Cargando…

The effect of anaesthesia on flank incisional pain: infiltration versus intercostal nerve block, a comparative study

The object of this study is to determine which local wound analgesic option is superior, local anaesthetic infiltration or intercostal nerve block, by combined local anaesthetic agents (0.5% bupivacaine + 2% lidocaine) and to detect which option can best alleviate the post-operative pain management...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Kaabneh, Awad, Qamar, Adnan Abo, Al-Hammouri, Firas, Al-Majali, Ashraf, Alasmar, Ali, Al-sayedeh, Nizar, Khori, Firas, Qapaha, Anan, Beidas, Mohammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The African Field Epidemiology Network 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7664139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33224422
http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2020.36.356.24279
_version_ 1783609782240804864
author Al-Kaabneh, Awad
Qamar, Adnan Abo
Al-Hammouri, Firas
Al-Majali, Ashraf
Alasmar, Ali
Al-sayedeh, Nizar
Khori, Firas
Qapaha, Anan
Beidas, Mohammad
author_facet Al-Kaabneh, Awad
Qamar, Adnan Abo
Al-Hammouri, Firas
Al-Majali, Ashraf
Alasmar, Ali
Al-sayedeh, Nizar
Khori, Firas
Qapaha, Anan
Beidas, Mohammad
author_sort Al-Kaabneh, Awad
collection PubMed
description The object of this study is to determine which local wound analgesic option is superior, local anaesthetic infiltration or intercostal nerve block, by combined local anaesthetic agents (0.5% bupivacaine + 2% lidocaine) and to detect which option can best alleviate the post-operative pain management and significantly prolong the time to the first rescue analgesic requirement and the total consumption of opioids in the first post-operative 72 hrs. The medical records of 1458 patients who underwent flank incision procedures by two different surgeons in our institute were retrospectively reviewed. Each surgeon used a different type of local incisional pain management; the first one used infiltration of flank incision routinely, the second surgeon used an intercostal block with all his patients. These elective procedures were carried out in our Urology Centre between June 2007 and June 2019. The duration of follow-up was from the recovery transfer until the end of the third post-operative day. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (729 patients-infiltration of flank incision) and group 2 (729 patients-intercostal nerve block). Patients were aged between 19-78 years. No significant differences were seen regarding the demographic data between both groups, P > 0.05. On the other hand, there were significant differences between group 1 and group 2 according to the mean visual analogue scale score (lower in group 1, P < 0.05), the total mean analgesic requirements during the first post-operative 72 hrs (lower in group 1, P < 0.05) and the time to the first analgesic demand (higher in group 1, P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in post-operative complications between both groups, P > 0.05. The infiltration of flank incision with combined local anaesthetic agents (0.5% Bupivacaine + 2% lidocaine) is more effective in alleviating post-operative pain, decreasing total analgesic consumption during the first post-operative 72 hrs and prolonging the time required for the first rescue opioid.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7664139
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The African Field Epidemiology Network
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76641392020-11-20 The effect of anaesthesia on flank incisional pain: infiltration versus intercostal nerve block, a comparative study Al-Kaabneh, Awad Qamar, Adnan Abo Al-Hammouri, Firas Al-Majali, Ashraf Alasmar, Ali Al-sayedeh, Nizar Khori, Firas Qapaha, Anan Beidas, Mohammad Pan Afr Med J Case Series The object of this study is to determine which local wound analgesic option is superior, local anaesthetic infiltration or intercostal nerve block, by combined local anaesthetic agents (0.5% bupivacaine + 2% lidocaine) and to detect which option can best alleviate the post-operative pain management and significantly prolong the time to the first rescue analgesic requirement and the total consumption of opioids in the first post-operative 72 hrs. The medical records of 1458 patients who underwent flank incision procedures by two different surgeons in our institute were retrospectively reviewed. Each surgeon used a different type of local incisional pain management; the first one used infiltration of flank incision routinely, the second surgeon used an intercostal block with all his patients. These elective procedures were carried out in our Urology Centre between June 2007 and June 2019. The duration of follow-up was from the recovery transfer until the end of the third post-operative day. