Cargando…
The Dual Function Model of Attachment Security Priming: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Evidence
According to attachment theory, security providing attachment figures fulfill two main functions: (1) safe haven—providing safety and comfort and reducing stress—helping people regain a sense of security; and (2) secure base—providing resources and a base from which people can spring into action. Ac...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7663451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33153077 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218093 |
_version_ | 1783609630133321728 |
---|---|
author | Ai, Ting Gillath, Omri Karantzas, Gery C. |
author_facet | Ai, Ting Gillath, Omri Karantzas, Gery C. |
author_sort | Ai, Ting |
collection | PubMed |
description | According to attachment theory, security providing attachment figures fulfill two main functions: (1) safe haven—providing safety and comfort and reducing stress—helping people regain a sense of security; and (2) secure base—providing resources and a base from which people can spring into action. According to the Dual Function of Security Priming Model, security priming can result in one of two outcomes paralleling these two functions. Which outcome is likely to present itself depends on the level of stress imposed by the context. Here we describe the Dual Function Model of Security Priming (DFSP) Model and provide evidence from a study examining the effects of attachment security priming on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal activity. In the study, participants were exposed to security-related cues under high or low/no-stress conditions, while their salivary cortisol concentrations were measured. Cortisol is a suitable index as it is released not only in response to stress, but also more generally when energy needs to be mobilized. We found that while security priming led to significant decreases in salivary cortisol concentrations when presented after a stressor (stress reduction), it led to a significant increase in salivary cortisol concentrations when presented before the stressor (energy mobilization). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7663451 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76634512020-11-14 The Dual Function Model of Attachment Security Priming: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Evidence Ai, Ting Gillath, Omri Karantzas, Gery C. Int J Environ Res Public Health Project Report According to attachment theory, security providing attachment figures fulfill two main functions: (1) safe haven—providing safety and comfort and reducing stress—helping people regain a sense of security; and (2) secure base—providing resources and a base from which people can spring into action. According to the Dual Function of Security Priming Model, security priming can result in one of two outcomes paralleling these two functions. Which outcome is likely to present itself depends on the level of stress imposed by the context. Here we describe the Dual Function Model of Security Priming (DFSP) Model and provide evidence from a study examining the effects of attachment security priming on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal activity. In the study, participants were exposed to security-related cues under high or low/no-stress conditions, while their salivary cortisol concentrations were measured. Cortisol is a suitable index as it is released not only in response to stress, but also more generally when energy needs to be mobilized. We found that while security priming led to significant decreases in salivary cortisol concentrations when presented after a stressor (stress reduction), it led to a significant increase in salivary cortisol concentrations when presented before the stressor (energy mobilization). MDPI 2020-11-03 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7663451/ /pubmed/33153077 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218093 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Project Report Ai, Ting Gillath, Omri Karantzas, Gery C. The Dual Function Model of Attachment Security Priming: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Evidence |
title | The Dual Function Model of Attachment Security Priming: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Evidence |
title_full | The Dual Function Model of Attachment Security Priming: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Evidence |
title_fullStr | The Dual Function Model of Attachment Security Priming: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Evidence |
title_full_unstemmed | The Dual Function Model of Attachment Security Priming: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Evidence |
title_short | The Dual Function Model of Attachment Security Priming: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Evidence |
title_sort | dual function model of attachment security priming: theoretical framework and empirical evidence |
topic | Project Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7663451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33153077 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218093 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aiting thedualfunctionmodelofattachmentsecurityprimingtheoreticalframeworkandempiricalevidence AT gillathomri thedualfunctionmodelofattachmentsecurityprimingtheoreticalframeworkandempiricalevidence AT karantzasgeryc thedualfunctionmodelofattachmentsecurityprimingtheoreticalframeworkandempiricalevidence AT aiting dualfunctionmodelofattachmentsecurityprimingtheoreticalframeworkandempiricalevidence AT gillathomri dualfunctionmodelofattachmentsecurityprimingtheoreticalframeworkandempiricalevidence AT karantzasgeryc dualfunctionmodelofattachmentsecurityprimingtheoreticalframeworkandempiricalevidence |