Cargando…

CdTe Based Energy Resolving, X-ray Photon Counting Detector Performance Assessment: The Effects of Charge Sharing Correction Algorithm Choice

Most modern energy resolving, photon counting detectors employ small (sub 1 mm) pixels for high spatial resolution and low per pixel count rate requirements. These small pixels can suffer from a range of charge sharing effects (CSEs) that degrade both spectral analysis and imaging metrics. A range o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pickford Scienti, Oliver L. P., Bamber, Jeffrey C., Darambara, Dimitra G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7663711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33120903
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20216093
_version_ 1783609690811269120
author Pickford Scienti, Oliver L. P.
Bamber, Jeffrey C.
Darambara, Dimitra G.
author_facet Pickford Scienti, Oliver L. P.
Bamber, Jeffrey C.
Darambara, Dimitra G.
author_sort Pickford Scienti, Oliver L. P.
collection PubMed
description Most modern energy resolving, photon counting detectors employ small (sub 1 mm) pixels for high spatial resolution and low per pixel count rate requirements. These small pixels can suffer from a range of charge sharing effects (CSEs) that degrade both spectral analysis and imaging metrics. A range of charge sharing correction algorithms (CSCAs) have been proposed and validated by different groups to reduce CSEs, however their performance is often compared solely to the same system when no such corrections are made. In this paper, a combination of Monte Carlo and finite element methods are used to compare six different CSCAs with the case where no CSCA is employed, with respect to four different metrics: absolute detection efficiency, photopeak detection efficiency, relative coincidence counts, and binned spectral efficiency. The performance of the various CSCAs is explored when running on systems with pixel pitches ranging from 100 µm to 600µm, in 50 µm increments, and fluxes from 10(6) to 10(8) photons mm(−2) s(−1) are considered. Novel mechanistic explanations for the difference in performance of the various CSCAs are proposed and supported. This work represents a subset of a larger project in which pixel pitch, thickness, flux, and CSCA are all varied systematically.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7663711
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76637112020-11-14 CdTe Based Energy Resolving, X-ray Photon Counting Detector Performance Assessment: The Effects of Charge Sharing Correction Algorithm Choice Pickford Scienti, Oliver L. P. Bamber, Jeffrey C. Darambara, Dimitra G. Sensors (Basel) Article Most modern energy resolving, photon counting detectors employ small (sub 1 mm) pixels for high spatial resolution and low per pixel count rate requirements. These small pixels can suffer from a range of charge sharing effects (CSEs) that degrade both spectral analysis and imaging metrics. A range of charge sharing correction algorithms (CSCAs) have been proposed and validated by different groups to reduce CSEs, however their performance is often compared solely to the same system when no such corrections are made. In this paper, a combination of Monte Carlo and finite element methods are used to compare six different CSCAs with the case where no CSCA is employed, with respect to four different metrics: absolute detection efficiency, photopeak detection efficiency, relative coincidence counts, and binned spectral efficiency. The performance of the various CSCAs is explored when running on systems with pixel pitches ranging from 100 µm to 600µm, in 50 µm increments, and fluxes from 10(6) to 10(8) photons mm(−2) s(−1) are considered. Novel mechanistic explanations for the difference in performance of the various CSCAs are proposed and supported. This work represents a subset of a larger project in which pixel pitch, thickness, flux, and CSCA are all varied systematically. MDPI 2020-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7663711/ /pubmed/33120903 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20216093 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pickford Scienti, Oliver L. P.
Bamber, Jeffrey C.
Darambara, Dimitra G.
CdTe Based Energy Resolving, X-ray Photon Counting Detector Performance Assessment: The Effects of Charge Sharing Correction Algorithm Choice
title CdTe Based Energy Resolving, X-ray Photon Counting Detector Performance Assessment: The Effects of Charge Sharing Correction Algorithm Choice
title_full CdTe Based Energy Resolving, X-ray Photon Counting Detector Performance Assessment: The Effects of Charge Sharing Correction Algorithm Choice
title_fullStr CdTe Based Energy Resolving, X-ray Photon Counting Detector Performance Assessment: The Effects of Charge Sharing Correction Algorithm Choice
title_full_unstemmed CdTe Based Energy Resolving, X-ray Photon Counting Detector Performance Assessment: The Effects of Charge Sharing Correction Algorithm Choice
title_short CdTe Based Energy Resolving, X-ray Photon Counting Detector Performance Assessment: The Effects of Charge Sharing Correction Algorithm Choice
title_sort cdte based energy resolving, x-ray photon counting detector performance assessment: the effects of charge sharing correction algorithm choice
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7663711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33120903
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20216093
work_keys_str_mv AT pickfordscientioliverlp cdtebasedenergyresolvingxrayphotoncountingdetectorperformanceassessmenttheeffectsofchargesharingcorrectionalgorithmchoice
AT bamberjeffreyc cdtebasedenergyresolvingxrayphotoncountingdetectorperformanceassessmenttheeffectsofchargesharingcorrectionalgorithmchoice
AT darambaradimitrag cdtebasedenergyresolvingxrayphotoncountingdetectorperformanceassessmenttheeffectsofchargesharingcorrectionalgorithmchoice