Cargando…

Machine learning to identify and understand key factors for provider-patient discussions about smoking

We sought to identify key determinants of the likelihood of provider-patient discussions about smoking and to understand the effects of these determinants. We used data on 3666 self-reported current smokers who talked to a health professional within a year of the time the survey was conducted using...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Liangyuan, Li, Lihua, Ji, Jiayi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7666379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33224719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101238
_version_ 1783610121026273280
author Hu, Liangyuan
Li, Lihua
Ji, Jiayi
author_facet Hu, Liangyuan
Li, Lihua
Ji, Jiayi
author_sort Hu, Liangyuan
collection PubMed
description We sought to identify key determinants of the likelihood of provider-patient discussions about smoking and to understand the effects of these determinants. We used data on 3666 self-reported current smokers who talked to a health professional within a year of the time the survey was conducted using the 2017 National Health Interview Survey. We included wide-ranging information on 43 potential covariates across four domains, demographic and socio-economic status, behavior, health status and healthcare utilization. We exploited a principled nonparametric permutation based approach using Bayesian machine learning to identify and rank important determinants of discussions about smoking between health providers and patients. In the order of importance, frequency of doctor office visits, intensity of cigarette use, length of smoking history, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema, marital status were major determinants of disparities in provider-patient discussions about smoking. There was a distinct interaction between intensity of cigarette use and length of smoking history. Our analysis may provide some insights into strategies for promoting discussions on smoking and facilitating smoking cessation. Health care resource usage, smoking intensity and duration and smoking-related conditions were key drivers. The “usual suspects”, age, gender, race and ethnicity were less important, and gender, in particular, had little effect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7666379
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76663792020-11-20 Machine learning to identify and understand key factors for provider-patient discussions about smoking Hu, Liangyuan Li, Lihua Ji, Jiayi Prev Med Rep Regular Article We sought to identify key determinants of the likelihood of provider-patient discussions about smoking and to understand the effects of these determinants. We used data on 3666 self-reported current smokers who talked to a health professional within a year of the time the survey was conducted using the 2017 National Health Interview Survey. We included wide-ranging information on 43 potential covariates across four domains, demographic and socio-economic status, behavior, health status and healthcare utilization. We exploited a principled nonparametric permutation based approach using Bayesian machine learning to identify and rank important determinants of discussions about smoking between health providers and patients. In the order of importance, frequency of doctor office visits, intensity of cigarette use, length of smoking history, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema, marital status were major determinants of disparities in provider-patient discussions about smoking. There was a distinct interaction between intensity of cigarette use and length of smoking history. Our analysis may provide some insights into strategies for promoting discussions on smoking and facilitating smoking cessation. Health care resource usage, smoking intensity and duration and smoking-related conditions were key drivers. The “usual suspects”, age, gender, race and ethnicity were less important, and gender, in particular, had little effect. 2020-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7666379/ /pubmed/33224719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101238 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular Article
Hu, Liangyuan
Li, Lihua
Ji, Jiayi
Machine learning to identify and understand key factors for provider-patient discussions about smoking
title Machine learning to identify and understand key factors for provider-patient discussions about smoking
title_full Machine learning to identify and understand key factors for provider-patient discussions about smoking
title_fullStr Machine learning to identify and understand key factors for provider-patient discussions about smoking
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning to identify and understand key factors for provider-patient discussions about smoking
title_short Machine learning to identify and understand key factors for provider-patient discussions about smoking
title_sort machine learning to identify and understand key factors for provider-patient discussions about smoking
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7666379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33224719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101238
work_keys_str_mv AT huliangyuan machinelearningtoidentifyandunderstandkeyfactorsforproviderpatientdiscussionsaboutsmoking
AT lilihua machinelearningtoidentifyandunderstandkeyfactorsforproviderpatientdiscussionsaboutsmoking
AT jijiayi machinelearningtoidentifyandunderstandkeyfactorsforproviderpatientdiscussionsaboutsmoking