Cargando…

Simulating the Impact of Future Climate Change and Ecological Restoration on Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Two Ecological Shelters and Three Belts in China

Development of suitable ecological protection and restoration policies for sustainable management needs to assess the potential impacts of future land use and climate change on ecosystem services. The two ecological shelters and three belts (TSTB) are significant for improving ecosystem services and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Liang-Jie, Ma, Shuai, Qiao, Yong-Peng, Zhang, Jin-Chi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7662382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33114783
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217849
_version_ 1783609387429920768
author Wang, Liang-Jie
Ma, Shuai
Qiao, Yong-Peng
Zhang, Jin-Chi
author_facet Wang, Liang-Jie
Ma, Shuai
Qiao, Yong-Peng
Zhang, Jin-Chi
author_sort Wang, Liang-Jie
collection PubMed
description Development of suitable ecological protection and restoration policies for sustainable management needs to assess the potential impacts of future land use and climate change on ecosystem services. The two ecological shelters and three belts (TSTB) are significant for improving ecosystem services and ensuring China’s and global ecological security. In this study, we simulated land use in 2050 and estimated the spatial distribution pattern of net primary productivity (NPP), water yield, and soil conservation from 2010 to 2050 under future climate change. The results showed that water yield, NPP, and soil conservation exhibited a spatial pattern of decreasing from southeast to northwest, while in terms of the temporal pattern, water yield and NPP increased, but soil conservation decreased. Water yield was mainly influenced by precipitation, NPP was affected by temperature and implementation of ecological restoration, and soil conservation was controlled by precipitation and slope. There was a strong spatial heterogeneity between trade-offs and synergies. In terms of the temporal, with the combination of climate change and ecological restoration, there was a synergistic relationship between water yield and NPP. However, the relationships between water yield and soil conservation, and between NPP and soil conservation were characterized by trade-offs. In the process of ecological construction, it is necessary to consider the differences between overall and local trade-offs and synergies, as well as formulate sustainable ecological management policies according to local conditions. Understanding the response of ecosystem services to future climate change and land use policies can help address the challenges posed by climate change and achieve sustainable management of natural resources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7662382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76623822020-11-14 Simulating the Impact of Future Climate Change and Ecological Restoration on Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Two Ecological Shelters and Three Belts in China Wang, Liang-Jie Ma, Shuai Qiao, Yong-Peng Zhang, Jin-Chi Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Development of suitable ecological protection and restoration policies for sustainable management needs to assess the potential impacts of future land use and climate change on ecosystem services. The two ecological shelters and three belts (TSTB) are significant for improving ecosystem services and ensuring China’s and global ecological security. In this study, we simulated land use in 2050 and estimated the spatial distribution pattern of net primary productivity (NPP), water yield, and soil conservation from 2010 to 2050 under future climate change. The results showed that water yield, NPP, and soil conservation exhibited a spatial pattern of decreasing from southeast to northwest, while in terms of the temporal pattern, water yield and NPP increased, but soil conservation decreased. Water yield was mainly influenced by precipitation, NPP was affected by temperature and implementation of ecological restoration, and soil conservation was controlled by precipitation and slope. There was a strong spatial heterogeneity between trade-offs and synergies. In terms of the temporal, with the combination of climate change and ecological restoration, there was a synergistic relationship between water yield and NPP. However, the relationships between water yield and soil conservation, and between NPP and soil conservation were characterized by trade-offs. In the process of ecological construction, it is necessary to consider the differences between overall and local trade-offs and synergies, as well as formulate sustainable ecological management policies according to local conditions. Understanding the response of ecosystem services to future climate change and land use policies can help address the challenges posed by climate change and achieve sustainable management of natural resources. MDPI 2020-10-26 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7662382/ /pubmed/33114783 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217849 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Liang-Jie
Ma, Shuai
Qiao, Yong-Peng
Zhang, Jin-Chi
Simulating the Impact of Future Climate Change and Ecological Restoration on Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Two Ecological Shelters and Three Belts in China
title Simulating the Impact of Future Climate Change and Ecological Restoration on Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Two Ecological Shelters and Three Belts in China
title_full Simulating the Impact of Future Climate Change and Ecological Restoration on Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Two Ecological Shelters and Three Belts in China
title_fullStr Simulating the Impact of Future Climate Change and Ecological Restoration on Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Two Ecological Shelters and Three Belts in China
title_full_unstemmed Simulating the Impact of Future Climate Change and Ecological Restoration on Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Two Ecological Shelters and Three Belts in China
title_short Simulating the Impact of Future Climate Change and Ecological Restoration on Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Two Ecological Shelters and Three Belts in China
title_sort simulating the impact of future climate change and ecological restoration on trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services in two ecological shelters and three belts in china
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7662382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33114783
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217849
work_keys_str_mv AT wangliangjie simulatingtheimpactoffutureclimatechangeandecologicalrestorationontradeoffsandsynergiesofecosystemservicesintwoecologicalsheltersandthreebeltsinchina
AT mashuai simulatingtheimpactoffutureclimatechangeandecologicalrestorationontradeoffsandsynergiesofecosystemservicesintwoecologicalsheltersandthreebeltsinchina
AT qiaoyongpeng simulatingtheimpactoffutureclimatechangeandecologicalrestorationontradeoffsandsynergiesofecosystemservicesintwoecologicalsheltersandthreebeltsinchina
AT zhangjinchi simulatingtheimpactoffutureclimatechangeandecologicalrestorationontradeoffsandsynergiesofecosystemservicesintwoecologicalsheltersandthreebeltsinchina