Cargando…

Interventions of a clinical pharmacist in a medical intensive care unit – A retrospective analysis

Several studies demonstrated a significant decrease in prescription errors, adverse drug events, treatment costs and improved patient outcomes, when a clinical pharmacist (CP) was a full member of a multidisciplinary team in the intensive care unit (ICU). Our aim was to evaluate the activities of a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cvikl, Maja, Sinkovič, Andreja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Association of Basic Medical Sciences of Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7664781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32070269
http://dx.doi.org/10.17305/bjbms.2020.4612
_version_ 1783609895216480256
author Cvikl, Maja
Sinkovič, Andreja
author_facet Cvikl, Maja
Sinkovič, Andreja
author_sort Cvikl, Maja
collection PubMed
description Several studies demonstrated a significant decrease in prescription errors, adverse drug events, treatment costs and improved patient outcomes, when a clinical pharmacist (CP) was a full member of a multidisciplinary team in the intensive care unit (ICU). Our aim was to evaluate the activities of a CP, included in a 12-bed medical ICU team of a university hospital in the course of several months. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all the CP’s interventions from March 2017 to November 2017, carried out and documented after reviewing and discussing patients’ medical data with the treating ICU physicians. We identified four main categories of CP’s interventions: pharmacotherapy adjustments to kidney function (PAKF category), drug-drug interactions (DDIs category), therapeutic monitoring of drugs with narrow therapeutic index (TDM category), and drug administration by the nasogastric tube (NGT category). During the study period, 533 patients were admitted to the medical ICU. The CP reviewed the medical data of 321 patients and suggested 307 interventions in 95 patients. There were 147 interventions of the PAKF category, 57 interventions of the TDM category, 30 interventions of the NGT category, and 22 interventions of the DDIs category. Fifty-one interventions were unspecified. The majority of all interventions (203/307) were related to antimicrobial drugs. ICU physicians completely accepted 80.2% of the CP’s suggestions. We observed that regular participation of the CP in the medical ICU team contributed to more individualized and improved pharmacological treatment of patients. Therefore, ICU teams should be encouraged to include CPs as regular team members.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7664781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Association of Basic Medical Sciences of Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76647812020-11-15 Interventions of a clinical pharmacist in a medical intensive care unit – A retrospective analysis Cvikl, Maja Sinkovič, Andreja Bosn J Basic Med Sci Research Article Several studies demonstrated a significant decrease in prescription errors, adverse drug events, treatment costs and improved patient outcomes, when a clinical pharmacist (CP) was a full member of a multidisciplinary team in the intensive care unit (ICU). Our aim was to evaluate the activities of a CP, included in a 12-bed medical ICU team of a university hospital in the course of several months. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all the CP’s interventions from March 2017 to November 2017, carried out and documented after reviewing and discussing patients’ medical data with the treating ICU physicians. We identified four main categories of CP’s interventions: pharmacotherapy adjustments to kidney function (PAKF category), drug-drug interactions (DDIs category), therapeutic monitoring of drugs with narrow therapeutic index (TDM category), and drug administration by the nasogastric tube (NGT category). During the study period, 533 patients were admitted to the medical ICU. The CP reviewed the medical data of 321 patients and suggested 307 interventions in 95 patients. There were 147 interventions of the PAKF category, 57 interventions of the TDM category, 30 interventions of the NGT category, and 22 interventions of the DDIs category. Fifty-one interventions were unspecified. The majority of all interventions (203/307) were related to antimicrobial drugs. ICU physicians completely accepted 80.2% of the CP’s suggestions. We observed that regular participation of the CP in the medical ICU team contributed to more individualized and improved pharmacological treatment of patients. Therefore, ICU teams should be encouraged to include CPs as regular team members. Association of Basic Medical Sciences of Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7664781/ /pubmed/32070269 http://dx.doi.org/10.17305/bjbms.2020.4612 Text en Copyright: © The Author(s) (2020) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Research Article
Cvikl, Maja
Sinkovič, Andreja
Interventions of a clinical pharmacist in a medical intensive care unit – A retrospective analysis
title Interventions of a clinical pharmacist in a medical intensive care unit – A retrospective analysis
title_full Interventions of a clinical pharmacist in a medical intensive care unit – A retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Interventions of a clinical pharmacist in a medical intensive care unit – A retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Interventions of a clinical pharmacist in a medical intensive care unit – A retrospective analysis
title_short Interventions of a clinical pharmacist in a medical intensive care unit – A retrospective analysis
title_sort interventions of a clinical pharmacist in a medical intensive care unit – a retrospective analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7664781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32070269
http://dx.doi.org/10.17305/bjbms.2020.4612
work_keys_str_mv AT cviklmaja interventionsofaclinicalpharmacistinamedicalintensivecareunitaretrospectiveanalysis
AT sinkovicandreja interventionsofaclinicalpharmacistinamedicalintensivecareunitaretrospectiveanalysis