Cargando…

Anesthesiologist to Patient Communication: A Systematic Review

IMPORTANCE: Many patients are admitted to the intensive care unit following surgery, and some of them will experience incomplete recovery. For patients in this situation, preoperative discussions regarding patient values and preferences may direct care decisions. Existing literature shows that it is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tylee, Michael J., Rubenfeld, Gordon D., Wijeysundera, Duminda, Sklar, Michael C., Hussain, Sajid, Adhikari, Neill K. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7662141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33180130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.23503
_version_ 1783609337951813632
author Tylee, Michael J.
Rubenfeld, Gordon D.
Wijeysundera, Duminda
Sklar, Michael C.
Hussain, Sajid
Adhikari, Neill K. J.
author_facet Tylee, Michael J.
Rubenfeld, Gordon D.
Wijeysundera, Duminda
Sklar, Michael C.
Hussain, Sajid
Adhikari, Neill K. J.
author_sort Tylee, Michael J.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Many patients are admitted to the intensive care unit following surgery, and some of them will experience incomplete recovery. For patients in this situation, preoperative discussions regarding patient values and preferences may direct care decisions. Existing literature shows that it is uncommon for surgeons to have these conversations preoperatively; it is unclear whether anesthesia professionals engage with patients on this topic prior to surgery. OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on communication between patients and anesthesia professionals, with a focus on discussions related to postoperative critical care. EVIDENCE REVIEW: MEDLINE and Web of Science were searched using specific search criteria from January 1980 to April 2020. Studies describing encounters between patients and anesthesia professionals were selected, and data regarding study objectives, study design, methodology, measures, outcomes, patient characteristics, and clinical setting were extracted and collated. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline was followed. FINDINGS: A total of 12 studies including 1284 individual patient encounters were eligible for inclusion in the review. These studies demonstrated that communication between patients and anesthesia professionals related to postoperative care is rare: only 2 studies reported communication regarding adverse postoperative events, and this communication behavior was reported in only 46 of 1284 consultations (3.6%) across all studies. Additional findings were that communication during these encounters is dominated by anesthetic planning and perioperative logistics, with variable discussion of perioperative risks vs benefits and infrequent elicitation of patient values and preferences. Some data suggest that patients wish to be involved in perioperative decision-making but are often limited by an incomplete understanding of risks and benefits. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This systematic review found that communication in anesthesia is dominated by anesthetic planning and discussion of preoperative logistics, whereas postoperative critical care is rarely discussed. Most patients who are admitted to an intensive care unit after a major operation will not have had a discussion regarding goals of care specific to protracted recovery or prolonged intensive care with their anesthesiologist.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7662141
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76621412020-11-17 Anesthesiologist to Patient Communication: A Systematic Review Tylee, Michael J. Rubenfeld, Gordon D. Wijeysundera, Duminda Sklar, Michael C. Hussain, Sajid Adhikari, Neill K. J. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Many patients are admitted to the intensive care unit following surgery, and some of them will experience incomplete recovery. For patients in this situation, preoperative discussions regarding patient values and preferences may direct care decisions. Existing literature shows that it is uncommon for surgeons to have these conversations preoperatively; it is unclear whether anesthesia professionals engage with patients on this topic prior to surgery. OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on communication between patients and anesthesia professionals, with a focus on discussions related to postoperative critical care. EVIDENCE REVIEW: MEDLINE and Web of Science were searched using specific search criteria from January 1980 to April 2020. Studies describing encounters between patients and anesthesia professionals were selected, and data regarding study objectives, study design, methodology, measures, outcomes, patient characteristics, and clinical setting were extracted and collated. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline was followed. FINDINGS: A total of 12 studies including 1284 individual patient encounters were eligible for inclusion in the review. These studies demonstrated that communication between patients and anesthesia professionals related to postoperative care is rare: only 2 studies reported communication regarding adverse postoperative events, and this communication behavior was reported in only 46 of 1284 consultations (3.6%) across all studies. Additional findings were that communication during these encounters is dominated by anesthetic planning and perioperative logistics, with variable discussion of perioperative risks vs benefits and infrequent elicitation of patient values and preferences. Some data suggest that patients wish to be involved in perioperative decision-making but are often limited by an incomplete understanding of risks and benefits. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This systematic review found that communication in anesthesia is dominated by anesthetic planning and discussion of preoperative logistics, whereas postoperative critical care is rarely discussed. Most patients who are admitted to an intensive care unit after a major operation will not have had a discussion regarding goals of care specific to protracted recovery or prolonged intensive care with their anesthesiologist. American Medical Association 2020-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7662141/ /pubmed/33180130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.23503 Text en Copyright 2020 Tylee MJ et al. JAMA Network Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Tylee, Michael J.
Rubenfeld, Gordon D.
Wijeysundera, Duminda
Sklar, Michael C.
Hussain, Sajid
Adhikari, Neill K. J.
Anesthesiologist to Patient Communication: A Systematic Review
title Anesthesiologist to Patient Communication: A Systematic Review
title_full Anesthesiologist to Patient Communication: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Anesthesiologist to Patient Communication: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Anesthesiologist to Patient Communication: A Systematic Review
title_short Anesthesiologist to Patient Communication: A Systematic Review
title_sort anesthesiologist to patient communication: a systematic review
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7662141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33180130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.23503
work_keys_str_mv AT tyleemichaelj anesthesiologisttopatientcommunicationasystematicreview
AT rubenfeldgordond anesthesiologisttopatientcommunicationasystematicreview
AT wijeysunderaduminda anesthesiologisttopatientcommunicationasystematicreview
AT sklarmichaelc anesthesiologisttopatientcommunicationasystematicreview
AT hussainsajid anesthesiologisttopatientcommunicationasystematicreview
AT adhikarineillkj anesthesiologisttopatientcommunicationasystematicreview