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (729 patients-infiltration of flank incision) and group 2 (729 patients-intercostal nerve block). Patients were aged between 19-78 years. No significant differences were seen regarding the demographic data between both groups, P > 0.05. On the other hand, there were significant differences between group 1 and group 2 according to the mean visual analogue scale score (lower in group 1, P < 0.05), the total mean analgesic requirements during the first post-operative 72 hrs (lower in group 1, P < 0.05) and the time to the first analgesic demand (higher in group 1, P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in post-operative complications between both groups, P > 0.05. The infiltration of flank incision with combined local anaesthetic agents (0.5% Bupivacaine + 2% lidocaine) is more effective in alleviating post-operative pain, decreasing total analgesic consumption during the first post-operative 72 hrs and prolonging the time required for the first rescue opioid. The African Field Epidemiology Network 2020-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7664139/ /pubmed/33224422 http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2020.36.356.24279 Text en Copyright: Awad Al-Kaabneh et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 The Pan African Medical Journal (ISSN: 1937-8688). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Series
Al-Kaabneh, Awad
Qamar, Adnan Abo
Al-Hammouri, Firas
Al-Majali, Ashraf
Alasmar, Ali
Al-sayedeh, Nizar
Khori, Firas
Qapaha, Anan
Beidas, Mohammad
The effect of anaesthesia on flank incisional pain: infiltration versus intercostal nerve block, a comparative study
title The effect of anaesthesia on flank incisional pain: infiltration versus intercostal nerve block, a comparative study
title_full The effect of anaesthesia on flank incisional pain: infiltration versus intercostal nerve block, a comparative study
title_fullStr The effect of anaesthesia on flank incisional pain: infiltration versus intercostal nerve block, a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed The effect of anaesthesia on flank incisional pain: infiltration versus intercostal nerve block, a comparative study
title_short The effect of anaesthesia on flank incisional pain: infiltration versus intercostal nerve block, a comparative study
title_sort effect of anaesthesia on flank incisional pain: infiltration versus intercostal nerve block, a comparative study
topic Case Series
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7664139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33224422
http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2020.36.356.24279
work_keys_str_mv AT alkaabnehawad theeffectofanaesthesiaonflankincisionalpaininfiltrationversusintercostalnerveblockacomparativestudy
AT qamaradnanabo theeffectofanaesthesiaonflankincisionalpaininfiltrationversusintercostalnerveblockacomparativestudy
AT alhammourifiras theeffectofanaesthesiaonflankincisionalpaininfiltrationversusintercostalnerveblockacomparativestudy
AT almajaliashraf theeffectofanaesthesiaonflankincisionalpaininfiltrationversusintercostalnerveblockacomparativestudy
AT alasmarali theeffectofanaesthesiaonflankincisionalpaininfiltrationversusintercostalnerveblockacomparativestudy
AT alsayedehnizar theeffectofanaesthesiaonflankincisionalpaininfiltrationversusintercostalnerveblockacomparativestudy
AT khorifiras theeffectofanaesthesiaonflankincisionalpaininfiltrationversusintercostalnerveblockacomparativestudy
AT qapahaanan theeffectofanaesthesiaonflankincisionalpaininfiltrationversusintercostalnerveblockacomparativestudy
AT beidasmohammad theeffectofanaesthesiaonflankincisionalpaininfiltrationversusintercostalnerveblockacomparativestudy
AT alkaabnehawad effectofanaesthesiaonflankincisionalpaininfiltrationversusintercostalnerveblockacomparativestudy
AT qamaradnanabo effectofanaesthesiaonflankincisionalpaininfiltrationversusintercostalnerveblockacomparativestudy
AT alhammourifiras effectofanaesthesiaonflankincisionalpaininfiltrationversusintercostalnerveblockacomparativestudy
AT almajaliashraf effectofanaesthesiaonflankincisionalpaininfiltrationversusintercostalnerveblockacomparativestudy
AT alasmarali effectofanaesthesiaonflankincisionalpaininfiltrationversusintercostalnerveblockacomparativestudy
AT alsayedehnizar effectofanaesthesiaonflankincisionalpaininfiltrationversusintercostalnerveblockacomparativestudy
AT khorifiras effectofanaesthesiaonflankincisionalpaininfiltrationversusintercostalnerveblockacomparativestudy
AT qapahaanan effectofanaesthesiaonflankincisionalpaininfiltrationversusintercostalnerveblockacomparativestudy
AT beidasmohammad effectofanaesthesiaonflankincisionalpaininfiltrationversusintercostalnerveblockacomparativestudy