Cargando…

A Comparison of Equation Córdoba for Estimation of Body Fat (ECORE-BF) with Other Prediction Equations

There are multiple formulas for estimating the percentage of body fat (BF%). Clínica Universidad de Navarra-Body Adiposity Estimator (CUN-BAE) is one of the most used formulas because of its accuracy and its association with cardiovascular pathologies. Equation Córdoba for Estimation of Body Fat (EC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Molina-Luque, Rafael, Yañez, Aina M, Bennasar-Veny, Miquel, Romero-Saldaña, Manuel, Molina-Recio, Guillermo, López-González, Ángel-Arturo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7662211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33138089
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217940
_version_ 1783609347083862016
author Molina-Luque, Rafael
Yañez, Aina M
Bennasar-Veny, Miquel
Romero-Saldaña, Manuel
Molina-Recio, Guillermo
López-González, Ángel-Arturo
author_facet Molina-Luque, Rafael
Yañez, Aina M
Bennasar-Veny, Miquel
Romero-Saldaña, Manuel
Molina-Recio, Guillermo
López-González, Ángel-Arturo
author_sort Molina-Luque, Rafael
collection PubMed
description There are multiple formulas for estimating the percentage of body fat (BF%). Clínica Universidad de Navarra-Body Adiposity Estimator (CUN-BAE) is one of the most used formulas because of its accuracy and its association with cardiovascular pathologies. Equation Córdoba for Estimation of Body Fat (ECORE-BF) was developed to simplify the calculation of BF% while maintaining a similar level of accuracy. The objective was to compare ECORE-BF in a large sample of Spanish workers using CUN-BAE as a reference. A cross-sectional study was carried out on 196,844 participants. The BF% was estimated using different formulas: relative fat mass (RFM), Palafolls, Deurenberg, and ECORE-BF. The accuracy of the estimation was determined using Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and the Bland–Altman method, using CUN-BAE as the reference method. ECORE-BF reached the highest concordance (CCC = 0.998). It also showed the lowest mean difference (−0.0077) and the tightest agreement limits (−0.9723, 0.9569) in the Bland–Altman test. In both analyses, it remained robust even when separating the analyses by sex, nutritional status, or age. ECORE-BF presented as the most straightforward and most accurate equation for the estimation of BF%, remaining robust regardless of population characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7662211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76622112020-11-14 A Comparison of Equation Córdoba for Estimation of Body Fat (ECORE-BF) with Other Prediction Equations Molina-Luque, Rafael Yañez, Aina M Bennasar-Veny, Miquel Romero-Saldaña, Manuel Molina-Recio, Guillermo López-González, Ángel-Arturo Int J Environ Res Public Health Article There are multiple formulas for estimating the percentage of body fat (BF%). Clínica Universidad de Navarra-Body Adiposity Estimator (CUN-BAE) is one of the most used formulas because of its accuracy and its association with cardiovascular pathologies. Equation Córdoba for Estimation of Body Fat (ECORE-BF) was developed to simplify the calculation of BF% while maintaining a similar level of accuracy. The objective was to compare ECORE-BF in a large sample of Spanish workers using CUN-BAE as a reference. A cross-sectional study was carried out on 196,844 participants. The BF% was estimated using different formulas: relative fat mass (RFM), Palafolls, Deurenberg, and ECORE-BF. The accuracy of the estimation was determined using Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and the Bland–Altman method, using CUN-BAE as the reference method. ECORE-BF reached the highest concordance (CCC = 0.998). It also showed the lowest mean difference (−0.0077) and the tightest agreement limits (−0.9723, 0.9569) in the Bland–Altman test. In both analyses, it remained robust even when separating the analyses by sex, nutritional status, or age. ECORE-BF presented as the most straightforward and most accurate equation for the estimation of BF%, remaining robust regardless of population characteristics. MDPI 2020-10-29 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7662211/ /pubmed/33138089 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217940 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Molina-Luque, Rafael
Yañez, Aina M
Bennasar-Veny, Miquel
Romero-Saldaña, Manuel
Molina-Recio, Guillermo
López-González, Ángel-Arturo
A Comparison of Equation Córdoba for Estimation of Body Fat (ECORE-BF) with Other Prediction Equations
title A Comparison of Equation Córdoba for Estimation of Body Fat (ECORE-BF) with Other Prediction Equations
title_full A Comparison of Equation Córdoba for Estimation of Body Fat (ECORE-BF) with Other Prediction Equations
title_fullStr A Comparison of Equation Córdoba for Estimation of Body Fat (ECORE-BF) with Other Prediction Equations
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Equation Córdoba for Estimation of Body Fat (ECORE-BF) with Other Prediction Equations
title_short A Comparison of Equation Córdoba for Estimation of Body Fat (ECORE-BF) with Other Prediction Equations
title_sort comparison of equation córdoba for estimation of body fat (ecore-bf) with other prediction equations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7662211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33138089
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217940
work_keys_str_mv AT molinaluquerafael acomparisonofequationcordobaforestimationofbodyfatecorebfwithotherpredictionequations
AT yanezainam acomparisonofequationcordobaforestimationofbodyfatecorebfwithotherpredictionequations
AT bennasarvenymiquel acomparisonofequationcordobaforestimationofbodyfatecorebfwithotherpredictionequations
AT romerosaldanamanuel acomparisonofequationcordobaforestimationofbodyfatecorebfwithotherpredictionequations
AT molinarecioguillermo acomparisonofequationcordobaforestimationofbodyfatecorebfwithotherpredictionequations
AT lopezgonzalezangelarturo acomparisonofequationcordobaforestimationofbodyfatecorebfwithotherpredictionequations
AT molinaluquerafael comparisonofequationcordobaforestimationofbodyfatecorebfwithotherpredictionequations
AT yanezainam comparisonofequationcordobaforestimationofbodyfatecorebfwithotherpredictionequations
AT bennasarvenymiquel comparisonofequationcordobaforestimationofbodyfatecorebfwithotherpredictionequations
AT romerosaldanamanuel comparisonofequationcordobaforestimationofbodyfatecorebfwithotherpredictionequations
AT molinarecioguillermo comparisonofequationcordobaforestimationofbodyfatecorebfwithotherpredictionequations
AT lopezgonzalezangelarturo comparisonofequationcordobaforestimationofbodyfatecorebfwithotherpredictionequations