Cargando…
Contrasting vulnerability of monospecific and species‐diverse forests to wind and bark beetle disturbance: The role of management
1. Wind and bark beetle disturbances have increased in recent decades, affecting Europe's coniferous forests with particular severity. Management fostering forest diversity and resilience is deemed to effectively mitigate disturbance impacts, yet its efficiency and interaction with other distur...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7663067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33209284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6854 |
_version_ | 1783609540832395264 |
---|---|
author | Dobor, Laura Hlásny, Tomáš Zimová, Soňa |
author_facet | Dobor, Laura Hlásny, Tomáš Zimová, Soňa |
author_sort | Dobor, Laura |
collection | PubMed |
description | 1. Wind and bark beetle disturbances have increased in recent decades, affecting Europe's coniferous forests with particular severity. Management fostering forest diversity and resilience is deemed to effectively mitigate disturbance impacts, yet its efficiency and interaction with other disturbance management measures remain unclear. 2. We focused on Central Europe, which has become one of the hotspots of recent disturbance changes. We used the iLand ecosystem model to understand the interplay between species composition of the forest, forest disturbance dynamics affected by climate change, and disturbance management. The tested measures included (a) active transformation of tree species composition toward site‐matching species; (b) intensive removal of windfelled trees, which can support the buildup of bark beetle populations; and (c) reduction of mature and vulnerable trees on the landscape via modified harvesting regimes. 3. We found that management systems aiming to sustain the dominance of Norway spruce in the forest are failing under climate change, and none of the measures applied could mitigate the disturbance impacts. Conversely, management systems fostering forest diversity substantially reduced the level of disturbance. Significant disturbance reduction has been achieved even without salvaging and rotation length reduction, which is beneficial for ecosystem recovery, carbon, and biodiversity. 4. Synthesis and applications: We conclude that climate change amplifies the contrast in vulnerability of monospecific and species‐diverse forests to wind and bark beetle disturbance. Whereas forests dominated by Norway spruce are not likely to be sustained in Central Europe under climate change, different management strategies can be applied in species‐diverse forests to reach the desired control over the disturbance dynamic. Our findings justify some unrealistic expectations about the options to control disturbance dynamics under climate change and highlight the importance of management that fosters forest diversity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7663067 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76630672020-11-17 Contrasting vulnerability of monospecific and species‐diverse forests to wind and bark beetle disturbance: The role of management Dobor, Laura Hlásny, Tomáš Zimová, Soňa Ecol Evol Original Research 1. Wind and bark beetle disturbances have increased in recent decades, affecting Europe's coniferous forests with particular severity. Management fostering forest diversity and resilience is deemed to effectively mitigate disturbance impacts, yet its efficiency and interaction with other disturbance management measures remain unclear. 2. We focused on Central Europe, which has become one of the hotspots of recent disturbance changes. We used the iLand ecosystem model to understand the interplay between species composition of the forest, forest disturbance dynamics affected by climate change, and disturbance management. The tested measures included (a) active transformation of tree species composition toward site‐matching species; (b) intensive removal of windfelled trees, which can support the buildup of bark beetle populations; and (c) reduction of mature and vulnerable trees on the landscape via modified harvesting regimes. 3. We found that management systems aiming to sustain the dominance of Norway spruce in the forest are failing under climate change, and none of the measures applied could mitigate the disturbance impacts. Conversely, management systems fostering forest diversity substantially reduced the level of disturbance. Significant disturbance reduction has been achieved even without salvaging and rotation length reduction, which is beneficial for ecosystem recovery, carbon, and biodiversity. 4. Synthesis and applications: We conclude that climate change amplifies the contrast in vulnerability of monospecific and species‐diverse forests to wind and bark beetle disturbance. Whereas forests dominated by Norway spruce are not likely to be sustained in Central Europe under climate change, different management strategies can be applied in species‐diverse forests to reach the desired control over the disturbance dynamic. Our findings justify some unrealistic expectations about the options to control disturbance dynamics under climate change and highlight the importance of management that fosters forest diversity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7663067/ /pubmed/33209284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6854 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Dobor, Laura Hlásny, Tomáš Zimová, Soňa Contrasting vulnerability of monospecific and species‐diverse forests to wind and bark beetle disturbance: The role of management |
title | Contrasting vulnerability of monospecific and species‐diverse forests to wind and bark beetle disturbance: The role of management |
title_full | Contrasting vulnerability of monospecific and species‐diverse forests to wind and bark beetle disturbance: The role of management |
title_fullStr | Contrasting vulnerability of monospecific and species‐diverse forests to wind and bark beetle disturbance: The role of management |
title_full_unstemmed | Contrasting vulnerability of monospecific and species‐diverse forests to wind and bark beetle disturbance: The role of management |
title_short | Contrasting vulnerability of monospecific and species‐diverse forests to wind and bark beetle disturbance: The role of management |
title_sort | contrasting vulnerability of monospecific and species‐diverse forests to wind and bark beetle disturbance: the role of management |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7663067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33209284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6854 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT doborlaura contrastingvulnerabilityofmonospecificandspeciesdiverseforeststowindandbarkbeetledisturbancetheroleofmanagement AT hlasnytomas contrastingvulnerabilityofmonospecificandspeciesdiverseforeststowindandbarkbeetledisturbancetheroleofmanagement AT zimovasona contrastingvulnerabilityofmonospecificandspeciesdiverseforeststowindandbarkbeetledisturbancetheroleofmanagement |