Cargando…

Performance of Optical Coupling Materials in Scintillation Detectors Post Temperature Exposure

In this paper, the room-temperature performance of different optical coupling materials post temperature exposure was tested. The tested couplers included OC431A-LVP, OG0010 optical grease, BLUESIL V-788, and SAINT-GOBAIN BC-630. This was done by subjecting the whole detector with newly applied opti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Romanchek, Gregory, Wang, Yuli, Marupudi, Harsha, Abbaszadeh, Shiva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7663502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33120896
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20216092
_version_ 1783609641550217216
author Romanchek, Gregory
Wang, Yuli
Marupudi, Harsha
Abbaszadeh, Shiva
author_facet Romanchek, Gregory
Wang, Yuli
Marupudi, Harsha
Abbaszadeh, Shiva
author_sort Romanchek, Gregory
collection PubMed
description In this paper, the room-temperature performance of different optical coupling materials post temperature exposure was tested. The tested couplers included OC431A-LVP, OG0010 optical grease, BLUESIL V-788, and SAINT-GOBAIN BC-630. This was done by subjecting the whole detector with newly applied optical coupling materials to a 2-h temperature exposure—ranging from −20 to 50 °C and then by letting it return to room temperature before collecting a spectrum from a Cs-137 source. The energy resolution at 662 keV was computed as the metric for evaluating the performance. Three trials were run at each coupler–temperature combination. Our results reveal that the performance of all coupling agents do indeed change with temperature after the 2-h exposure. Over all the tested temperature trials, the energy resolution ranged from 11.4 to 14.3% for OC431A-LVP; 10.2 to 14.6% for OG0010; 10 to 13.4% for BLUESIL V-788; and 9.8 to 13.3% for SAINT-GOBAIN BC-630. OC431A-LVP had the lowest variance over the full range, while BC-630 was the most constant for temperatures above 20 °C. Ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectra experiments were also performed on isolated optical coupling materials to measure the light absorption coefficient. The results show that the temperature-induced variance in light absorption coefficient of each optical coupling materials is one of the reasons for the variance in energy resolution performance. Our findings suggest the need for further investigation into this effect and the recommendation that optical coupling materials need to be selected for the task at hand with greater scrutiny.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7663502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76635022020-11-14 Performance of Optical Coupling Materials in Scintillation Detectors Post Temperature Exposure Romanchek, Gregory Wang, Yuli Marupudi, Harsha Abbaszadeh, Shiva Sensors (Basel) Letter In this paper, the room-temperature performance of different optical coupling materials post temperature exposure was tested. The tested couplers included OC431A-LVP, OG0010 optical grease, BLUESIL V-788, and SAINT-GOBAIN BC-630. This was done by subjecting the whole detector with newly applied optical coupling materials to a 2-h temperature exposure—ranging from −20 to 50 °C and then by letting it return to room temperature before collecting a spectrum from a Cs-137 source. The energy resolution at 662 keV was computed as the metric for evaluating the performance. Three trials were run at each coupler–temperature combination. Our results reveal that the performance of all coupling agents do indeed change with temperature after the 2-h exposure. Over all the tested temperature trials, the energy resolution ranged from 11.4 to 14.3% for OC431A-LVP; 10.2 to 14.6% for OG0010; 10 to 13.4% for BLUESIL V-788; and 9.8 to 13.3% for SAINT-GOBAIN BC-630. OC431A-LVP had the lowest variance over the full range, while BC-630 was the most constant for temperatures above 20 °C. Ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectra experiments were also performed on isolated optical coupling materials to measure the light absorption coefficient. The results show that the temperature-induced variance in light absorption coefficient of each optical coupling materials is one of the reasons for the variance in energy resolution performance. Our findings suggest the need for further investigation into this effect and the recommendation that optical coupling materials need to be selected for the task at hand with greater scrutiny. MDPI 2020-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7663502/ /pubmed/33120896 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20216092 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Letter
Romanchek, Gregory
Wang, Yuli
Marupudi, Harsha
Abbaszadeh, Shiva
Performance of Optical Coupling Materials in Scintillation Detectors Post Temperature Exposure
title Performance of Optical Coupling Materials in Scintillation Detectors Post Temperature Exposure
title_full Performance of Optical Coupling Materials in Scintillation Detectors Post Temperature Exposure
title_fullStr Performance of Optical Coupling Materials in Scintillation Detectors Post Temperature Exposure
title_full_unstemmed Performance of Optical Coupling Materials in Scintillation Detectors Post Temperature Exposure
title_short Performance of Optical Coupling Materials in Scintillation Detectors Post Temperature Exposure
title_sort performance of optical coupling materials in scintillation detectors post temperature exposure
topic Letter
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7663502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33120896
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20216092
work_keys_str_mv AT romanchekgregory performanceofopticalcouplingmaterialsinscintillationdetectorsposttemperatureexposure
AT wangyuli performanceofopticalcouplingmaterialsinscintillationdetectorsposttemperatureexposure
AT marupudiharsha performanceofopticalcouplingmaterialsinscintillationdetectorsposttemperatureexposure
AT abbaszadehshiva performanceofopticalcouplingmaterialsinscintillationdetectorsposttemperatureexposure