Cargando…
User redesign, testing and evaluation of the Monitoring Risk and Improving System Safety (MoRISS) checklist for the general practice work environment
BACKGROUND: Inadequate checking of safety-critical issues can compromise care quality in general practice (GP) work settings. Adopting a systemic, methodical approach may lead to improved standardisation of processes and reliability of task performance, strengthening the safety systems concerned. Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7662415/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33184042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000977 |
_version_ | 1783609394538217472 |
---|---|
author | Bowie, Paul de Wet, Carl Crickett, Tracey McCulloch, Jan Young, Pauline Freestone, John Watson, Paul Houston, Neil Gillies, Jill McNab, Duncan |
author_facet | Bowie, Paul de Wet, Carl Crickett, Tracey McCulloch, Jan Young, Pauline Freestone, John Watson, Paul Houston, Neil Gillies, Jill McNab, Duncan |
author_sort | Bowie, Paul |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Inadequate checking of safety-critical issues can compromise care quality in general practice (GP) work settings. Adopting a systemic, methodical approach may lead to improved standardisation of processes and reliability of task performance, strengthening the safety systems concerned. This study aimed to revise, modify and test the content and relevance of a previously validated safety checklist to the current GP context. METHODS: A multimethod study was undertaken in Scottish GP involving: consensus building workshops with users and ‘experts’ to revise checklist content; regional testing of the modified checklist and follow-up usability evaluation survey of users. Quantitative data underwent descriptive statistical analyses and selected survey free-text comments are presented. RESULTS: A redesigned checklist tool consisting of eight themes (eg, medication safety) and 61 items (eg, out-of-date stock is appropriately disposed) was agreed by 53 users/experts with items reclassified as: mandatory (n=25), essential (n=24) and advisory (n=12). Totally 42/55 GPs tested the tool and submitted checklist data (76.4%). The mean aggregated results demonstrated 92.0% compliance with all 61 checklist items (range: 83.0%–98.0%) and 25/42 GP managers responded to the survey (59.5%) and reported high mean levels of agreement on the usefulness of the checklist (77.0%), ease of use (89.0%), learnability (94.0%) and satisfaction (78.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The checklist was comprehensively redesigned as a practical safety monitoring and improvement tool for potential implementation in Scottish GP. Testing and evaluation demonstrated high levels of checklist content compliance and strong usability feedback, but some variation was evident indicating room for improvement in current safety-critical checking processes. The checklist should be of interest in similar GP settings internationally and to other areas of primary care practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7662415 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76624152020-11-20 User redesign, testing and evaluation of the Monitoring Risk and Improving System Safety (MoRISS) checklist for the general practice work environment Bowie, Paul de Wet, Carl Crickett, Tracey McCulloch, Jan Young, Pauline Freestone, John Watson, Paul Houston, Neil Gillies, Jill McNab, Duncan BMJ Open Qual Original Research BACKGROUND: Inadequate checking of safety-critical issues can compromise care quality in general practice (GP) work settings. Adopting a systemic, methodical approach may lead to improved standardisation of processes and reliability of task performance, strengthening the safety systems concerned. This study aimed to revise, modify and test the content and relevance of a previously validated safety checklist to the current GP context. METHODS: A multimethod study was undertaken in Scottish GP involving: consensus building workshops with users and ‘experts’ to revise checklist content; regional testing of the modified checklist and follow-up usability evaluation survey of users. Quantitative data underwent descriptive statistical analyses and selected survey free-text comments are presented. RESULTS: A redesigned checklist tool consisting of eight themes (eg, medication safety) and 61 items (eg, out-of-date stock is appropriately disposed) was agreed by 53 users/experts with items reclassified as: mandatory (n=25), essential (n=24) and advisory (n=12). Totally 42/55 GPs tested the tool and submitted checklist data (76.4%). The mean aggregated results demonstrated 92.0% compliance with all 61 checklist items (range: 83.0%–98.0%) and 25/42 GP managers responded to the survey (59.5%) and reported high mean levels of agreement on the usefulness of the checklist (77.0%), ease of use (89.0%), learnability (94.0%) and satisfaction (78.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The checklist was comprehensively redesigned as a practical safety monitoring and improvement tool for potential implementation in Scottish GP. Testing and evaluation demonstrated high levels of checklist content compliance and strong usability feedback, but some variation was evident indicating room for improvement in current safety-critical checking processes. The checklist should be of interest in similar GP settings internationally and to other areas of primary care practice. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7662415/ /pubmed/33184042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000977 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Bowie, Paul de Wet, Carl Crickett, Tracey McCulloch, Jan Young, Pauline Freestone, John Watson, Paul Houston, Neil Gillies, Jill McNab, Duncan User redesign, testing and evaluation of the Monitoring Risk and Improving System Safety (MoRISS) checklist for the general practice work environment |
title | User redesign, testing and evaluation of the Monitoring Risk and Improving System Safety (MoRISS) checklist for the general practice work environment |
title_full | User redesign, testing and evaluation of the Monitoring Risk and Improving System Safety (MoRISS) checklist for the general practice work environment |
title_fullStr | User redesign, testing and evaluation of the Monitoring Risk and Improving System Safety (MoRISS) checklist for the general practice work environment |
title_full_unstemmed | User redesign, testing and evaluation of the Monitoring Risk and Improving System Safety (MoRISS) checklist for the general practice work environment |
title_short | User redesign, testing and evaluation of the Monitoring Risk and Improving System Safety (MoRISS) checklist for the general practice work environment |
title_sort | user redesign, testing and evaluation of the monitoring risk and improving system safety (moriss) checklist for the general practice work environment |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7662415/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33184042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000977 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bowiepaul userredesigntestingandevaluationofthemonitoringriskandimprovingsystemsafetymorisschecklistforthegeneralpracticeworkenvironment AT dewetcarl userredesigntestingandevaluationofthemonitoringriskandimprovingsystemsafetymorisschecklistforthegeneralpracticeworkenvironment AT cricketttracey userredesigntestingandevaluationofthemonitoringriskandimprovingsystemsafetymorisschecklistforthegeneralpracticeworkenvironment AT mccullochjan userredesigntestingandevaluationofthemonitoringriskandimprovingsystemsafetymorisschecklistforthegeneralpracticeworkenvironment AT youngpauline userredesigntestingandevaluationofthemonitoringriskandimprovingsystemsafetymorisschecklistforthegeneralpracticeworkenvironment AT freestonejohn userredesigntestingandevaluationofthemonitoringriskandimprovingsystemsafetymorisschecklistforthegeneralpracticeworkenvironment AT watsonpaul userredesigntestingandevaluationofthemonitoringriskandimprovingsystemsafetymorisschecklistforthegeneralpracticeworkenvironment AT houstonneil userredesigntestingandevaluationofthemonitoringriskandimprovingsystemsafetymorisschecklistforthegeneralpracticeworkenvironment AT gilliesjill userredesigntestingandevaluationofthemonitoringriskandimprovingsystemsafetymorisschecklistforthegeneralpracticeworkenvironment AT mcnabduncan userredesigntestingandevaluationofthemonitoringriskandimprovingsystemsafetymorisschecklistforthegeneralpracticeworkenvironment |