Cargando…

Nurse-led advance care planning with older people who have end-stage kidney disease: feasibility of a deferred entry randomised controlled trial incorporating an economic evaluation and mixed methods process evaluation (ACReDiT)

BACKGROUND: Advance Care Planning is recommended for people with end-stage kidney disease but evidence is limited. Robust clinical trials are needed to investigate the impact of advance care planning in this population. There is little available data on cost-effectiveness to guide decision makers in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Halloran, Peter, Noble, Helen, Norwood, Kelly, Maxwell, Peter, Murtagh, Fliss, Shields, Joanne, Mullan, Robert, Matthews, Michael, Cardwell, Christopher, Clarke, Mike, Morton, Rachael, Shah, Karan, Forbes, Trisha, Brazil, Kevin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7663906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33187506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-02129-5
_version_ 1783609734910181376
author O’Halloran, Peter
Noble, Helen
Norwood, Kelly
Maxwell, Peter
Murtagh, Fliss
Shields, Joanne
Mullan, Robert
Matthews, Michael
Cardwell, Christopher
Clarke, Mike
Morton, Rachael
Shah, Karan
Forbes, Trisha
Brazil, Kevin
author_facet O’Halloran, Peter
Noble, Helen
Norwood, Kelly
Maxwell, Peter
Murtagh, Fliss
Shields, Joanne
Mullan, Robert
Matthews, Michael
Cardwell, Christopher
Clarke, Mike
Morton, Rachael
Shah, Karan
Forbes, Trisha
Brazil, Kevin
author_sort O’Halloran, Peter
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Advance Care Planning is recommended for people with end-stage kidney disease but evidence is limited. Robust clinical trials are needed to investigate the impact of advance care planning in this population. There is little available data on cost-effectiveness to guide decision makers in allocating resources for advance care planning. Therefore we sought to determine the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial and to test methods for assessing cost-effectiveness. METHODS: A deferred entry, randomised controlled feasibility trial, incorporating economic and process evaluations, with people with end-stage kidney disease, aged 65 years or older, receiving haemodialysis, in two renal haemodialysis units in Northern Ireland, UK. A nurse facilitator helped the patient make an advance care plan identifying: a surrogate decision-maker; what the participant would like to happen in the future; any advance decision to refuse treatment; preferred place of care at end-of-life. RESULTS: Recruitment lasted 189 days; intervention and data collection 443 days. Of the 67 patients invited to participate 30 (45%) declined and 36 were randomised to immediate or deferred advance care plan groups. Twenty-two (61%) made an advance care plan and completed data collection at 12 weeks; 17 (47.2%) were able to identify a surrogate willing to be named in the advance care plan document. The intervention was well-received and encouraged end-of-life conversations, but did not succeed in helping patients to fully clarify their values or consider specific treatment choices. There was no significant difference in health system costs between the immediate and deferred groups. CONCLUSIONS: A trial of advance care planning with participants receiving haemodialysis is feasible and acceptable to patients, but challenging. A full trial would require a pool of potential participants five times larger than the number required to complete data collection at 3 months. Widening eligibility criteria to include younger (under 65 years of age) and less frail patients, together with special efforts to engage and retain surrogates may improve recruitment and retention. Traditional advance care planning outcomes may need to be supplemented with those that are defined by patients, helping them to participate with clinicians in making medical decisions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered December 16, 2015. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02631200.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7663906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76639062020-11-13 Nurse-led advance care planning with older people who have end-stage kidney disease: feasibility of a deferred entry randomised controlled trial incorporating an economic evaluation and mixed methods process evaluation (ACReDiT) O’Halloran, Peter Noble, Helen Norwood, Kelly Maxwell, Peter Murtagh, Fliss Shields, Joanne Mullan, Robert Matthews, Michael Cardwell, Christopher Clarke, Mike Morton, Rachael Shah, Karan Forbes, Trisha Brazil, Kevin BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: Advance Care Planning is recommended for people with end-stage kidney disease but evidence is limited. Robust clinical trials are needed to investigate the impact of advance care planning in this population. There is little available data on cost-effectiveness to guide decision makers in allocating resources for advance care planning. Therefore we sought to determine the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial and to test methods for assessing cost-effectiveness. METHODS: A deferred entry, randomised controlled feasibility trial, incorporating economic and process evaluations, with people with end-stage kidney disease, aged 65 years or older, receiving haemodialysis, in two renal haemodialysis units in Northern Ireland, UK. A nurse facilitator helped the patient make an advance care plan identifying: a surrogate decision-maker; what the participant would like to happen in the future; any advance decision to refuse treatment; preferred place of care at end-of-life. RESULTS: Recruitment lasted 189 days; intervention and data collection 443 days. Of the 67 patients invited to participate 30 (45%) declined and 36 were randomised to immediate or deferred advance care plan groups. Twenty-two (61%) made an advance care plan and completed data collection at 12 weeks; 17 (47.2%) were able to identify a surrogate willing to be named in the advance care plan document. The intervention was well-received and encouraged end-of-life conversations, but did not succeed in helping patients to fully clarify their values or consider specific treatment choices. There was no significant difference in health system costs between the immediate and deferred groups. CONCLUSIONS: A trial of advance care planning with participants receiving haemodialysis is feasible and acceptable to patients, but challenging. A full trial would require a pool of potential participants five times larger than the number required to complete data collection at 3 months. Widening eligibility criteria to include younger (under 65 years of age) and less frail patients, together with special efforts to engage and retain surrogates may improve recruitment and retention. Traditional advance care planning outcomes may need to be supplemented with those that are defined by patients, helping them to participate with clinicians in making medical decisions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered December 16, 2015. