Cargando…

Estimation of lung tumor position from multiple anatomical features on 4D‐CT using multiple regression analysis

To estimate the lung tumor position from multiple anatomical features on four‐dimensional computed tomography (4D‐CT) data sets using single regression analysis (SRA) and multiple regression analysis (MRA) approach and evaluate an impact of the approach on internal target volume (ITV) for stereotact...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ono, Tomohiro, Nakamura, Mitsuhiro, Hirose, Yoshinori, Kitsuda, Kenji, Ono, Yuka, Ishigaki, Takashi, Hiraoka, Masahiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7663969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28661100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12121
_version_ 1783609749634285568
author Ono, Tomohiro
Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
Hirose, Yoshinori
Kitsuda, Kenji
Ono, Yuka
Ishigaki, Takashi
Hiraoka, Masahiro
author_facet Ono, Tomohiro
Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
Hirose, Yoshinori
Kitsuda, Kenji
Ono, Yuka
Ishigaki, Takashi
Hiraoka, Masahiro
author_sort Ono, Tomohiro
collection PubMed
description To estimate the lung tumor position from multiple anatomical features on four‐dimensional computed tomography (4D‐CT) data sets using single regression analysis (SRA) and multiple regression analysis (MRA) approach and evaluate an impact of the approach on internal target volume (ITV) for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of the lung. Eleven consecutive lung cancer patients (12 cases) underwent 4D‐CT scanning. The three‐dimensional (3D) lung tumor motion exceeded 5 mm. The 3D tumor position and anatomical features, including lung volume, diaphragm, abdominal wall, and chest wall positions, were measured on 4D‐CT images. The tumor position was estimated by SRA using each anatomical feature and MRA using all anatomical features. The difference between the actual and estimated tumor positions was defined as the root‐mean‐square error (RMSE). A standard partial regression coefficient for the MRA was evaluated. The 3D lung tumor position showed a high correlation with the lung volume (R = 0.92 ± 0.10). Additionally, ITVs derived from SRA and MRA approaches were compared with ITV derived from contouring gross tumor volumes on all 10 phases of the 4D‐CT (conventional ITV). The RMSE of the SRA was within 3.7 mm in all directions. Also, the RMSE of the MRA was within 1.6 mm in all directions. The standard partial regression coefficient for the lung volume was the largest and had the most influence on the estimated tumor position. Compared with conventional ITV, average percentage decrease of ITV were 31.9% and 38.3% using SRA and MRA approaches, respectively. The estimation accuracy of lung tumor position was improved by the MRA approach, which provided smaller ITV than conventional ITV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7663969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76639692020-11-17 Estimation of lung tumor position from multiple anatomical features on 4D‐CT using multiple regression analysis Ono, Tomohiro Nakamura, Mitsuhiro Hirose, Yoshinori Kitsuda, Kenji Ono, Yuka Ishigaki, Takashi Hiraoka, Masahiro J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics To estimate the lung tumor position from multiple anatomical features on four‐dimensional computed tomography (4D‐CT) data sets using single regression analysis (SRA) and multiple regression analysis (MRA) approach and evaluate an impact of the approach on internal target volume (ITV) for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of the lung. Eleven consecutive lung cancer patients (12 cases) underwent 4D‐CT scanning. The three‐dimensional (3D) lung tumor motion exceeded 5 mm. The 3D tumor position and anatomical features, including lung volume, diaphragm, abdominal wall, and chest wall positions, were measured on 4D‐CT images. The tumor position was estimated by SRA using each anatomical feature and MRA using all anatomical features. The difference between the actual and estimated tumor positions was defined as the root‐mean‐square error (RMSE). A standard partial regression coefficient for the MRA was evaluated. The 3D lung tumor position showed a high correlation with the lung volume (R = 0.92 ± 0.10). Additionally, ITVs derived from SRA and MRA approaches were compared with ITV derived from contouring gross tumor volumes on all 10 phases of the 4D‐CT (conventional ITV). The RMSE of the SRA was within 3.7 mm in all directions. Also, the RMSE of the MRA was within 1.6 mm in all directions. The standard partial regression coefficient for the lung volume was the largest and had the most influence on the estimated tumor position. Compared with conventional ITV, average percentage decrease of ITV were 31.9% and 38.3% using SRA and MRA approaches, respectively. The estimation accuracy of lung tumor position was improved by the MRA approach, which provided smaller ITV than conventional ITV. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7663969/ /pubmed/28661100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12121 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Ono, Tomohiro
Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
Hirose, Yoshinori
Kitsuda, Kenji
Ono, Yuka
Ishigaki, Takashi
Hiraoka, Masahiro
Estimation of lung tumor position from multiple anatomical features on 4D‐CT using multiple regression analysis
title Estimation of lung tumor position from multiple anatomical features on 4D‐CT using multiple regression analysis
title_full Estimation of lung tumor position from multiple anatomical features on 4D‐CT using multiple regression analysis
title_fullStr Estimation of lung tumor position from multiple anatomical features on 4D‐CT using multiple regression analysis
title_full_unstemmed Estimation of lung tumor position from multiple anatomical features on 4D‐CT using multiple regression analysis
title_short Estimation of lung tumor position from multiple anatomical features on 4D‐CT using multiple regression analysis
title_sort estimation of lung tumor position from multiple anatomical features on 4d‐ct using multiple regression analysis
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7663969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28661100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12121
work_keys_str_mv AT onotomohiro estimationoflungtumorpositionfrommultipleanatomicalfeatureson4dctusingmultipleregressionanalysis
AT nakamuramitsuhiro estimationoflungtumorpositionfrommultipleanatomicalfeatureson4dctusingmultipleregressionanalysis
AT hiroseyoshinori estimationoflungtumorpositionfrommultipleanatomicalfeatureson4dctusingmultipleregressionanalysis
AT kitsudakenji estimationoflungtumorpositionfrommultipleanatomicalfeatureson4dctusingmultipleregressionanalysis
AT onoyuka estimationoflungtumorpositionfrommultipleanatomicalfeatureson4dctusingmultipleregressionanalysis
AT ishigakitakashi estimationoflungtumorpositionfrommultipleanatomicalfeatureson4dctusingmultipleregressionanalysis
AT hiraokamasahiro estimationoflungtumorpositionfrommultipleanatomicalfeatureson4dctusingmultipleregressionanalysis