Cargando…

User redesign, testing and evaluation of the Monitoring Risk and Improving System Safety (MoRISS) checklist for the general practice work environment

BACKGROUND: Inadequate checking of safety-critical issues can compromise care quality in general practice (GP) work settings. Adopting a systemic, methodical approach may lead to improved standardisation of processes and reliability of task performance, strengthening the safety systems concerned. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bowie, Paul, de Wet, Carl, Crickett, Tracey, McCulloch, Jan, Young, Pauline, Freestone, John, Watson, Paul, Houston, Neil, Gillies, Jill, McNab, Duncan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7662415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33184042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000977
_version_ 1783609394538217472
author Bowie, Paul
de Wet, Carl
Crickett, Tracey
McCulloch, Jan
Young, Pauline
Freestone, John
Watson, Paul
Houston, Neil
Gillies, Jill
McNab, Duncan
author_facet Bowie, Paul
de Wet, Carl
Crickett, Tracey
McCulloch, Jan
Young, Pauline
Freestone, John
Watson, Paul
Houston, Neil
Gillies, Jill
McNab, Duncan
author_sort Bowie, Paul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inadequate checking of safety-critical issues can compromise care quality in general practice (GP) work settings. Adopting a systemic, methodical approach may lead to improved standardisation of processes and reliability of task performance, strengthening the safety systems concerned. This study aimed to revise, modify and test the content and relevance of a previously validated safety checklist to the current GP context. METHODS: A multimethod study was undertaken in Scottish GP involving: consensus building workshops with users and ‘experts’ to revise checklist content; regional testing of the modified checklist and follow-up usability evaluation survey of users. Quantitative data underwent descriptive statistical analyses and selected survey free-text comments are presented. RESULTS: A redesigned checklist tool consisting of eight themes (eg, medication safety) and 61 items (eg, out-of-date stock is appropriately disposed) was agreed by 53 users/experts with items reclassified as: mandatory (n=25), essential (n=24) and advisory (n=12). Totally 42/55 GPs tested the tool and submitted checklist data (76.4%). The mean aggregated results demonstrated 92.0% compliance with all 61 checklist items (range: 83.0%–98.0%) and 25/42 GP managers responded to the survey (59.5%) and reported high mean levels of agreement on the usefulness of the checklist (77.0%), ease of use (89.0%), learnability (94.0%) and satisfaction (78.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The checklist was comprehensively redesigned as a practical safety monitoring and improvement tool for potential implementation in Scottish GP. Testing and evaluation demonstrated high levels of checklist content compliance and strong usability feedback, but some variation was evident indicating room for improvement in current safety-critical checking processes. The checklist should be of interest in similar GP settings internationally and to other areas of primary care practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7662415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76624152020-11-20 User redesign, testing and evaluation of the Monitoring Risk and Improving System Safety (MoRISS) checklist for the general practice work environment Bowie, Paul de Wet, Carl Crickett, Tracey McCulloch, Jan Young, Pauline Freestone, John Watson, Paul Houston, Neil Gillies, Jill McNab, Duncan BMJ Open Qual Original Research BACKGROUND: Inadequate checking of safety-critical issues can compromise care quality in general practice (GP) work settings. Adopting a systemic, methodical approach may lead to improved standardisation of processes and reliability of task performance, strengthening the safety systems concerned. This study aimed to revise, modify and test the content and relevance of a previously validated safety checklist to the current GP context. METHODS: A multimethod study was undertaken in Scottish GP involving: consensus building workshops with users and ‘experts’ to revise checklist content; regional testing of the modified checklist and follow-up usability evaluation survey of users. Quantitative data underwent descriptive statistical analyses and selected survey free-text comments are presented. RESULTS: A redesigned checklist tool consisting of eight themes (eg, medication safety) and 61 items (eg, out-of-date stock is appropriately disposed) was agreed by 53 users/experts with items reclassified as: mandatory (n=25), essential (n=24) and advisory (n=12). Totally 42/55 GPs tested the tool and submitted checklist data (76.4%). The mean aggregated results demonstrated 92.0% compliance with all 61 checklist items (range: 83.0%–98.0%) and 25/42 GP managers responded to the survey (59.5%) and reported high mean levels of agreement on the usefulness of the checklist (77.0%), ease of use (89.0%), learnability (94.0%) and satisfaction (78.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The checklist was comprehensively redesigned as a practical safety monitoring and improvement tool for potential implementation in Scottish GP. Testing and evaluation demonstrated high levels of checklist content compliance and strong usability feedback, but some variation was evident indicating room for improvement in current safety-critical checking processes. The checklist should be of interest in similar GP settings internationally and to other areas of primary care practice. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7662415/ /pubmed/33184042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000977 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Bowie, Paul
de Wet, Carl
Crickett, Tracey
McCulloch, Jan
Young, Pauline
Freestone, John
Watson, Paul
Houston, Neil
Gillies, Jill
McNab, Duncan
User redesign, testing and evaluation of the Monitoring Risk and Improving System Safety (MoRISS) checklist for the general practice work environment
title User redesign, testing and evaluation of the Monitoring Risk and Improving System Safety (MoRISS) checklist for the general practice work environment
title_full User redesign, testing and evaluation of the Monitoring Risk and Improving System Safety (MoRISS) checklist for the general practice work environment
title_fullStr User redesign, testing and evaluation of the Monitoring Risk and Improving System Safety (MoRISS) checklist for the general practice work environment
title_full_unstemmed User redesign, testing and evaluation of the Monitoring Risk and Improving System Safety (MoRISS) checklist for the general practice work environment
title_short User redesign, testing and evaluation of the Monitoring Risk and Improving System Safety (MoRISS) checklist for the general practice work environment
title_sort user redesign, testing and evaluation of the monitoring risk and improving system safety (moriss) checklist for the general practice work environment
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7662415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33184042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000977
work_keys_str_mv AT bowiepaul userredesigntestingandevaluationofthemonitoringriskandimprovingsystemsafetymorisschecklistforthegeneralpracticeworkenvironment
AT dewetcarl userredesigntestingandevaluationofthemonitoringriskandimprovingsystemsafetymorisschecklistforthegeneralpracticeworkenvironment
AT cricketttracey userredesigntestingandevaluationofthemonitoringriskandimprovingsystemsafetymorisschecklistforthegeneralpracticeworkenvironment
AT mccullochjan userredesigntestingandevaluationofthemonitoringriskandimprovingsystemsafetymorisschecklistforthegeneralpracticeworkenvironment
AT youngpauline userredesigntestingandevaluationofthemonitoringriskandimprovingsystemsafetymorisschecklistforthegeneralpracticeworkenvironment
AT freestonejohn userredesigntestingandevaluationofthemonitoringriskandimprovingsystemsafetymorisschecklistforthegeneralpracticeworkenvironment
AT watsonpaul userredesigntestingandevaluationofthemonitoringriskandimprovingsystemsafetymorisschecklistforthegeneralpracticeworkenvironment
AT houstonneil userredesigntestingandevaluationofthemonitoringriskandimprovingsystemsafetymorisschecklistforthegeneralpracticeworkenvironment
AT gilliesjill userredesigntestingandevaluationofthemonitoringriskandimprovingsystemsafetymorisschecklistforthegeneralpracticeworkenvironment
AT mcnabduncan userredesigntestingandevaluationofthemonitoringriskandimprovingsystemsafetymorisschecklistforthegeneralpracticeworkenvironment