Cargando…

Life Cycle Sustainability Performance Assessment Method for Comparison of Civil Engineering Works Design Concepts: Case Study of a Bridge

Standardized and transparent life cycle sustainability performance assessment methods are essential for improving the sustainability of civil engineering works. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the potential of using a life cycle sustainability assessment method in a road bridge case stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ek, Kristine, Mathern, Alexandre, Rempling, Rasmus, Brinkhoff, Petra, Karlsson, Mats, Norin, Malin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7663784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33126613
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217909
_version_ 1783609707628331008
author Ek, Kristine
Mathern, Alexandre
Rempling, Rasmus
Brinkhoff, Petra
Karlsson, Mats
Norin, Malin
author_facet Ek, Kristine
Mathern, Alexandre
Rempling, Rasmus
Brinkhoff, Petra
Karlsson, Mats
Norin, Malin
author_sort Ek, Kristine
collection PubMed
description Standardized and transparent life cycle sustainability performance assessment methods are essential for improving the sustainability of civil engineering works. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the potential of using a life cycle sustainability assessment method in a road bridge case study. The method is in line with requirements of relevant standards, uses life cycle assessment, life cycle costs and incomes, and environmental externalities, and applies normalization and weighting of indicators. The case study involves a short-span bridge in a design-build infrastructure project, which was selected for its generality. Two bridge design concepts are assessed and compared: a concrete slab frame bridge and a soil-steel composite bridge. Data available in the contractor’s tender phase are used. The two primary aims of this study are (1) to analyse the practical application potential of the method in carrying out transparent sustainability assessments of design concepts in the early planning and design stages, and (2) to examine the results obtained in the case study to identify indicators in different life cycle stages and elements of the civil engineering works project with the largest impacts on sustainability. The results show that the method facilitates comparisons of the life cycle sustainability performance of design concepts at the indicator and construction element levels, enabling better-informed and more impartial design decisions to be made.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7663784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76637842020-11-14 Life Cycle Sustainability Performance Assessment Method for Comparison of Civil Engineering Works Design Concepts: Case Study of a Bridge Ek, Kristine Mathern, Alexandre Rempling, Rasmus Brinkhoff, Petra Karlsson, Mats Norin, Malin Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Standardized and transparent life cycle sustainability performance assessment methods are essential for improving the sustainability of civil engineering works. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the potential of using a life cycle sustainability assessment method in a road bridge case study. The method is in line with requirements of relevant standards, uses life cycle assessment, life cycle costs and incomes, and environmental externalities, and applies normalization and weighting of indicators. The case study involves a short-span bridge in a design-build infrastructure project, which was selected for its generality. Two bridge design concepts are assessed and compared: a concrete slab frame bridge and a soil-steel composite bridge. Data available in the contractor’s tender phase are used. The two primary aims of this study are (1) to analyse the practical application potential of the method in carrying out transparent sustainability assessments of design concepts in the early planning and design stages, and (2) to examine the results obtained in the case study to identify indicators in different life cycle stages and elements of the civil engineering works project with the largest impacts on sustainability. The results show that the method facilitates comparisons of the life cycle sustainability performance of design concepts at the indicator and construction element levels, enabling better-informed and more impartial design decisions to be made. MDPI 2020-10-28 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7663784/ /pubmed/33126613 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217909 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ek, Kristine
Mathern, Alexandre
Rempling, Rasmus
Brinkhoff, Petra
Karlsson, Mats
Norin, Malin
Life Cycle Sustainability Performance Assessment Method for Comparison of Civil Engineering Works Design Concepts: Case Study of a Bridge
title Life Cycle Sustainability Performance Assessment Method for Comparison of Civil Engineering Works Design Concepts: Case Study of a Bridge
title_full Life Cycle Sustainability Performance Assessment Method for Comparison of Civil Engineering Works Design Concepts: Case Study of a Bridge
title_fullStr Life Cycle Sustainability Performance Assessment Method for Comparison of Civil Engineering Works Design Concepts: Case Study of a Bridge
title_full_unstemmed Life Cycle Sustainability Performance Assessment Method for Comparison of Civil Engineering Works Design Concepts: Case Study of a Bridge
title_short Life Cycle Sustainability Performance Assessment Method for Comparison of Civil Engineering Works Design Concepts: Case Study of a Bridge
title_sort life cycle sustainability performance assessment method for comparison of civil engineering works design concepts: case study of a bridge
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7663784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33126613
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217909
work_keys_str_mv AT ekkristine lifecyclesustainabilityperformanceassessmentmethodforcomparisonofcivilengineeringworksdesignconceptscasestudyofabridge
AT mathernalexandre lifecyclesustainabilityperformanceassessmentmethodforcomparisonofcivilengineeringworksdesignconceptscasestudyofabridge
AT remplingrasmus lifecyclesustainabilityperformanceassessmentmethodforcomparisonofcivilengineeringworksdesignconceptscasestudyofabridge
AT brinkhoffpetra lifecyclesustainabilityperformanceassessmentmethodforcomparisonofcivilengineeringworksdesignconceptscasestudyofabridge
AT karlssonmats lifecyclesustainabilityperformanceassessmentmethodforcomparisonofcivilengineeringworksdesignconceptscasestudyofabridge
AT norinmalin lifecyclesustainabilityperformanceassessmentmethodforcomparisonofcivilengineeringworksdesignconceptscasestudyofabridge