19agrapidtestdeviceforcovid19diagnosisinprimaryhealthcarecentres
AT navarrodavid fieldevaluationofarapidantigentestpanbiocovid19agrapidtestdeviceforcovid19diagnosisinprimaryhealthcarecentres