Cargando…

In vivo wear of CAD-CAM composite versus lithium disilicate full coverage first-molar restorations: a pilot study over 2 years

OBJECTIVES: To present a digital approach to measure and compare material wear behavior of antagonistic first molar restorations made of an experimental CAD/CAM composite (COMP) and lithium disilicate ceramic (LS2) in patients with reconstructed vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO) after generalize...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Güth, Jan-Frederik, Erdelt, Kurt, Keul, Christine, Burian, Gintare, Schweiger, Josef, Edelhoff, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7666668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32399736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03294-5
_version_ 1783610172812296192
author Güth, Jan-Frederik
Erdelt, Kurt
Keul, Christine
Burian, Gintare
Schweiger, Josef
Edelhoff, Daniel
author_facet Güth, Jan-Frederik
Erdelt, Kurt
Keul, Christine
Burian, Gintare
Schweiger, Josef
Edelhoff, Daniel
author_sort Güth, Jan-Frederik
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To present a digital approach to measure and compare material wear behavior of antagonistic first molar restorations made of an experimental CAD/CAM composite (COMP) and lithium disilicate ceramic (LS2) in patients with reconstructed vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO) after generalized hard tissue loss. METHODS: A total of 12 patients underwent complete full jaw rehabilitation with full occlusal coverage restorations made either of COMP or LS2. The first molar restorations (n = 48) were chosen for wear examination. At annual recall appointments, polyether impressions were taken, and resulting plaster casts were digitalized using a laboratory scanner. Mean observation period was 371 days for first and 769 days for second year. The resulting 96 datasets were analyzed by superimposition of 3-D datasets using an iterative best-fit method. Based on the superimposition data, the wear rates of the occlusal contact areas (OCAs) were calculated. RESULTS: For antagonistic restorations made of COMP, the average wear rate was 24.8 ± 13.3 μm/month, while for LS2, it was 9.5 ± 4.3 μm/month in first year, with significant differences (p < 0.0001) between the materials. In second year, monthly wear rates decreased significantly for both materials: COMP (16.2 ± 10.7 μm/month) and LS2 (5.5 ± 3.3 μm/month). Statistical comparison between wear time showed significant differences for both materials: COMP p < 0.037 and LS2 p < 0.001. A logarithmic fit (COMP R(2) = 0.081; LS2 R(2) = 0.038) of the data was calculated to estimate the wear progression. SIGNIFICANCE: In patients with reconstructed VDO, restorations made of LS2 show a more stable wear behavior than ones out of experimental CAD/CAM composite. In cases of complete rehabilitation, load bearing CAD/CAM-composite restorations should be critically considered for application due to their occlusal wear behavior. However, when choosing a restorative material, not only the functional occlusal stability should be taken into account but also the prospect of minimally invasive treatment with maximum preservation of natural tooth structures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7666668
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76666682020-11-17 In vivo wear of CAD-CAM composite versus lithium disilicate full coverage first-molar restorations: a pilot study over 2 years Güth, Jan-Frederik Erdelt, Kurt Keul, Christine Burian, Gintare Schweiger, Josef Edelhoff, Daniel Clin Oral Investig Original Article OBJECTIVES: To present a digital approach to measure and compare material wear behavior of antagonistic first molar restorations made of an experimental CAD/CAM composite (COMP) and lithium disilicate ceramic (LS2) in patients with reconstructed vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO) after generalized hard tissue loss. METHODS: A total of 12 patients underwent complete full jaw rehabilitation with full occlusal coverage restorations made either of COMP or LS2. The first molar restorations (n = 48) were chosen for wear examination. At annual recall appointments, polyether impressions were taken, and resulting plaster casts were digitalized using a laboratory scanner. Mean observation period was 371 days for first and 769 days for second year. The resulting 96 datasets were analyzed by superimposition of 3-D datasets using an iterative best-fit method. Based on the superimposition data, the wear rates of the occlusal contact areas (OCAs) were calculated. RESULTS: For antagonistic restorations made of COMP, the average wear rate was 24.8 ± 13.3 μm/month, while for LS2, it was 9.5 ± 4.3 μm/month in first year, with significant differences (p < 0.0001) between the materials. In second year, monthly wear rates decreased significantly for both materials: COMP (16.2 ± 10.7 μm/month) and LS2 (5.5 ± 3.3 μm/month). Statistical comparison between wear time showed significant differences for both materials: COMP p < 0.037 and LS2 p < 0.001. A logarithmic fit (COMP R(2) = 0.081; LS2 R(2) = 0.038) of the data was calculated to estimate the wear progression. SIGNIFICANCE: In patients with reconstructed VDO, restorations made of LS2 show a more stable wear behavior than ones out of experimental CAD/CAM composite. In cases of complete rehabilitation, load bearing CAD/CAM-composite restorations should be critically considered for application due to their occlusal wear behavior. However, when choosing a restorative material, not only the functional occlusal stability should be taken into account but also the prospect of minimally invasive treatment with maximum preservation of natural tooth structures. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-05-12 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7666668/ /pubmed/32399736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03294-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Güth, Jan-Frederik
Erdelt, Kurt
Keul, Christine
Burian, Gintare
Schweiger, Josef
Edelhoff, Daniel
In vivo wear of CAD-CAM composite versus lithium disilicate full coverage first-molar restorations: a pilot study over 2 years
title In vivo wear of CAD-CAM composite versus lithium disilicate full coverage first-molar restorations: a pilot study over 2 years
title_full In vivo wear of CAD-CAM composite versus lithium disilicate full coverage first-molar restorations: a pilot study over 2 years
title_fullStr In vivo wear of CAD-CAM composite versus lithium disilicate full coverage first-molar restorations: a pilot study over 2 years
title_full_unstemmed In vivo wear of CAD-CAM composite versus lithium disilicate full coverage first-molar restorations: a pilot study over 2 years
title_short In vivo wear of CAD-CAM composite versus lithium disilicate full coverage first-molar restorations: a pilot study over 2 years
title_sort in vivo wear of cad-cam composite versus lithium disilicate full coverage first-molar restorations: a pilot study over 2 years
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7666668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32399736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03294-5
work_keys_str_mv AT guthjanfrederik invivowearofcadcamcompositeversuslithiumdisilicatefullcoveragefirstmolarrestorationsapilotstudyover2years
AT erdeltkurt invivowearofcadcamcompositeversuslithiumdisilicatefullcoveragefirstmolarrestorationsapilotstudyover2years
AT keulchristine invivowearofcadcamcompositeversuslithiumdisilicatefullcoveragefirstmolarrestorationsapilotstudyover2years
AT buriangintare invivowearofcadcamcompositeversuslithiumdisilicatefullcoveragefirstmolarrestorationsapilotstudyover2years
AT schweigerjosef invivowearofcadcamcompositeversuslithiumdisilicatefullcoveragefirstmolarrestorationsapilotstudyover2years
AT edelhoffdaniel invivowearofcadcamcompositeversuslithiumdisilicatefullcoveragefirstmolarrestorationsapilotstudyover2years