Cargando…

Which moral barriers and facilitators do physicians encounter in advance care planning conversations about the end of life of persons with dementia? A meta-review of systematic reviews and primary studies

IMPORTANCE AND OBJECTIVE: Conducting advance care planning (ACP) conversations with people with dementia and their relatives contributes to providing care according to their preferences. In this review, we identify moral considerations which may hinder or facilitate physicians in conducting ACP in d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keijzer-van Laarhoven, Angela JJM, Touwen, Dorothea P, Tilburgs, Bram, van Tilborg-den Boeft, Madelon, Pees, Claudia, Achterberg, Wilco P, van der Steen, Jenny T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7662455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33184079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038528
_version_ 1783609402993934336
author Keijzer-van Laarhoven, Angela JJM
Touwen, Dorothea P
Tilburgs, Bram
van Tilborg-den Boeft, Madelon
Pees, Claudia
Achterberg, Wilco P
van der Steen, Jenny T
author_facet Keijzer-van Laarhoven, Angela JJM
Touwen, Dorothea P
Tilburgs, Bram
van Tilborg-den Boeft, Madelon
Pees, Claudia
Achterberg, Wilco P
van der Steen, Jenny T
author_sort Keijzer-van Laarhoven, Angela JJM
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE AND OBJECTIVE: Conducting advance care planning (ACP) conversations with people with dementia and their relatives contributes to providing care according to their preferences. In this review, we identify moral considerations which may hinder or facilitate physicians in conducting ACP in dementia. DESIGN: For this meta-review of systematic reviews and primary studies, we searched the PubMed, Web of Science and PsycINFO databases between 2005 and 30 August 2019. We included empirical studies concerning physicians’ moral barriers and facilitators of conversations about end-of-life preferences in dementia care. The protocol was registered at Prospero (CRD42019123308). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Physicians and nurse practitioners providing medical care to people with dementia in long-term and primary care settings. We also include observations from patients or family caregivers witnessing physicians’ moral considerations. MAIN OUTCOMES: Physicians’ moral considerations involving ethical dilemmas for ACP. We define moral considerations as the weighing by the professional caregiver of values and norms aimed at providing good care that promotes the fundamental interests of the people involved and which possibly ensues dilemmas. RESULTS: Of 1347 studies, we assessed 22 systematic reviews and 51 primary studies as full texts. We included 11 systematic reviews and 13 primary studies. Themes included: (1) beneficence and non-maleficence; (2) respecting dignity; (3) responsibility and ownership; (4) relationship and (5) courage. Moral dilemmas related to the physician as a professional and as a person. For most themes, there were considerations that either facilitated or hindered ACP, depending on physician’s interpretation or the context. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians feel a responsibility to provide high-quality end-of-life care to patients with dementia. However, the moral dilemmas this may involve, can lead to avoidant behaviour concerning ACP. If these dilemmas are not recognised, discussed and taken into account, implementation of ACP as a process between physicians, persons with dementia and their family caregivers may fail.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7662455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76624552020-11-20 Which moral barriers and facilitators do physicians encounter in advance care planning conversations about the end of life of persons with dementia? A meta-review of systematic reviews and primary studies Keijzer-van Laarhoven, Angela JJM Touwen, Dorothea P Tilburgs, Bram van Tilborg-den Boeft, Madelon Pees, Claudia Achterberg, Wilco P van der Steen, Jenny T BMJ Open Ethics IMPORTANCE AND OBJECTIVE: Conducting advance care planning (ACP) conversations with people with dementia and their relatives contributes to providing care according to their preferences. In this review, we identify moral considerations which may hinder or facilitate physicians in conducting ACP in dementia. DESIGN: For this meta-review of systematic reviews and primary studies, we searched the PubMed, Web of Science and PsycINFO databases between 2005 and 30 August 2019. We included empirical studies concerning physicians’ moral barriers and facilitators of conversations about end-of-life preferences in dementia care. The protocol was registered at Prospero (CRD42019123308). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Physicians and nurse practitioners providing medical care to people with dementia in long-term and primary care settings. We also include observations from patients or family caregivers witnessing physicians’ moral considerations. MAIN OUTCOMES: Physicians’ moral considerations involving ethical dilemmas for ACP. We define moral considerations as the weighing by the professional caregiver of values and norms aimed at providing good care that promotes the fundamental interests of the people involved and which possibly ensues dilemmas. RESULTS: Of 1347 studies, we assessed 22 systematic reviews and 51 primary studies as full texts. We included 11 systematic reviews and 13 primary studies. Themes included: (1) beneficence and non-maleficence; (2) respecting dignity; (3) responsibility and ownership; (4) relationship and (5) courage. Moral dilemmas related to the physician as a professional and as a person. For most themes, there were considerations that either facilitated or hindered ACP, depending on physician’s interpretation or the context. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians feel a responsibility to provide high-quality end-of-life care to patients with dementia. However, the moral dilemmas this may involve, can lead to avoidant behaviour concerning ACP. If these dilemmas are not recognised, discussed and taken into account, implementation of ACP as a process between physicians, persons with dementia and their family caregivers may fail. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7662455/ /pubmed/33184079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038528 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Ethics
Keijzer-van Laarhoven, Angela JJM
Touwen, Dorothea P
Tilburgs, Bram
van Tilborg-den Boeft, Madelon
Pees, Claudia
Achterberg, Wilco P
van der Steen, Jenny T
Which moral barriers and facilitators do physicians encounter in advance care planning conversations about the end of life of persons with dementia? A meta-review of systematic reviews and primary studies
title Which moral barriers and facilitators do physicians encounter in advance care planning conversations about the end of life of persons with dementia? A meta-review of systematic reviews and primary studies
title_full Which moral barriers and facilitators do physicians encounter in advance care planning conversations about the end of life of persons with dementia? A meta-review of systematic reviews and primary studies
title_fullStr Which moral barriers and facilitators do physicians encounter in advance care planning conversations about the end of life of persons with dementia? A meta-review of systematic reviews and primary studies
title_full_unstemmed Which moral barriers and facilitators do physicians encounter in advance care planning conversations about the end of life of persons with dementia? A meta-review of systematic reviews and primary studies
title_short Which moral barriers and facilitators do physicians encounter in advance care planning conversations about the end of life of persons with dementia? A meta-review of systematic reviews and primary studies
title_sort which moral barriers and facilitators do physicians encounter in advance care planning conversations about the end of life of persons with dementia? a meta-review of systematic reviews and primary studies
topic Ethics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7662455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33184079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038528
work_keys_str_mv AT keijzervanlaarhovenangelajjm whichmoralbarriersandfacilitatorsdophysiciansencounterinadvancecareplanningconversationsabouttheendoflifeofpersonswithdementiaametareviewofsystematicreviewsandprimarystudies
AT touwendorotheap whichmoralbarriersandfacilitatorsdophysiciansencounterinadvancecareplanningconversationsabouttheendoflifeofpersonswithdementiaametareviewofsystematicreviewsandprimarystudies
AT tilburgsbram whichmoralbarriersandfacilitatorsdophysiciansencounterinadvancecareplanningconversationsabouttheendoflifeofpersonswithdementiaametareviewofsystematicreviewsandprimarystudies
AT vantilborgdenboeftmadelon whichmoralbarriersandfacilitatorsdophysiciansencounterinadvancecareplanningconversationsabouttheendoflifeofpersonswithdementiaametareviewofsystematicreviewsandprimarystudies
AT peesclaudia whichmoralbarriersandfacilitatorsdophysiciansencounterinadvancecareplanningconversationsabouttheendoflifeofpersonswithdementiaametareviewofsystematicreviewsandprimarystudies
AT achterbergwilcop whichmoralbarriersandfacilitatorsdophysiciansencounterinadvancecareplanningconversationsabouttheendoflifeofpersonswithdementiaametareviewofsystematicreviewsandprimarystudies
AT vandersteenjennyt whichmoralbarriersandfacilitatorsdophysiciansencounterinadvancecareplanningconversationsabouttheendoflifeofpersonswithdementiaametareviewofsystematicreviewsandprimarystudies