Cargando…
Magnetic resonance parkinsonism indices and interpeduncular angle in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and progressive supranuclear palsy
PURPOSE: The clinical presentation of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) may overlap with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). The Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index (MRPI), MRPI 2.0, and the interpeduncular angle (IPA) have been investigated to differentiate PSP from healthy contro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7666671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32710162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-020-02500-1 |
_version_ | 1783610173498064896 |
---|---|
author | Ugga, Lorenzo Cuocolo, Renato Cocozza, Sirio Pontillo, Giuseppe Elefante, Andrea Quarantelli, Mario Vicidomini, Caterina De Pandis, Maria Francesca De Michele, Giovanna D’Amico, Alessandra de Divitiis, Oreste Brunetti, Arturo |
author_facet | Ugga, Lorenzo Cuocolo, Renato Cocozza, Sirio Pontillo, Giuseppe Elefante, Andrea Quarantelli, Mario Vicidomini, Caterina De Pandis, Maria Francesca De Michele, Giovanna D’Amico, Alessandra de Divitiis, Oreste Brunetti, Arturo |
author_sort | Ugga, Lorenzo |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The clinical presentation of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) may overlap with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). The Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index (MRPI), MRPI 2.0, and the interpeduncular angle (IPA) have been investigated to differentiate PSP from healthy controls (HC) and other parkinsonisms. We aimed to assess equivalences and differences in MRPI, MRPI 2.0, and IPA in iNPH, PSP, and HC groups. METHODS: We retrospectively recruited 99 subjects (30 iNPH, 32 PSP, 37 HC) from two institutions. MRI exams, acquired on either 1.5 T or 3 T scanners, included 3D T1-weighted images to measure MRPI, MRPI 2.0, and IPA. Inter- and intra-rater reliability was investigated with the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), and the two one-sided t tests (TOST) procedure was used to assess these markers in iNPH, PSP, and HC. RESULTS: For all the three measures, intra-rater and inter-rater ICC were excellent (range = 0.91–0.93). In the comparison of iNPH and PSP with HC, differences for MRPI and MRPI 2.0 (p < 0.01 in all cases) and no equivalence (p = 1.00 in all cases) were found at TOST. iNPH and PSP MRPI showed no difference (p = 0.06) and no equivalence (p = 0.08). MRPI 2.0 was not equivalent (p = 0.06) and not different (p = 0.09) in the same two populations. PSP and HC IPA proved equivalent (p < 0.01) while iNPH IPA was different (p < 0.01) and not equivalent (p = 0.96 and 0.82) from both PSP and HC. CONCLUSION: MRPI and MRPI 2.0 significantly overlap in iNPH and PSP, with risk of misdiagnosis, and for this reason may not be helpful in the differential diagnosis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00234-020-02500-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7666671 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76666712020-11-17 Magnetic resonance parkinsonism indices and interpeduncular angle in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and progressive supranuclear palsy Ugga, Lorenzo Cuocolo, Renato Cocozza, Sirio Pontillo, Giuseppe Elefante, Andrea Quarantelli, Mario Vicidomini, Caterina De Pandis, Maria Francesca De Michele, Giovanna D’Amico, Alessandra de Divitiis, Oreste Brunetti, Arturo Neuroradiology Diagnostic Neuroradiology PURPOSE: The clinical presentation of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) may overlap with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). The Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index (MRPI), MRPI 2.0, and the interpeduncular angle (IPA) have been investigated to differentiate PSP from healthy controls (HC) and other parkinsonisms. We aimed to assess equivalences and differences in MRPI, MRPI 2.0, and IPA in iNPH, PSP, and HC groups. METHODS: We retrospectively recruited 99 subjects (30 iNPH, 32 PSP, 37 HC) from two institutions. MRI exams, acquired on either 1.5 T or 3 T scanners, included 3D T1-weighted images to measure MRPI, MRPI 2.0, and IPA. Inter- and intra-rater reliability was investigated with the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), and the two one-sided t tests (TOST) procedure was used to assess these markers in iNPH, PSP, and HC. RESULTS: For all the three measures, intra-rater and inter-rater ICC were excellent (range = 0.91–0.93). In the comparison of iNPH and PSP with