Cargando…
Nurse-led advance care planning with older people who have end-stage kidney disease: feasibility of a deferred entry randomised controlled trial incorporating an economic evaluation and mixed methods process evaluation (ACReDiT)
BACKGROUND: Advance Care Planning is recommended for people with end-stage kidney disease but evidence is limited. Robust clinical trials are needed to investigate the impact of advance care planning in this population. There is little available data on cost-effectiveness to guide decision makers in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7663906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33187506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-02129-5 |
_version_ | 1783609734910181376 |
---|---|
author | O’Halloran, Peter Noble, Helen Norwood, Kelly Maxwell, Peter Murtagh, Fliss Shields, Joanne Mullan, Robert Matthews, Michael Cardwell, Christopher Clarke, Mike Morton, Rachael Shah, Karan Forbes, Trisha Brazil, Kevin |
author_facet | O’Halloran, Peter Noble, Helen Norwood, Kelly Maxwell, Peter Murtagh, Fliss Shields, Joanne Mullan, Robert Matthews, Michael Cardwell, Christopher Clarke, Mike Morton, Rachael Shah, Karan Forbes, Trisha Brazil, Kevin |
author_sort | O’Halloran, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Advance Care Planning is recommended for people with end-stage kidney disease but evidence is limited. Robust clinical trials are needed to investigate the impact of advance care planning in this population. There is little available data on cost-effectiveness to guide decision makers in allocating resources for advance care planning. Therefore we sought to determine the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial and to test methods for assessing cost-effectiveness. METHODS: A deferred entry, randomised controlled feasibility trial, incorporating economic and process evaluations, with people with end-stage kidney disease, aged 65 years or older, receiving haemodialysis, in two renal haemodialysis units in Northern Ireland, UK. A nurse facilitator helped the patient make an advance care plan identifying: a surrogate decision-maker; what the participant would like to happen in the future; any advance decision to refuse treatment; preferred place of care at end-of-life. RESULTS: Recruitment lasted 189 days; intervention and data collection 443 days. Of the 67 patients invited to participate 30 (45%) declined and 36 were randomised to immediate or deferred advance care plan groups. Twenty-two (61%) made an advance care plan and completed data collection at 12 weeks; 17 (47.2%) were able to identify a surrogate willing to be named in the advance care plan document. The intervention was well-received and encouraged end-of-life conversations, but did not succeed in helping patients to fully clarify their values or consider specific treatment choices. There was no significant difference in health system costs between the immediate and deferred groups. CONCLUSIONS: A trial of advance care planning with participants receiving haemodialysis is feasible and acceptable to patients, but challenging. A full trial would require a pool of potential participants five times larger than the number required to complete data collection at 3 months. Widening eligibility criteria to include younger (under 65 years of age) and less frail patients, together with special efforts to engage and retain surrogates may improve recruitment and retention. Traditional advance care planning outcomes may need to be supplemented with those that are defined by patients, helping them to participate with clinicians in making medical decisions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered December 16, 2015. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02631200. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7663906 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76639062020-11-13 Nurse-led advance care planning with older people who have end-stage kidney disease: feasibility of a deferred entry randomised controlled trial incorporating an economic evaluation and mixed methods process evaluation (ACReDiT) O’Halloran, Peter Noble, Helen Norwood, Kelly Maxwell, Peter Murtagh, Fliss Shields, Joanne Mullan, Robert Matthews, Michael Cardwell, Christopher Clarke, Mike Morton, Rachael Shah, Karan Forbes, Trisha Brazil, Kevin BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: Advance Care Planning is recommended for people with end-stage kidney disease but evidence is limited. Robust clinical trials are needed to investigate the impact of advance care planning in this population. There is little available data on cost-effectiveness to guide decision makers in allocating resources for advance care planning. Therefore we sought to determine the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial and to test methods for assessing cost-effectiveness. METHODS: A deferred entry, randomised controlled feasibility trial, incorporating economic and process evaluations, with people with end-stage kidney disease, aged 65 years or older, receiving haemodialysis, in two renal haemodialysis units in Northern Ireland, UK. A nurse facilitator helped the patient make an advance care plan identifying: a surrogate decision-maker; what the participant would like to happen in the future; any advance decision to refuse treatment; preferred place of care at end-of-life. RESULTS: Recruitment lasted 189 days; intervention and data collection 443 days. Of the 67 patients invited to participate 30 (45%) declined and 36 were randomised to immediate or deferred advance care plan groups. Twenty-two (61%) made an advance care plan and completed data collection at 12 weeks; 17 (47.2%) were able to identify a surrogate willing to be named in the advance care plan document. The intervention was well-received and encouraged end-of-life conversations, but did not succeed in helping patients to fully clarify their values or consider specific treatment choices. There was no significant difference in health system costs between the immediate and deferred groups. CONCLUSIONS: A trial of advance care planning with participants receiving haemodialysis is feasible and acceptable to patients, but challenging. A full trial would require a pool of potential participants five times larger than the number required to complete data collection at 3 months. Widening eligibility criteria to include younger (under 65 years of age) and less frail patients, together with special efforts to engage and retain surrogates may improve recruitment and retention. Traditional advance care planning outcomes may need to be supplemented with those that are defined by patients, helping them to participate with clinicians in making medical decisions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered December 16, 2015. