Cargando…

Cross-continental analysis of coastal biodiversity change

Whereas the anthropogenic impact on marine biodiversity is undebated, the quantification and prediction of this change are not trivial. Simple traditional measures of biodiversity (e.g. richness, diversity indices) do not capture the magnitude and direction of changes in species or functional compos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rishworth, Gavin M., Adams, Janine B., Bird, Matthew S., Carrasco, Nicola K., Dänhardt, Andreas, Dannheim, Jennifer, Lemley, Daniel A., Pistorius, Pierre A., Scheiffarth, Gregor, Hillebrand, Helmut
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7662198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33131440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0452
_version_ 1783609345404043264
author Rishworth, Gavin M.
Adams, Janine B.
Bird, Matthew S.
Carrasco, Nicola K.
Dänhardt, Andreas
Dannheim, Jennifer
Lemley, Daniel A.
Pistorius, Pierre A.
Scheiffarth, Gregor
Hillebrand, Helmut
author_facet Rishworth, Gavin M.
Adams, Janine B.
Bird, Matthew S.
Carrasco, Nicola K.
Dänhardt, Andreas
Dannheim, Jennifer
Lemley, Daniel A.
Pistorius, Pierre A.
Scheiffarth, Gregor
Hillebrand, Helmut
author_sort Rishworth, Gavin M.
collection PubMed
description Whereas the anthropogenic impact on marine biodiversity is undebated, the quantification and prediction of this change are not trivial. Simple traditional measures of biodiversity (e.g. richness, diversity indices) do not capture the magnitude and direction of changes in species or functional composition. In this paper, we apply recently developed methods for measuring biodiversity turnover to time-series data of four broad taxonomic groups from two coastal regions: the southern North Sea (Germany) and the South African coast. Both areas share geomorphological features and ecosystem types, allowing for a critical assessment of the most informative metrics of biodiversity change across organism groups. We found little evidence for directional trends in univariate metrics of diversity for either the effective number of taxa or the amount of richness change. However, turnover in composition was high (on average nearly 30% of identities when addressing presence or absence of species) and even higher when taking the relative dominance of species into account. This turnover accumulated over time at similar rates across regions and organism groups. We conclude that biodiversity metrics responsive to turnover provide a more accurate reflection of community change relative to conventional metrics (absolute richness or relative abundance) and are spatially broadly applicable. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Integrative research perspectives on marine conservation’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7662198
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76621982020-11-13 Cross-continental analysis of coastal biodiversity change Rishworth, Gavin M. Adams, Janine B. Bird, Matthew S. Carrasco, Nicola K. Dänhardt, Andreas Dannheim, Jennifer Lemley, Daniel A. Pistorius, Pierre A. Scheiffarth, Gregor Hillebrand, Helmut Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Articles Whereas the anthropogenic impact on marine biodiversity is undebated, the quantification and prediction of this change are not trivial. Simple traditional measures of biodiversity (e.g. richness, diversity indices) do not capture the magnitude and direction of changes in species or functional composition. In this paper, we apply recently developed methods for measuring biodiversity turnover to time-series data of four broad taxonomic groups from two coastal regions: the southern North Sea (Germany) and the South African coast. Both areas share geomorphological features and ecosystem types, allowing for a critical assessment of the most informative metrics of biodiversity change across organism groups. We found little evidence for directional trends in univariate metrics of diversity for either the effective number of taxa or the amount of richness change. However, turnover in composition was high (on average nearly 30% of identities when addressing presence or absence of species) and even higher when taking the relative dominance of species into account. This turnover accumulated over time at similar rates across regions and organism groups. We conclude that biodiversity metrics responsive to turnover provide a more accurate reflection of community change relative to conventional metrics (absolute richness or relative abundance) and are spatially broadly applicable. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Integrative research perspectives on marine conservation’. The Royal Society 2020-12-21 2020-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7662198/ /pubmed/33131440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0452 Text en © 2020 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Articles
Rishworth, Gavin M.
Adams, Janine B.
Bird, Matthew S.
Carrasco, Nicola K.
Dänhardt, Andreas
Dannheim, Jennifer
Lemley, Daniel A.
Pistorius, Pierre A.
Scheiffarth, Gregor
Hillebrand, Helmut
Cross-continental analysis of coastal biodiversity change
title Cross-continental analysis of coastal biodiversity change
title_full Cross-continental analysis of coastal biodiversity change
title_fullStr Cross-continental analysis of coastal biodiversity change
title_full_unstemmed Cross-continental analysis of coastal biodiversity change
title_short Cross-continental analysis of coastal biodiversity change
title_sort cross-continental analysis of coastal biodiversity change
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7662198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33131440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0452
work_keys_str_mv AT rishworthgavinm crosscontinentalanalysisofcoastalbiodiversitychange
AT adamsjanineb crosscontinentalanalysisofcoastalbiodiversitychange
AT birdmatthews crosscontinentalanalysisofcoastalbiodiversitychange
AT carrasconicolak crosscontinentalanalysisofcoastalbiodiversitychange
AT danhardtandreas crosscontinentalanalysisofcoastalbiodiversitychange
AT dannheimjennifer crosscontinentalanalysisofcoastalbiodiversitychange
AT lemleydaniela crosscontinentalanalysisofcoastalbiodiversitychange
AT pistoriuspierrea crosscontinentalanalysisofcoastalbiodiversitychange
AT scheiffarthgregor crosscontinentalanalysisofcoastalbiodiversitychange
AT hillebrandhelmut crosscontinentalanalysisofcoastalbiodiversitychange