Cargando…

The Dual Function Model of Attachment Security Priming: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Evidence

According to attachment theory, security providing attachment figures fulfill two main functions: (1) safe haven—providing safety and comfort and reducing stress—helping people regain a sense of security; and (2) secure base—providing resources and a base from which people can spring into action. Ac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ai, Ting, Gillath, Omri, Karantzas, Gery C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7663451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33153077
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218093
_version_ 1783609630133321728
author Ai, Ting
Gillath, Omri
Karantzas, Gery C.
author_facet Ai, Ting
Gillath, Omri
Karantzas, Gery C.
author_sort Ai, Ting
collection PubMed
description According to attachment theory, security providing attachment figures fulfill two main functions: (1) safe haven—providing safety and comfort and reducing stress—helping people regain a sense of security; and (2) secure base—providing resources and a base from which people can spring into action. According to the Dual Function of Security Priming Model, security priming can result in one of two outcomes paralleling these two functions. Which outcome is likely to present itself depends on the level of stress imposed by the context. Here we describe the Dual Function Model of Security Priming (DFSP) Model and provide evidence from a study examining the effects of attachment security priming on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal activity. In the study, participants were exposed to security-related cues under high or low/no-stress conditions, while their salivary cortisol concentrations were measured. Cortisol is a suitable index as it is released not only in response to stress, but also more generally when energy needs to be mobilized. We found that while security priming led to significant decreases in salivary cortisol concentrations when presented after a stressor (stress reduction), it led to a significant increase in salivary cortisol concentrations when presented before the stressor (energy mobilization).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7663451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76634512020-11-14 The Dual Function Model of Attachment Security Priming: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Evidence Ai, Ting Gillath, Omri Karantzas, Gery C. Int J Environ Res Public Health Project Report According to attachment theory, security providing attachment figures fulfill two main functions: (1) safe haven—providing safety and comfort and reducing stress—helping people regain a sense of security; and (2) secure base—providing resources and a base from which people can spring into action. According to the Dual Function of Security Priming Model, security priming can result in one of two outcomes paralleling these two functions. Which outcome is likely to present itself depends on the level of stress imposed by the context. Here we describe the Dual Function Model of Security Priming (DFSP) Model and provide evidence from a study examining the effects of attachment security priming on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal activity. In the study, participants were exposed to security-related cues under high or low/no-stress conditions, while their salivary cortisol concentrations were measured. Cortisol is a suitable index as it is released not only in response to stress, but also more generally when energy needs to be mobilized. We found that while security priming led to significant decreases in salivary cortisol concentrations when presented after a stressor (stress reduction), it led to a significant increase in salivary cortisol concentrations when presented before the stressor (energy mobilization). MDPI 2020-11-03 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7663451/ /pubmed/33153077 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218093 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Project Report
Ai, Ting
Gillath, Omri
Karantzas, Gery C.
The Dual Function Model of Attachment Security Priming: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Evidence
title The Dual Function Model of Attachment Security Priming: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Evidence
title_full The Dual Function Model of Attachment Security Priming: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Evidence
title_fullStr The Dual Function Model of Attachment Security Priming: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Evidence
title_full_unstemmed The Dual Function Model of Attachment Security Priming: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Evidence
title_short The Dual Function Model of Attachment Security Priming: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Evidence
title_sort dual function model of attachment security priming: theoretical framework and empirical evidence
topic Project Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7663451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33153077
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218093
work_keys_str_mv AT aiting thedualfunctionmodelofattachmentsecurityprimingtheoreticalframeworkandempiricalevidence
AT gillathomri thedualfunctionmodelofattachmentsecurityprimingtheoreticalframeworkandempiricalevidence
AT karantzasgeryc thedualfunctionmodelofattachmentsecurityprimingtheoreticalframeworkandempiricalevidence
AT aiting dualfunctionmodelofattachmentsecurityprimingtheoreticalframeworkandempiricalevidence
AT gillathomri dualfunctionmodelofattachmentsecurityprimingtheoreticalframeworkandempiricalevidence
AT karantzasgeryc dualfunctionmodelofattachmentsecurityprimingtheoreticalframeworkandempiricalevidence