Cargando…

Contrasting vulnerability of monospecific and species‐diverse forests to wind and bark beetle disturbance: The role of management

1. Wind and bark beetle disturbances have increased in recent decades, affecting Europe's coniferous forests with particular severity. Management fostering forest diversity and resilience is deemed to effectively mitigate disturbance impacts, yet its efficiency and interaction with other distur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dobor, Laura, Hlásny, Tomáš, Zimová, Soňa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7663067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33209284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6854
_version_ 1783609540832395264
author Dobor, Laura
Hlásny, Tomáš
Zimová, Soňa
author_facet Dobor, Laura
Hlásny, Tomáš
Zimová, Soňa
author_sort Dobor, Laura
collection PubMed
description 1. Wind and bark beetle disturbances have increased in recent decades, affecting Europe's coniferous forests with particular severity. Management fostering forest diversity and resilience is deemed to effectively mitigate disturbance impacts, yet its efficiency and interaction with other disturbance management measures remain unclear. 2. We focused on Central Europe, which has become one of the hotspots of recent disturbance changes. We used the iLand ecosystem model to understand the interplay between species composition of the forest, forest disturbance dynamics affected by climate change, and disturbance management. The tested measures included (a) active transformation of tree species composition toward site‐matching species; (b) intensive removal of windfelled trees, which can support the buildup of bark beetle populations; and (c) reduction of mature and vulnerable trees on the landscape via modified harvesting regimes. 3. We found that management systems aiming to sustain the dominance of Norway spruce in the forest are failing under climate change, and none of the measures applied could mitigate the disturbance impacts. Conversely, management systems fostering forest diversity substantially reduced the level of disturbance. Significant disturbance reduction has been achieved even without salvaging and rotation length reduction, which is beneficial for ecosystem recovery, carbon, and biodiversity. 4. Synthesis and applications: We conclude that climate change amplifies the contrast in vulnerability of monospecific and species‐diverse forests to wind and bark beetle disturbance. Whereas forests dominated by Norway spruce are not likely to be sustained in Central Europe under climate change, different management strategies can be applied in species‐diverse forests to reach the desired control over the disturbance dynamic. Our findings justify some unrealistic expectations about the options to control disturbance dynamics under climate change and highlight the importance of management that fosters forest diversity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7663067
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76630672020-11-17 Contrasting vulnerability of monospecific and species‐diverse forests to wind and bark beetle disturbance: The role of management Dobor, Laura Hlásny, Tomáš Zimová, Soňa Ecol Evol Original Research 1. Wind and bark beetle disturbances have increased in recent decades, affecting Europe's coniferous forests with particular severity. Management fostering forest diversity and resilience is deemed to effectively mitigate disturbance impacts, yet its efficiency and interaction with other disturbance management measures remain unclear. 2. We focused on Central Europe, which has become one of the hotspots of recent disturbance changes. We used the iLand ecosystem model to understand the interplay between species composition of the forest, forest disturbance dynamics affected by climate change, and disturbance management. The tested measures included (a) active transformation of tree species composition toward site‐matching species; (b) intensive removal of windfelled trees, which can support the buildup of bark beetle populations; and (c) reduction of mature and vulnerable trees on the landscape via modified harvesting regimes. 3. We found that management systems aiming to sustain the dominance of Norway spruce in the forest are failing under climate change, and none of the measures applied could mitigate the disturbance impacts. Conversely, management systems fostering forest diversity substantially reduced the level of disturbance. Significant disturbance reduction has been achieved even without salvaging and rotation length reduction, which is beneficial for ecosystem recovery, carbon, and biodiversity. 4. Synthesis and applications: We conclude that climate change amplifies the contrast in vulnerability of monospecific and species‐diverse forests to wind and bark beetle disturbance. Whereas forests dominated by Norway spruce are not likely to be sustained in Central Europe under climate change, different management strategies can be applied in species‐diverse forests to reach the desired control over the disturbance dynamic. Our findings justify some unrealistic expectations about the options to control disturbance dynamics under climate change and highlight the importance of management that fosters forest diversity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7663067/ /pubmed/33209284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6854 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Dobor, Laura
Hlásny, Tomáš
Zimová, Soňa
Contrasting vulnerability of monospecific and species‐diverse forests to wind and bark beetle disturbance: The role of management
title Contrasting vulnerability of monospecific and species‐diverse forests to wind and bark beetle disturbance: The role of management
title_full Contrasting vulnerability of monospecific and species‐diverse forests to wind and bark beetle disturbance: The role of management
title_fullStr Contrasting vulnerability of monospecific and species‐diverse forests to wind and bark beetle disturbance: The role of management
title_full_unstemmed Contrasting vulnerability of monospecific and species‐diverse forests to wind and bark beetle disturbance: The role of management
title_short Contrasting vulnerability of monospecific and species‐diverse forests to wind and bark beetle disturbance: The role of management
title_sort contrasting vulnerability of monospecific and species‐diverse forests to wind and bark beetle disturbance: the role of management
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7663067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33209284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6854
work_keys_str_mv AT doborlaura contrastingvulnerabilityofmonospecificandspeciesdiverseforeststowindandbarkbeetledisturbancetheroleofmanagement
AT hlasnytomas contrastingvulnerabilityofmonospecificandspeciesdiverseforeststowindandbarkbeetledisturbancetheroleofmanagement
AT zimovasona contrastingvulnerabilityofmonospecificandspeciesdiverseforeststowindandbarkbeetledisturbancetheroleofmanagement