Cargando…

Impact of clinical versus radiographic progression on clinical outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES: Unequivocal clinical progression (UCP)—a worsening of clinical status with or without radiographic progression (RAD)—represents a distinct mode of disease progression in metastatic prostate cancer. We evaluated the prevalence, risk factors and the impact of UCP on survival outcomes. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rao, Arpit, Scher, Howard I, De Porre, Peter, Yu, Margaret K, Londhe, Anil, Qi, Keqin, Morris, Michael J, Ryan, Charles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7662417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33184097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000943
_version_ 1783609394763661312
author Rao, Arpit
Scher, Howard I
De Porre, Peter
Yu, Margaret K
Londhe, Anil
Qi, Keqin
Morris, Michael J
Ryan, Charles
author_facet Rao, Arpit
Scher, Howard I
De Porre, Peter
Yu, Margaret K
Londhe, Anil
Qi, Keqin
Morris, Michael J
Ryan, Charles
author_sort Rao, Arpit
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Unequivocal clinical progression (UCP)—a worsening of clinical status with or without radiographic progression (RAD)—represents a distinct mode of disease progression in metastatic prostate cancer. We evaluated the prevalence, risk factors and the impact of UCP on survival outcomes. METHODS: A post-hoc analysis of the COU-AA-302, a randomised phase 3 study of abiraterone plus prednisone (AAP) versus prednisone was performed. Baseline characteristics were summarised. Cox proportional-hazards model and Kaplan-Meier method were used for survival and time to event analyses, respectively. Iterative multiple imputation method was used for correlation between clinicoradiographic progression-free survival (crPFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 736 patients with disease progression, 280 (38%) had UCP-only and 124 (17%) had UCP plus RAD. Prognostic index model high-risk group was associated with increased likelihood of UCP (p<0.0001). Median OS was 25.7 months in UCP-only and 33.0 months for RAD-only (HR 1.39; 95% CI 1.16 to 1.66; p=0.0003). UCP adversely impacted OS in both treatment groups. Lowest OS was seen in patients with prostate specific antigen (PSA)-non-response plus UCP-only progression (median OS 22.6 months (95% CI 20.7 to 24.4)). Including UCP events lowered estimates of treatment benefit—median crPFS was 13.3 months (95% CI 11.1 to 13.8) versus median rPFS of 16.5 months (95% CI 13.8 to 16.8) in AAP group. Finally, crPFS showed high correlation with OS (r=0.67; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: UCP is a common and clinically relevant phenomenon in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with AAP or prednisone. UCP is prognostic and associated with inferior OS and post-progression survival. A combination of PSA-non-response and UCP identifies patients with poorest survival. When included in PFS analysis, UCP diminishes estimates of treatment benefit. Continued study of UCP in mCRPC is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7662417
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76624172020-11-20 Impact of clinical versus radiographic progression on clinical outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer Rao, Arpit Scher, Howard I De Porre, Peter Yu, Margaret K Londhe, Anil Qi, Keqin Morris, Michael J Ryan, Charles ESMO Open Original Research OBJECTIVES: Unequivocal clinical progression (UCP)—a worsening of clinical status with or without radiographic progression (RAD)—represents a distinct mode of disease progression in metastatic prostate cancer. We evaluated the prevalence, risk factors and the impact of UCP on survival outcomes. METHODS: A post-hoc analysis of the COU-AA-302, a randomised phase 3 study of abiraterone plus prednisone (AAP) versus prednisone was performed. Baseline characteristics were summarised. Cox proportional-hazards model and Kaplan-Meier method were used for survival and time to event analyses, respectively. Iterative multiple imputation method was used for correlation between clinicoradiographic progression-free survival (crPFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 736 patients with disease progression, 280 (38%) had UCP-only and 124 (17%) had UCP plus RAD. Prognostic index model high-risk group was associated with increased likelihood of UCP (p<0.0001). Median OS was 25.7 months in UCP-only and 33.0 months for RAD-only (HR 1.39; 95% CI 1.16 to 1.66; p=0.0003). UCP adversely impacted OS in both treatment groups. Lowest OS was seen in patients with prostate specific antigen (PSA)-non-response plus UCP-only progression (median OS 22.6 months (95% CI 20.7 to 24.4)). Including UCP events lowered estimates of treatment benefit—median crPFS was 13.3 months (95% CI 11.1 to 13.8) versus median rPFS of 16.5 months (95% CI 13.8 to 16.8) in AAP group. Finally, crPFS showed high correlation with OS (r=0.67; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: UCP is a common and clinically relevant phenomenon in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with AAP or prednisone. UCP is prognostic and associated with inferior OS and post-progression survival. A combination of PSA-non-response and UCP identifies patients with poorest survival. When included in PFS analysis, UCP diminishes estimates of treatment benefit. Continued study of UCP in mCRPC is warranted. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7662417/ /pubmed/33184097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000943 Text en © Author (s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, any changes made are indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Rao, Arpit
Scher, Howard I
De Porre, Peter
Yu, Margaret K
Londhe, Anil
Qi, Keqin
Morris, Michael J
Ryan, Charles
Impact of clinical versus radiographic progression on clinical outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
title Impact of clinical versus radiographic progression on clinical outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
title_full Impact of clinical versus radiographic progression on clinical outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
title_fullStr Impact of clinical versus radiographic progression on clinical outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Impact of clinical versus radiographic progression on clinical outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
title_short Impact of clinical versus radiographic progression on clinical outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
title_sort impact of clinical versus radiographic progression on clinical outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7662417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33184097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000943
work_keys_str_mv AT raoarpit impactofclinicalversusradiographicprogressiononclinicaloutcomesinmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancer
AT scherhowardi impactofclinicalversusradiographicprogressiononclinicaloutcomesinmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancer
AT deporrepeter impactofclinicalversusradiographicprogressiononclinicaloutcomesinmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancer
AT yumargaretk impactofclinicalversusradiographicprogressiononclinicaloutcomesinmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancer
AT londheanil impactofclinicalversusradiographicprogressiononclinicaloutcomesinmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancer
AT qikeqin impactofclinicalversusradiographicprogressiononclinicaloutcomesinmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancer
AT morrismichaelj impactofclinicalversusradiographicprogressiononclinicaloutcomesinmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancer
AT ryancharles impactofclinicalversusradiographicprogressiononclinicaloutcomesinmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancer