Cargando…

Microvascular reconstruction in head and neck cancer - basis for the development of an enhanced recovery protocol

INTRODUCTION: Microvascular reconstructions after head and neck cancer are among the most complicated procedures in plastic surgery. Postoperative complications are common, which often leads to prolonged hospital stay. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a peri- and postoperative care concept...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Højvig, Jens H., Pedersen, Nicolas J., Charabi, Birgitte W., Wessel, Irene, Jensen, Lisa T., Nyberg, Jan, Mayman-Holler, Nana, Kehlet, Henrik, Bonde, Christian T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7666314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33225037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2020.09.008
_version_ 1783610107824701440
author Højvig, Jens H.
Pedersen, Nicolas J.
Charabi, Birgitte W.
Wessel, Irene
Jensen, Lisa T.
Nyberg, Jan
Mayman-Holler, Nana
Kehlet, Henrik
Bonde, Christian T.
author_facet Højvig, Jens H.
Pedersen, Nicolas J.
Charabi, Birgitte W.
Wessel, Irene
Jensen, Lisa T.
Nyberg, Jan
Mayman-Holler, Nana
Kehlet, Henrik
Bonde, Christian T.
author_sort Højvig, Jens H.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Microvascular reconstructions after head and neck cancer are among the most complicated procedures in plastic surgery. Postoperative complications are common, which often leads to prolonged hospital stay. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a peri- and postoperative care concept with the aim of achieving pain- and risk-free surgery. It has been previously established as superior to conventional care for a wide variety of procedures, including microsurgical procedures such as reconstructions of the breast. Several ERAS protocols for microvascular head and neck cancer reconstructions have been proposed, although most of these are based on extrapolated evidence from different surgical specialties. Results from the implementation of ERAS for these procedures are inconsistent. METHODS: The current study investigates our clinical experience of head and neck cancer reconstruction for the period of 2014-2016 with the aim of establishing a list of functional discharge criteria. By combining these with the current published knowledge on the subject, we developed an ERAS protocol. RESULTS: We performed 89 microvascular procedures in the study period, of which 58 were in the oral cavity/sinuses and 31 were laryngopharyngeal. Most cases were squamous cell carcinoma (89%). The average LOS was 20.3 days in both groups. Postoperative complications included infection (37%), 30-days re-operations (19%), and re-admissions (17%). Furthermore, we identified the following discharge criteria: adequate pain relief, ambulation, sufficient nutritional intake, normal infection-related blood parameter results and absence of fever, bowel function, and closure of tracheostomy. CONCLUSION: Based on our retrospective analysis and identified discharge criteria, we present an approach to develop an ERAS protocol for microvascular reconstruction after head and neck cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7666314
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76663142020-11-20 Microvascular reconstruction in head and neck cancer - basis for the development of an enhanced recovery protocol Højvig, Jens H. Pedersen, Nicolas J. Charabi, Birgitte W. Wessel, Irene Jensen, Lisa T. Nyberg, Jan Mayman-Holler, Nana Kehlet, Henrik Bonde, Christian T. JPRAS Open Original Article INTRODUCTION: Microvascular reconstructions after head and neck cancer are among the most complicated procedures in plastic surgery. Postoperative complications are common, which often leads to prolonged hospital stay. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a peri- and postoperative care concept with the aim of achieving pain- and risk-free surgery. It has been previously established as superior to conventional care for a wide variety of procedures, including microsurgical procedures such as reconstructions of the breast. Several ERAS protocols for microvascular head and neck cancer reconstructions have been proposed, although most of these are based on extrapolated evidence from different surgical specialties. Results from the implementation of ERAS for these procedures are inconsistent. METHODS: The current study investigates our clinical experience of head and neck cancer reconstruction for the period of 2014-2016 with the aim of establishing a list of functional discharge criteria. By combining these with the current published knowledge on the subject, we developed an ERAS protocol. RESULTS: We performed 89 microvascular procedures in the study period, of which 58 were in the oral cavity/sinuses and 31 were laryngopharyngeal. Most cases were squamous cell carcinoma (89%). The average LOS was 20.3 days in both groups. Postoperative complications included infection (37%), 30-days re-operations (19%), and re-admissions (17%). Furthermore, we identified the following discharge criteria: adequate pain relief, ambulation, sufficient nutritional intake, normal infection-related blood parameter results and absence of fever, bowel function, and closure of tracheostomy. CONCLUSION: Based on our retrospective analysis and identified discharge criteria, we present an approach to develop an ERAS protocol for microvascular reconstruction after head and neck cancer. Elsevier 2020-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7666314/ /pubmed/33225037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2020.09.008 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Højvig, Jens H.
Pedersen, Nicolas J.
Charabi, Birgitte W.
Wessel, Irene
Jensen, Lisa T.
Nyberg, Jan
Mayman-Holler, Nana
Kehlet, Henrik
Bonde, Christian T.
Microvascular reconstruction in head and neck cancer - basis for the development of an enhanced recovery protocol
title Microvascular reconstruction in head and neck cancer - basis for the development of an enhanced recovery protocol
title_full Microvascular reconstruction in head and neck cancer - basis for the development of an enhanced recovery protocol
title_fullStr Microvascular reconstruction in head and neck cancer - basis for the development of an enhanced recovery protocol
title_full_unstemmed Microvascular reconstruction in head and neck cancer - basis for the development of an enhanced recovery protocol
title_short Microvascular reconstruction in head and neck cancer - basis for the development of an enhanced recovery protocol
title_sort microvascular reconstruction in head and neck cancer - basis for the development of an enhanced recovery protocol
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7666314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33225037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2020.09.008
work_keys_str_mv AT højvigjensh microvascularreconstructioninheadandneckcancerbasisforthedevelopmentofanenhancedrecoveryprotocol
AT pedersennicolasj microvascularreconstructioninheadandneckcancerbasisforthedevelopmentofanenhancedrecoveryprotocol
AT charabibirgittew microvascularreconstructioninheadandneckcancerbasisforthedevelopmentofanenhancedrecoveryprotocol
AT wesselirene microvascularreconstructioninheadandneckcancerbasisforthedevelopmentofanenhancedrecoveryprotocol
AT jensenlisat microvascularreconstructioninheadandneckcancerbasisforthedevelopmentofanenhancedrecoveryprotocol
AT nybergjan microvascularreconstructioninheadandneckcancerbasisforthedevelopmentofanenhancedrecoveryprotocol
AT maymanhollernana microvascularreconstructioninheadandneckcancerbasisforthedevelopmentofanenhancedrecoveryprotocol
AT kehlethenrik microvascularreconstructioninheadandneckcancerbasisforthedevelopmentofanenhancedrecoveryprotocol
AT bondechristiant microvascularreconstructioninheadandneckcancerbasisforthedevelopmentofanenhancedrecoveryprotocol