Cargando…

A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Techniques in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)

Machine learning techniques are widely used nowadays in the healthcare domain for the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of diseases. These techniques have applications in the field of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), which is a potentially curative therapy for hematological malignancies....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Vibhuti, Braun, Thomas M., Chowdhury, Mosharaf, Tewari, Muneesh, Choi, Sung Won
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7663237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33120974
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20216100
_version_ 1783609581000196096
author Gupta, Vibhuti
Braun, Thomas M.
Chowdhury, Mosharaf
Tewari, Muneesh
Choi, Sung Won
author_facet Gupta, Vibhuti
Braun, Thomas M.
Chowdhury, Mosharaf
Tewari, Muneesh
Choi, Sung Won
author_sort Gupta, Vibhuti
collection PubMed
description Machine learning techniques are widely used nowadays in the healthcare domain for the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of diseases. These techniques have applications in the field of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), which is a potentially curative therapy for hematological malignancies. Herein, a systematic review of the application of machine learning (ML) techniques in the HCT setting was conducted. We examined the type of data streams included, specific ML techniques used, and type of clinical outcomes measured. A systematic review of English articles using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore databases was performed. Search terms included “hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT),” “autologous HCT,” “allogeneic HCT,” “machine learning,” and “artificial intelligence.” Only full-text studies reported between January 2015 and July 2020 were included. Data were extracted by two authors using predefined data fields. Following PRISMA guidelines, a total of 242 studies were identified, of which 27 studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies were sub-categorized into three broad topics and the type of ML techniques used included ensemble learning (63%), regression (44%), Bayesian learning (30%), and support vector machine (30%). The majority of studies examined models to predict HCT outcomes (e.g., survival, relapse, graft-versus-host disease). Clinical and genetic data were the most commonly used predictors in the modeling process. Overall, this review provided a systematic review of ML techniques applied in the context of HCT. The evidence is not sufficiently robust to determine the optimal ML technique to use in the HCT setting and/or what minimal data variables are required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7663237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76632372020-11-14 A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Techniques in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) Gupta, Vibhuti Braun, Thomas M. Chowdhury, Mosharaf Tewari, Muneesh Choi, Sung Won Sensors (Basel) Review Machine learning techniques are widely used nowadays in the healthcare domain for the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of diseases. These techniques have applications in the field of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), which is a potentially curative therapy for hematological malignancies. Herein, a systematic review of the application of machine learning (ML) techniques in the HCT setting was conducted. We examined the type of data streams included, specific ML techniques used, and type of clinical outcomes measured. A systematic review of English articles using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore databases was performed. Search terms included “hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT),” “autologous HCT,” “allogeneic HCT,” “machine learning,” and “artificial intelligence.” Only full-text studies reported between January 2015 and July 2020 were included. Data were extracted by two authors using predefined data fields. Following PRISMA guidelines, a total of 242 studies were identified, of which 27 studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies were sub-categorized into three broad topics and the type of ML techniques used included ensemble learning (63%), regression (44%), Bayesian learning (30%), and support vector machine (30%). The majority of studies examined models to predict HCT outcomes (e.g., survival, relapse, graft-versus-host disease). Clinical and genetic data were the most commonly used predictors in the modeling process. Overall, this review provided a systematic review of ML techniques applied in the context of HCT. The evidence is not sufficiently robust to determine the optimal ML technique to use in the HCT setting and/or what minimal data variables are required. MDPI 2020-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7663237/ /pubmed/33120974 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20216100 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Gupta, Vibhuti
Braun, Thomas M.
Chowdhury, Mosharaf
Tewari, Muneesh
Choi, Sung Won
A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Techniques in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)
title A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Techniques in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)
title_full A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Techniques in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Techniques in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Techniques in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)
title_short A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Techniques in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)
title_sort systematic review of machine learning techniques in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (hsct)
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7663237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33120974
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20216100
work_keys_str_mv AT guptavibhuti asystematicreviewofmachinelearningtechniquesinhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationhsct
AT braunthomasm asystematicreviewofmachinelearningtechniquesinhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationhsct
AT chowdhurymosharaf asystematicreviewofmachinelearningtechniquesinhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationhsct
AT tewarimuneesh asystematicreviewofmachinelearningtechniquesinhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationhsct
AT choisungwon asystematicreviewofmachinelearningtechniquesinhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationhsct
AT guptavibhuti systematicreviewofmachinelearningtechniquesinhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationhsct
AT braunthomasm systematicreviewofmachinelearningtechniquesinhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationhsct
AT chowdhurymosharaf systematicreviewofmachinelearningtechniquesinhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationhsct
AT tewarimuneesh systematicreviewofmachinelearningtechniquesinhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationhsct
AT choisungwon systematicreviewofmachinelearningtechniquesinhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationhsct