Cargando…

Doing better: eleven ways to improve the integration of sex and gender in health research proposals

BACKGROUND: Integrating a sex and gender lens is increasingly recognized as important in health research studies. Past failures to adequately consider sex in drug development, for example, led to medications that were metabolized differently, proved harmful, or ineffective, for females. Including bo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mason, Robin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7664020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33292798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00102-2
_version_ 1783609760344440832
author Mason, Robin
author_facet Mason, Robin
author_sort Mason, Robin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Integrating a sex and gender lens is increasingly recognized as important in health research studies. Past failures to adequately consider sex in drug development, for example, led to medications that were metabolized differently, proved harmful, or ineffective, for females. Including both males and females in study populations is important but not sufficient; health, access to healthcare, and treatment provided are also influenced by gender, the socially mediated roles, responsibilities, and behaviors of boys, girls, women and men. Despite understanding the relevance of sex and gender to health research, integrating this lens into study designs can still be challenging. Identified here, are nine opportunities to address sex and gender and thereby strengthen research proposals. METHODS: Ontario investigators were invited to submit a draft of their health research proposal to the Sex and Gender Research Support Service (SGRSS) at Women’s College Hospital in Toronto, Ontario. The service works to build capacity on the integration of sex, gender, and other identity factors, in health research. Using the SAGER Guidelines and the METRICS for the Study of Sex and Gender in Human Participants as guides, proposals were reviewed to enhance their sex and gender considerations. Content analysis of the feedback provided these investigators was subsequently completed. RESULTS: Nearly 100 hundred study proposals were reviewed and investigators provided with suggestions on how to enhance their proposal. Analyzing the feedback provided across the reviewed studies revealed commonly overlooked opportunities to elevate consideration of sex and gender. These were organized into nine suggestions to mirror the sections of a research proposal. CONCLUSION: Health researchers are often challenged on how to integrate a sex and gender lens into their work. Reviews completed across a range of health research studies show there are several commonly overlooked opportunities to do better in this regard. Nine ways to improve the integration of a sex and gender lens in health research proposals have been identified.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7664020
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76640202020-11-13 Doing better: eleven ways to improve the integration of sex and gender in health research proposals Mason, Robin Res Integr Peer Rev Commentary BACKGROUND: Integrating a sex and gender lens is increasingly recognized as important in health research studies. Past failures to adequately consider sex in drug development, for example, led to medications that were metabolized differently, proved harmful, or ineffective, for females. Including both males and females in study populations is important but not sufficient; health, access to healthcare, and treatment provided are also influenced by gender, the socially mediated roles, responsibilities, and behaviors of boys, girls, women and men. Despite understanding the relevance of sex and gender to health research, integrating this lens into study designs can still be challenging. Identified here, are nine opportunities to address sex and gender and thereby strengthen research proposals. METHODS: Ontario investigators were invited to submit a draft of their health research proposal to the Sex and Gender Research Support Service (SGRSS) at Women’s College Hospital in Toronto, Ontario. The service works to build capacity on the integration of sex, gender, and other identity factors, in health research. Using the SAGER Guidelines and the METRICS for the Study of Sex and Gender in Human Participants as guides, proposals were reviewed to enhance their sex and gender considerations. Content analysis of the feedback provided these investigators was subsequently completed. RESULTS: Nearly 100 hundred study proposals were reviewed and investigators provided with suggestions on how to enhance their proposal. Analyzing the feedback provided across the reviewed studies revealed commonly overlooked opportunities to elevate consideration of sex and gender. These were organized into nine suggestions to mirror the sections of a research proposal. CONCLUSION: Health researchers are often challenged on how to integrate a sex and gender lens into their work. Reviews completed across a range of health research studies show there are several commonly overlooked opportunities to do better in this regard. Nine ways to improve the integration of a sex and gender lens in health research proposals have been identified. BioMed Central 2020-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7664020/ /pubmed/33292798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00102-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Commentary
Mason, Robin
Doing better: eleven ways to improve the integration of sex and gender in health research proposals
title Doing better: eleven ways to improve the integration of sex and gender in health research proposals
title_full Doing better: eleven ways to improve the integration of sex and gender in health research proposals
title_fullStr Doing better: eleven ways to improve the integration of sex and gender in health research proposals
title_full_unstemmed Doing better: eleven ways to improve the integration of sex and gender in health research proposals
title_short Doing better: eleven ways to improve the integration of sex and gender in health research proposals
title_sort doing better: eleven ways to improve the integration of sex and gender in health research proposals
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7664020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33292798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00102-2
work_keys_str_mv AT masonrobin doingbetterelevenwaystoimprovetheintegrationofsexandgenderinhealthresearchproposals