Cargando…
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb45
The food enzyme α‐amylase (1,4‐α‐D‐glucan glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb45 by Danisco US Inc. The production strain of the food enzyme contains multiple copies of an antimicrobial resistance gene. However, based on the abs...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7662087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33209155 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6311 |
_version_ | 1783609326700593152 |
---|---|
author | Silano, Vittorio Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lambré, Claude Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Glandorf, Boet Herman, Lieve Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Gomes, Ana Kovalkovičová, Natália Liu, Yi Maia, Joaquim Chesson, Andrew |
author_facet | Silano, Vittorio Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lambré, Claude Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Glandorf, Boet Herman, Lieve Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Gomes, Ana Kovalkovičová, Natália Liu, Yi Maia, Joaquim Chesson, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | The food enzyme α‐amylase (1,4‐α‐D‐glucan glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb45 by Danisco US Inc. The production strain of the food enzyme contains multiple copies of an antimicrobial resistance gene. However, based on the absence of viable cells and DNA from the production organism in the food enzyme, this was not considered to be a risk. The α‐amylase is intended to be used in brewing processes and distilled alcohol production. Since residual amounts of the food enzyme are removed by distillation, no dietary exposure was calculated for this intended use. Based on the maximum use levels recommended for the brewing processes and individual data from the EFSA Comprehensive European Food Consumption Database, dietary exposure to the food enzyme–total organic solids (TOS) was estimated to be up to 0.138 mg TOS/kg body weight per day in European populations. Toxicological tests with the food enzyme indicated that there was no concern with respect to genotoxicity or systemic toxicity. A no observed adverse effect level was identified in rats, which, compared with the dietary exposure, results in a margin of exposure of at least 484. Similarity of the amino acid sequence to those of known allergens was searched and one match was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions can be excluded in distilled alcohol production but cannot be excluded when the enzyme is used in brewing. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7662087 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76620872020-11-17 Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb45 Silano, Vittorio Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lambré, Claude Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Glandorf, Boet Herman, Lieve Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Gomes, Ana Kovalkovičová, Natália Liu, Yi Maia, Joaquim Chesson, Andrew EFSA J Scientific Opinion The food enzyme α‐amylase (1,4‐α‐D‐glucan glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb45 by Danisco US Inc. The production strain of the food enzyme contains multiple copies of an antimicrobial resistance gene. However, based on the absence of viable cells and DNA from the production organism in the food enzyme, this was not considered to be a risk. The α‐amylase is intended to be used in brewing processes and distilled alcohol production. Since residual amounts of the food enzyme are removed by distillation, no dietary exposure was calculated for this intended use. Based on the maximum use levels recommended for the brewing processes and individual data from the EFSA Comprehensive European Food Consumption Database, dietary exposure to the food enzyme–total organic solids (TOS) was estimated to be up to 0.138 mg TOS/kg body weight per day in European populations. Toxicological tests with the food enzyme indicated that there was no concern with respect to genotoxicity or systemic toxicity. A no observed adverse effect level was identified in rats, which, compared with the dietary exposure, results in a margin of exposure of at least 484. Similarity of the amino acid sequence to those of known allergens was searched and one match was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions can be excluded in distilled alcohol production but cannot be excluded when the enzyme is used in brewing. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7662087/ /pubmed/33209155 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6311 Text en © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Silano, Vittorio Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lambré, Claude Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Glandorf, Boet Herman, Lieve Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Gomes, Ana Kovalkovičová, Natália Liu, Yi Maia, Joaquim Chesson, Andrew Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb45 |
title | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb45 |
title_full | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb45 |
title_fullStr | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb45 |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb45 |
title_short | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb45 |
title_sort | safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified bacillus licheniformis strain dp‐dzb45 |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7662087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33209155 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6311 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb45 AT silanovittorio safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb45 AT baratbavierajosemanuel safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb45 AT bolognesiclaudia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb45 AT cocconcellipiersandro safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb45 AT crebelliriccardo safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb45 AT gottdavidmichael safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb45 AT grobkonrad safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb45 AT lambreclaude safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb45 AT lampievgenia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb45 AT mengelersmarcel safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb45 AT mortensenalicja safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb45 AT rivieregilles safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb45 AT steffenseningerlise safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb45 AT tlustoschristina safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb45 AT vanloverenhenk safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb45 AT vernislaurence safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb45 AT zornholger safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb45 AT glandorfboet safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb45 AT hermanlieve safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb45 AT andryszkiewiczmagdalena safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb45 AT gomesana safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb45 AT kovalkovicovanatalia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb45 AT liuyi safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb45 AT maiajoaquim safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb45 AT chessonandrew safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstraindpdzb45 |