HC, differences for MRPI and MRPI 2.0 (p < 0.01 in all cases) and no equivalence (p = 1.00 in all cases) were found at TOST. iNPH and PSP MRPI showed no difference (p = 0.06) and no equivalence (p = 0.08). MRPI 2.0 was not equivalent (p = 0.06) and not different (p = 0.09) in the same two populations. PSP and HC IPA proved equivalent (p < 0.01) while iNPH IPA was different (p < 0.01) and not equivalent (p = 0.96 and 0.82) from both PSP and HC. CONCLUSION: MRPI and MRPI 2.0 significantly overlap in iNPH and PSP, with risk of misdiagnosis, and for this reason may not be helpful in the differential diagnosis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00234-020-02500-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-07-24 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7666671/ /pubmed/32710162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-020-02500-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Diagnostic Neuroradiology Ugga, Lorenzo Cuocolo, Renato Cocozza, Sirio Pontillo, Giuseppe Elefante, Andrea Quarantelli, Mario Vicidomini, Caterina De Pandis, Maria Francesca De Michele, Giovanna D’Amico, Alessandra de Divitiis, Oreste Brunetti, Arturo Magnetic resonance parkinsonism indices and interpeduncular angle in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and progressive supranuclear palsy |
title | Magnetic resonance parkinsonism indices and interpeduncular angle in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and progressive supranuclear palsy |
title_full | Magnetic resonance parkinsonism indices and interpeduncular angle in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and progressive supranuclear palsy |
title_fullStr | Magnetic resonance parkinsonism indices and interpeduncular angle in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and progressive supranuclear palsy |
title_full_unstemmed | Magnetic resonance parkinsonism indices and interpeduncular angle in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and progressive supranuclear palsy |
title_short | Magnetic resonance parkinsonism indices and interpeduncular angle in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and progressive supranuclear palsy |
title_sort | magnetic resonance parkinsonism indices and interpeduncular angle in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and progressive supranuclear palsy |
topic | Diagnostic Neuroradiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7666671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32710162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-020-02500-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT uggalorenzo magneticresonanceparkinsonismindicesandinterpeduncularangleinidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusandprogressivesupranuclearpalsy AT cuocolorenato magneticresonanceparkinsonismindicesandinterpeduncularangleinidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusandprogressivesupranuclearpalsy AT cocozzasirio magneticresonanceparkinsonismindicesandinterpeduncularangleinidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusandprogressivesupranuclearpalsy AT pontillogiuseppe magneticresonanceparkinsonismindicesandinterpeduncularangleinidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusandprogressivesupranuclearpalsy AT elefanteandrea magneticresonanceparkinsonismindicesandinterpeduncularangleinidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusandprogressivesupranuclearpalsy AT quarantellimario magneticresonanceparkinsonismindicesandinterpeduncularangleinidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusandprogressivesupranuclearpalsy AT vicidominicaterina magneticresonanceparkinsonismindicesandinterpeduncularangleinidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusandprogressivesupranuclearpalsy AT depandismariafrancesca magneticresonanceparkinsonismindicesandinterpeduncularangleinidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusandprogressivesupranuclearpalsy AT demichelegiovanna magneticresonanceparkinsonismindicesandinterpeduncularangleinidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusandprogressivesupranuclearpalsy AT damicoalessandra magneticresonanceparkinsonismindicesandinterpeduncularangleinidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusandprogressivesupranuclearpalsy AT dedivitiisoreste magneticresonanceparkinsonismindicesandinterpeduncularangleinidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusandprogressivesupranuclearpalsy AT brunettiarturo magneticresonanceparkinsonismindicesandinterpeduncularangleinidiopathicnormalpressurehydrocephalusandprogressivesupranuclearpalsy |