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02631200. BioMed Central 2020-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7663906/ /pubmed/33187506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-02129-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article O’Halloran, Peter Noble, Helen Norwood, Kelly Maxwell, Peter Murtagh, Fliss Shields, Joanne Mullan, Robert Matthews, Michael Cardwell, Christopher Clarke, Mike Morton, Rachael Shah, Karan Forbes, Trisha Brazil, Kevin Nurse-led advance care planning with older people who have end-stage kidney disease: feasibility of a deferred entry randomised controlled trial incorporating an economic evaluation and mixed methods process evaluation (ACReDiT) |
title | Nurse-led advance care planning with older people who have end-stage kidney disease: feasibility of a deferred entry randomised controlled trial incorporating an economic evaluation and mixed methods process evaluation (ACReDiT) |
title_full | Nurse-led advance care planning with older people who have end-stage kidney disease: feasibility of a deferred entry randomised controlled trial incorporating an economic evaluation and mixed methods process evaluation (ACReDiT) |
title_fullStr | Nurse-led advance care planning with older people who have end-stage kidney disease: feasibility of a deferred entry randomised controlled trial incorporating an economic evaluation and mixed methods process evaluation (ACReDiT) |
title_full_unstemmed | Nurse-led advance care planning with older people who have end-stage kidney disease: feasibility of a deferred entry randomised controlled trial incorporating an economic evaluation and mixed methods process evaluation (ACReDiT) |
title_short | Nurse-led advance care planning with older people who have end-stage kidney disease: feasibility of a deferred entry randomised controlled trial incorporating an economic evaluation and mixed methods process evaluation (ACReDiT) |
title_sort | nurse-led advance care planning with older people who have end-stage kidney disease: feasibility of a deferred entry randomised controlled trial incorporating an economic evaluation and mixed methods process evaluation (acredit) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7663906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33187506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-02129-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ohalloranpeter nurseledadvancecareplanningwitholderpeoplewhohaveendstagekidneydiseasefeasibilityofadeferredentryrandomisedcontrolledtrialincorporatinganeconomicevaluationandmixedmethodsprocessevaluationacredit AT noblehelen nurseledadvancecareplanningwitholderpeoplewhohaveendstagekidneydiseasefeasibilityofadeferredentryrandomisedcontrolledtrialincorporatinganeconomicevaluationandmixedmethodsprocessevaluationacredit AT norwoodkelly nurseledadvancecareplanningwitholderpeoplewhohaveendstagekidneydiseasefeasibilityofadeferredentryrandomisedcontrolledtrialincorporatinganeconomicevaluationandmixedmethodsprocessevaluationacredit AT maxwellpeter nurseledadvancecareplanningwitholderpeoplewhohaveendstagekidneydiseasefeasibilityofadeferredentryrandomisedcontrolledtrialincorporatinganeconomicevaluationandmixedmethodsprocessevaluationacredit AT murtaghfliss nurseledadvancecareplanningwitholderpeoplewhohaveendstagekidneydiseasefeasibilityofadeferredentryrandomisedcontrolledtrialincorporatinganeconomicevaluationandmixedmethodsprocessevaluationacredit AT shieldsjoanne nurseledadvancecareplanningwitholderpeoplewhohaveendstagekidneydiseasefeasibilityofadeferredentryrandomisedcontrolledtrialincorporatinganeconomicevaluationandmixedmethodsprocessevaluationacredit AT mullanrobert nurseledadvancecareplanningwitholderpeoplewhohaveendstagekidneydiseasefeasibilityofadeferredentryrandomisedcontrolledtrialincorporatinganeconomicevaluationandmixedmethodsprocessevaluationacredit AT matthewsmichael nurseledadvancecareplanningwitholderpeoplewhohaveendstagekidneydiseasefeasibilityofadeferredentryrandomisedcontrolledtrialincorporatinganeconomicevaluationandmixedmethodsprocessevaluationacredit AT cardwellchristopher nurseledadvancecareplanningwitholderpeoplewhohaveendstagekidneydiseasefeasibilityofadeferredentryrandomisedcontrolledtrialincorporatinganeconomicevaluationandmixedmethodsprocessevaluationacredit AT clarkemike nurseledadvancecareplanningwitholderpeoplewhohaveendstagekidneydiseasefeasibilityofadeferredentryrandomisedcontrolledtrialincorporatinganeconomicevaluationandmixedmethodsprocessevaluationacredit AT mortonrachael nurseledadvancecareplanningwitholderpeoplewhohaveendstagekidneydiseasefeasibilityofadeferredentryrandomisedcontrolledtrialincorporatinganeconomicevaluationandmixedmethodsprocessevaluationacredit AT shahkaran nurseledadvancecareplanningwitholderpeoplewhohaveendstagekidneydiseasefeasibilityofadeferredentryrandomisedcontrolledtrialincorporatinganeconomicevaluationandmixedmethodsprocessevaluationacredit AT forbestrisha nurseledadvancecareplanningwitholderpeoplewhohaveendstagekidneydiseasefeasibilityofadeferredentryrandomisedcontrolledtrialincorporatinganeconomicevaluationandmixedmethodsprocessevaluationacredit AT brazilkevin nurseledadvancecareplanningwitholderpeoplewhohaveendstagekidneydiseasefeasibilityofadeferredentryrandomisedcontrolledtrialincorporatinganeconomicevaluationandmixedmethodsprocessevaluationacredit |