Cargando…
CdTe Based Energy Resolving, X-ray Photon Counting Detector Performance Assessment: The Effects of Charge Sharing Correction Algorithm Choice
Most modern energy resolving, photon counting detectors employ small (sub 1 mm) pixels for high spatial resolution and low per pixel count rate requirements. These small pixels can suffer from a range of charge sharing effects (CSEs) that degrade both spectral analysis and imaging metrics. A range o...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7663711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33120903 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20216093 |
_version_ | 1783609690811269120 |
---|---|
author | Pickford Scienti, Oliver L. P. Bamber, Jeffrey C. Darambara, Dimitra G. |
author_facet | Pickford Scienti, Oliver L. P. Bamber, Jeffrey C. Darambara, Dimitra G. |
author_sort | Pickford Scienti, Oliver L. P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Most modern energy resolving, photon counting detectors employ small (sub 1 mm) pixels for high spatial resolution and low per pixel count rate requirements. These small pixels can suffer from a range of charge sharing effects (CSEs) that degrade both spectral analysis and imaging metrics. A range of charge sharing correction algorithms (CSCAs) have been proposed and validated by different groups to reduce CSEs, however their performance is often compared solely to the same system when no such corrections are made. In this paper, a combination of Monte Carlo and finite element methods are used to compare six different CSCAs with the case where no CSCA is employed, with respect to four different metrics: absolute detection efficiency, photopeak detection efficiency, relative coincidence counts, and binned spectral efficiency. The performance of the various CSCAs is explored when running on systems with pixel pitches ranging from 100 µm to 600µm, in 50 µm increments, and fluxes from 10(6) to 10(8) photons mm(−2) s(−1) are considered. Novel mechanistic explanations for the difference in performance of the various CSCAs are proposed and supported. This work represents a subset of a larger project in which pixel pitch, thickness, flux, and CSCA are all varied systematically. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7663711 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76637112020-11-14 CdTe Based Energy Resolving, X-ray Photon Counting Detector Performance Assessment: The Effects of Charge Sharing Correction Algorithm Choice Pickford Scienti, Oliver L. P. Bamber, Jeffrey C. Darambara, Dimitra G. Sensors (Basel) Article Most modern energy resolving, photon counting detectors employ small (sub 1 mm) pixels for high spatial resolution and low per pixel count rate requirements. These small pixels can suffer from a range of charge sharing effects (CSEs) that degrade both spectral analysis and imaging metrics. A range of charge sharing correction algorithms (CSCAs) have been proposed and validated by different groups to reduce CSEs, however their performance is often compared solely to the same system when no such corrections are made. In this paper, a combination of Monte Carlo and finite element methods are used to compare six different CSCAs with the case where no CSCA is employed, with respect to four different metrics: absolute detection efficiency, photopeak detection efficiency, relative coincidence counts, and binned spectral efficiency. The performance of the various CSCAs is explored when running on systems with pixel pitches ranging from 100 µm to 600µm, in 50 µm increments, and fluxes from 10(6) to 10(8) photons mm(−2) s(−1) are considered. Novel mechanistic explanations for the difference in performance of the various CSCAs are proposed and supported. This work represents a subset of a larger project in which pixel pitch, thickness, flux, and CSCA are all varied systematically. MDPI 2020-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7663711/ /pubmed/33120903 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20216093 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Pickford Scienti, Oliver L. P. Bamber, Jeffrey C. Darambara, Dimitra G. CdTe Based Energy Resolving, X-ray Photon Counting Detector Performance Assessment: The Effects of Charge Sharing Correction Algorithm Choice |
title | CdTe Based Energy Resolving, X-ray Photon Counting Detector Performance Assessment: The Effects of Charge Sharing Correction Algorithm Choice |
title_full | CdTe Based Energy Resolving, X-ray Photon Counting Detector Performance Assessment: The Effects of Charge Sharing Correction Algorithm Choice |
title_fullStr | CdTe Based Energy Resolving, X-ray Photon Counting Detector Performance Assessment: The Effects of Charge Sharing Correction Algorithm Choice |
title_full_unstemmed | CdTe Based Energy Resolving, X-ray Photon Counting Detector Performance Assessment: The Effects of Charge Sharing Correction Algorithm Choice |
title_short | CdTe Based Energy Resolving, X-ray Photon Counting Detector Performance Assessment: The Effects of Charge Sharing Correction Algorithm Choice |
title_sort | cdte based energy resolving, x-ray photon counting detector performance assessment: the effects of charge sharing correction algorithm choice |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7663711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33120903 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20216093 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pickfordscientioliverlp cdtebasedenergyresolvingxrayphotoncountingdetectorperformanceassessmenttheeffectsofchargesharingcorrectionalgorithmchoice AT bamberjeffreyc cdtebasedenergyresolvingxrayphotoncountingdetectorperformanceassessmenttheeffectsofchargesharingcorrectionalgorithmchoice AT darambaradimitrag cdtebasedenergyresolvingxrayphotoncountingdetectorperformanceassessmenttheeffectsofchargesharingcorrectionalgorithmchoice |