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02631200. BioMed Central 2020-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7663906/ /pubmed/33187506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-02129-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
O’Halloran, Peter
Noble, Helen
Norwood, Kelly
Maxwell, Peter
Murtagh, Fliss
Shields, Joanne
Mullan, Robert
Matthews, Michael
Cardwell, Christopher
Clarke, Mike
Morton, Rachael
Shah, Karan
Forbes, Trisha
Brazil, Kevin
Nurse-led advance care planning with older people who have end-stage kidney disease: feasibility of a deferred entry randomised controlled trial incorporating an economic evaluation and mixed methods process evaluation (ACReDiT)
title Nurse-led advance care planning with older people who have end-stage kidney disease: feasibility of a deferred entry randomised controlled trial incorporating an economic evaluation and mixed methods process evaluation (ACReDiT)
title_full Nurse-led advance care planning with older people who have end-stage kidney disease: feasibility of a deferred entry randomised controlled trial incorporating an economic evaluation and mixed methods process evaluation (ACReDiT)
title_fullStr Nurse-led advance care planning with older people who have end-stage kidney disease: feasibility of a deferred entry randomised controlled trial incorporating an economic evaluation and mixed methods process evaluation (ACReDiT)
title_full_unstemmed Nurse-led advance care planning with older people who have end-stage kidney disease: feasibility of a deferred entry randomised controlled trial incorporating an economic evaluation and mixed methods process evaluation (ACReDiT)
title_short Nurse-led advance care planning with older people who have end-stage kidney disease: feasibility of a deferred entry randomised controlled trial incorporating an economic evaluation and mixed methods process evaluation (ACReDiT)
title_sort nurse-led advance care planning with older people who have end-stage kidney disease: feasibility of a deferred entry randomised controlled trial incorporating an economic evaluation and mixed methods process evaluation (acredit)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7663906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33187506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-02129-5
work_keys_str_mv AT ohalloranpeter nurseledadvancecareplanningwitholderpeoplewhohaveendstagekidneydiseasefeasibilityofadeferredentryrandomisedcontrolledtrialincorporatinganeconomicevaluationandmixedmethodsprocessevaluationacredit
AT noblehelen nurseledadvancecareplanningwitholderpeoplewhohaveendstagekidneydiseasefeasibilityofadeferredentryrandomisedcontrolledtrialincorporatinganeconomicevaluationandmixedmethodsprocessevaluationacredit
AT norwoodkelly nurseledadvancecareplanningwitholderpeoplewhohaveendstagekidneydiseasefeasibilityofadeferredentryrandomisedcontrolledtrialincorporatinganeconomicevaluationandmixedmethodsprocessevaluationacredit
AT maxwellpeter nurseledadvancecareplanningwitholderpeoplewhohaveendstagekidneydiseasefeasibilityofadeferredentryrandomisedcontrolledtrialincorporatinganeconomicevaluationandmixedmethodsprocessevaluationacredit
AT murtaghfliss nurseledadvancecareplanningwitholderpeoplewhohaveendstagekidneydiseasefeasibilityofadeferredentryrandomisedcontrolledtrialincorporatinganeconomicevaluationandmixedmethodsprocessevaluationacredit
AT shieldsjoanne nurseledadvancecareplanningwitholderpeoplewhohaveendstagekidneydiseasefeasibilityofadeferredentryrandomisedcontrolledtrialincorporatinganeconomicevaluationandmixedmethodsprocessevaluationacredit
AT mullanrobert nurseledadvancecareplanningwitholderpeoplewhohaveendstagekidneydiseasefeasibilityofadeferredentryrandomisedcontrolledtrialincorporatinganeconomicevaluationandmixedmethodsprocessevaluationacredit
AT matthewsmichael nurseledadvancecareplanningwitholderpeoplewhohaveendstagekidneydiseasefeasibilityofadeferredentryrandomisedcontrolledtrialincorporatinganeconomicevaluationandmixedmethodsprocessevaluationacredit
AT cardwellchristopher nurseledadvancecareplanningwitholderpeoplewhohaveendstagekidneydiseasefeasibilityofadeferredentryrandomisedcontrolledtrialincorporatinganeconomicevaluationandmixedmethodsprocessevaluationacredit
AT clarkemike nurseledadvancecareplanningwitholderpeoplewhohaveendstagekidneydiseasefeasibilityofadeferredentryrandomisedcontrolledtrialincorporatinganeconomicevaluationandmixedmethodsprocessevaluationacredit
AT mortonrachael nurseledadvancecareplanningwitholderpeoplewhohaveendstagekidneydiseasefeasibilityofadeferredentryrandomisedcontrolledtrialincorporatinganeconomicevaluationandmixedmethodsprocessevaluationacredit
AT shahkaran nurseledadvancecareplanningwitholderpeoplewhohaveendstagekidneydiseasefeasibilityofadeferredentryrandomisedcontrolledtrialincorporatinganeconomicevaluationandmixedmethodsprocessevaluationacredit
AT forbestrisha nurseledadvancecareplanningwitholderpeoplewhohaveendstagekidneydiseasefeasibilityofadeferredentryrandomisedcontrolledtrialincorporatinganeconomicevaluationandmixedmethodsprocessevaluationacredit
AT brazilkevin nurseledadvancecareplanningwitholderpeoplewhohaveendstagekidneydiseasefeasibilityofadeferredentryrandomisedcontrolledtrialincorporatinganeconomicevaluationandmixedmethodsprocessevaluationacredit