Cargando…
Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres
OBJECTIVES: To our knowledge no previous study has assessed the performance of a rapid antigen diagnostic immunoassay (RAD) conducted at the point of care (POC). We evaluated the Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device for diagnosis of coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) in symptomatic patients (n = 4...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7662075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33189872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2020.11.004 |
_version_ | 1783609323861049344 |
---|---|
author | Albert, Eliseo Torres, Ignacio Bueno, Felipe Huntley, Dixie Molla, Estefanía Fernández-Fuentes, Miguel Ángel Martínez, Mireia Poujois, Sandrine Forqué, Lorena Valdivia, Arantxa Solano de la Asunción, Carlos Ferrer, Josep Colomina, Javier Navarro, David |
author_facet | Albert, Eliseo Torres, Ignacio Bueno, Felipe Huntley, Dixie Molla, Estefanía Fernández-Fuentes, Miguel Ángel Martínez, Mireia Poujois, Sandrine Forqué, Lorena Valdivia, Arantxa Solano de la Asunción, Carlos Ferrer, Josep Colomina, Javier Navarro, David |
author_sort | Albert, Eliseo |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To our knowledge no previous study has assessed the performance of a rapid antigen diagnostic immunoassay (RAD) conducted at the point of care (POC). We evaluated the Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device for diagnosis of coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) in symptomatic patients (n = 412) attending primary healthcare centres. METHODS: RAD was performed immediately after sampling following the manufacturer's instructions (reading at 15 min). RT-PCRs were carried out within 24 h of specimen collection. Samples displaying discordant results were processed for culture in Vero E6 cells. Presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in cell cultures was confirmed by RT-PCR. RESULTS: Out of 412 patients, 43 (10.4%) tested positive by RT-PCR and RAD, and 358 (86.9%) tested negative by both methods; discordant results (RT-PCR+/RAD–) were obtained in 11 patients (2.7%). Overall specificity and sensitivity of rapid antigen detection (RAD) was 100% (95%CI 98.7–100%) and 79.6% (95%CI 67.0–88.8%), respectively, taking RT-PCR as the reference. Overall RAD negative predictive value for an estimated prevalence of 5% and 10% was 99% (95%CI 97.4–99.6%) and 97.9% (95%CI 95.9–98.9), respectively. SARS-CoV-2 could not be cultured from specimens yielding RT-PCR+/RAD– results (n = 11). CONCLUSION: The Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device performed well as a POC test for early diagnosis of COVID-19 in primary healthcare centres. More crucially, the data suggested that patients with RT-PCR-proven COVID-19 testing negative by RAD are unlikely to be infectious. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7662075 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76620752020-11-13 Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres Albert, Eliseo Torres, Ignacio Bueno, Felipe Huntley, Dixie Molla, Estefanía Fernández-Fuentes, Miguel Ángel Martínez, Mireia Poujois, Sandrine Forqué, Lorena Valdivia, Arantxa Solano de la Asunción, Carlos Ferrer, Josep Colomina, Javier Navarro, David Clin Microbiol Infect Research Note OBJECTIVES: To our knowledge no previous study has assessed the performance of a rapid antigen diagnostic immunoassay (RAD) conducted at the point of care (POC). We evaluated the Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device for diagnosis of coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) in symptomatic patients (n = 412) attending primary healthcare centres. METHODS: RAD was performed immediately after sampling following the manufacturer's instructions (reading at 15 min). RT-PCRs were carried out within 24 h of specimen collection. Samples displaying discordant results were processed for culture in Vero E6 cells. Presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in cell cultures was confirmed by RT-PCR. RESULTS: Out of 412 patients, 43 (10.4%) tested positive by RT-PCR and RAD, and 358 (86.9%) tested negative by both methods; discordant results (RT-PCR+/RAD–) were obtained in 11 patients (2.7%). Overall specificity and sensitivity of rapid antigen detection (RAD) was 100% (95%CI 98.7–100%) and 79.6% (95%CI 67.0–88.8%), respectively, taking RT-PCR as the reference. Overall RAD negative predictive value for an estimated prevalence of 5% and 10% was 99% (95%CI 97.4–99.6%) and 97.9% (95%CI 95.9–98.9), respectively. SARS-CoV-2 could not be cultured from specimens yielding RT-PCR+/RAD– results (n = 11). CONCLUSION: The Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device performed well as a POC test for early diagnosis of COVID-19 in primary healthcare centres. More crucially, the data suggested that patients with RT-PCR-proven COVID-19 testing negative by RAD are unlikely to be infectious. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021-03 2020-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7662075/ /pubmed/33189872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2020.11.004 Text en © 2020 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Research Note Albert, Eliseo Torres, Ignacio Bueno, Felipe Huntley, Dixie Molla, Estefanía Fernández-Fuentes, Miguel Ángel Martínez, Mireia Poujois, Sandrine Forqué, Lorena Valdivia, Arantxa Solano de la Asunción, Carlos Ferrer, Josep Colomina, Javier Navarro, David Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres |
title | Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres |
title_full | Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres |
title_fullStr | Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres |
title_full_unstemmed | Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres |
title_short | Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres |
title_sort | field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (panbio™ covid-19 ag rapid test device) for covid-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres |
topic | Research Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7662075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33189872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2020.11.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alberteliseo fieldevaluationofarapidantigentestpanbiocovid19agrapidtestdeviceforcovid19diagnosisinprimaryhealthcarecentres AT torresignacio fieldevaluationofarapidantigentestpanbiocovid19agrapidtestdeviceforcovid19diagnosisinprimaryhealthcarecentres AT buenofelipe fieldevaluationofarapidantigentestpanbiocovid19agrapidtestdeviceforcovid19diagnosisinprimaryhealthcarecentres AT huntleydixie fieldevaluationofarapidantigentestpanbiocovid19agrapidtestdeviceforcovid19diagnosisinprimaryhealthcarecentres AT mollaestefania fieldevaluationofarapidantigentestpanbiocovid19agrapidtestdeviceforcovid19diagnosisinprimaryhealthcarecentres AT fernandezfuentesmiguelangel fieldevaluationofarapidantigentestpanbiocovid19agrapidtestdeviceforcovid19diagnosisinprimaryhealthcarecentres AT martinezmireia fieldevaluationofarapidantigentestpanbiocovid19agrapidtestdeviceforcovid19diagnosisinprimaryhealthcarecentres AT poujoissandrine fieldevaluationofarapidantigentestpanbiocovid19agrapidtestdeviceforcovid19diagnosisinprimaryhealthcarecentres AT forquelorena fieldevaluationofarapidantigentestpanbiocovid19agrapidtestdeviceforcovid19diagnosisinprimaryhealthcarecentres AT valdiviaarantxa fieldevaluationofarapidantigentestpanbiocovid19agrapidtestdeviceforcovid19diagnosisinprimaryhealthcarecentres AT solanodelaasuncioncarlos fieldevaluationofarapidantigentestpanbiocovid19agrapidtestdeviceforcovid19diagnosisinprimaryhealthcarecentres AT ferrerjosep fieldevaluationofarapidantigentestpanbiocovid19agrapidtestdeviceforcovid19diagnosisinprimaryhealthcarecentres AT colominajavier fieldevaluationofarapidantigentestpanbiocovid19agrapidtestdeviceforcovid19diagnosisinprimaryhealthcarecentres AT navarrodavid fieldevaluationofarapidantigentestpanbiocovid19agrapidtestdeviceforcovid19diagnosisinprimaryhealthcarecentres |