Cargando…

Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Ligustrazine in the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the efficacy and safety of Ligustrazine in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). METHODS: The electronic literature databases (PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang database, and VIP) were retrieved through a computer to find out the randomized controlled...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Xiaozheng, Li, Wen, Luo, Zhenliang, Chen, Yunzhi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7665923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33204284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2416132
_version_ 1783610053162434560
author Wu, Xiaozheng
Li, Wen
Luo, Zhenliang
Chen, Yunzhi
author_facet Wu, Xiaozheng
Li, Wen
Luo, Zhenliang
Chen, Yunzhi
author_sort Wu, Xiaozheng
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the efficacy and safety of Ligustrazine in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). METHODS: The electronic literature databases (PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang database, and VIP) were retrieved through a computer to find out the randomized controlled trials (RCT) of Ligustrazine in the treatment of IPF according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria screening test. Cochrane's bias risk table was also used to evaluate the quality of the study and to extract effective data. RevMan 5.3 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 7 RCTs (a total of 366 patients, including 196 in experimental and 170 in control group). Compared with the control group, Ligustrazine could improve the clinical symptoms ([OR] = 2.20, 95% CI [1.40, 3.46], P=0.0006), lung function (VC % [MD] = 3.92, 95% CI [0.68, 7.17], P=0.02), (TLC% [MD] = 4.94, 95% CI [0.37, 9.52], P=0.03), the pulmonary diffusion function (DLCO % [MD] = 9.12, 95% CI [5.70, 12.55], P < 0.00001), and arterial blood gas analysis (PaO(2) [MD] = 7.11, 95% CI [1.96, 12.25], P=0.007) (PaCO(2) [MD] = −2.42, 95% CI [−4.36, −0.49], P=0.01) of IPF patients, respectively. However, FEV(1)/FVC % ([MD] = 9.37, 95% CI [−1.23, 19.97], P=0.08) and adverse reactions ([MD] = 0.35, 95% CI [0.02, 5.36], P=0.45) were not significantly improved. CONCLUSION: Ligustrazine has certain clinical efficacy in the treatment of IPF, but the safety of applying it and the adverse reactions need to be further analyzed and determined. It can be considered as a new alternative and complementary medicine to be promoted and recommended for use in medical units in various countries in the world and it solved the difficult problem of conventional drug treatment of IPF; therefore, more research strength can be put in the treatment of the pathological mechanism of IPF for further exploration. The study was registered under registration number CRD42020193626.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7665923
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76659232020-11-16 Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Ligustrazine in the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Wu, Xiaozheng Li, Wen Luo, Zhenliang Chen, Yunzhi Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Research Article OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the efficacy and safety of Ligustrazine in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). METHODS: The electronic literature databases (PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang database, and VIP) were retrieved through a computer to find out the randomized controlled trials (RCT) of Ligustrazine in the treatment of IPF according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria screening test. Cochrane's bias risk table was also used to evaluate the quality of the study and to extract effective data. RevMan 5.3 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 7 RCTs (a total of 366 patients, including 196 in experimental and 170 in control group). Compared with the control group, Ligustrazine could improve the clinical symptoms ([OR] = 2.20, 95% CI [1.40, 3.46], P=0.0006), lung function (VC % [MD] = 3.92, 95% CI [0.68, 7.17], P=0.02), (TLC% [MD] = 4.94, 95% CI [0.37, 9.52], P=0.03), the pulmonary diffusion function (DLCO % [MD] = 9.12, 95% CI [5.70, 12.55], P < 0.00001), and arterial blood gas analysis (PaO(2) [MD] = 7.11, 95% CI [1.96, 12.25], P=0.007) (PaCO(2) [MD] = −2.42, 95% CI [−4.36, −0.49], P=0.01) of IPF patients, respectively. However, FEV(1)/FVC % ([MD] = 9.37, 95% CI [−1.23, 19.97], P=0.08) and adverse reactions ([MD] = 0.35, 95% CI [0.02, 5.36], P=0.45) were not significantly improved. CONCLUSION: Ligustrazine has certain clinical efficacy in the treatment of IPF, but the safety of applying it and the adverse reactions need to be further analyzed and determined. It can be considered as a new alternative and complementary medicine to be promoted and recommended for use in medical units in various countries in the world and it solved the difficult problem of conventional drug treatment of IPF; therefore, more research strength can be put in the treatment of the pathological mechanism of IPF for further exploration. The study was registered under registration number CRD42020193626. Hindawi 2020-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7665923/ /pubmed/33204284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2416132 Text en Copyright © 2020 Xiaozheng Wu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wu, Xiaozheng
Li, Wen
Luo, Zhenliang
Chen, Yunzhi
Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Ligustrazine in the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
title Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Ligustrazine in the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
title_full Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Ligustrazine in the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
title_fullStr Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Ligustrazine in the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
title_full_unstemmed Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Ligustrazine in the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
title_short Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Ligustrazine in the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
title_sort meta-analysis of clinical efficacy and safety of ligustrazine in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7665923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33204284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2416132
work_keys_str_mv AT wuxiaozheng metaanalysisofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofligustrazineinthetreatmentofidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosis
AT liwen metaanalysisofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofligustrazineinthetreatmentofidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosis
AT luozhenliang metaanalysisofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofligustrazineinthetreatmentofidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosis
AT chenyunzhi metaanalysisofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofligustrazineinthetreatmentofidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosis