Cargando…

Economic analysis of sugammadex versus neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade for laparoscopic surgery in China

BACKGROUND: Neuromuscular blockade and pneumoperitoneum (PP) are important factors to ensure successful laparoscopic surgery. However, residual neuromuscular blockade (rNMB) and PP are associated with many unfavorable complications. The aim of this study is to compare the cost-effectiveness of using...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ren, Maodong, Wang, Ying, Luo, Yan, Fang, Jia, Lu, Yongji, Xuan, Jianwei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7666762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33188600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-020-00292-x
_version_ 1783610194127749120
author Ren, Maodong
Wang, Ying
Luo, Yan
Fang, Jia
Lu, Yongji
Xuan, Jianwei
author_facet Ren, Maodong
Wang, Ying
Luo, Yan
Fang, Jia
Lu, Yongji
Xuan, Jianwei
author_sort Ren, Maodong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neuromuscular blockade and pneumoperitoneum (PP) are important factors to ensure successful laparoscopic surgery. However, residual neuromuscular blockade (rNMB) and PP are associated with many unfavorable complications. The aim of this study is to compare the cost-effectiveness of using sugammadex versus neostigmine in laparoscopic surgery in China. METHODS: A decision tree model was developed with a time horizon based on laparoscopic surgery related hospitalization duration. 2000 patients using sugammadex or neostigmine were simulated within the model. The model outcomes included incidence of rNMB and PP related complications and their treatment costs. Data on clinical efficacy, safety and cost were collected from published literature and interviews of physicians. RESULTS: The model projected that treatment with sugammadex instead of neostigmine would lead to 673 fewer total complications, including rNMB/PP related complications, hospitalization, and other AEs (621 events versus 1294 events, respectively). Use of sugammadex was associated with an incremental medication cost of ¥1,360,410. However, 93.6% of the increased medication cost can be off-set by the reduced costs attributable to treatment of rNMB related complications, PP related complications, hospitalization and other adverse events in sugammadex group. In aggregate, the sugammadex group incurred an incremental cost of ¥86,610 to prevent 673 complications, (¥128.56 per one rNMB/PP related complications prevention). One-way sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the model. CONCLUSIONS: Use of sugammadex in replacement of neostigmine would result in significantly lower rNMB/PP related complications but at a substantially higher medication cost. Upon accounting for the costs associated with treatment of rNMB/PP related complications, 93.6% of medication cost is projected to be offset. In balance, sugammadex appears to offer good value for reversal of neuromuscular blockade for laparoscopic surgery in China.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7666762
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76667622020-11-16 Economic analysis of sugammadex versus neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade for laparoscopic surgery in China Ren, Maodong Wang, Ying Luo, Yan Fang, Jia Lu, Yongji Xuan, Jianwei Health Econ Rev Research BACKGROUND: Neuromuscular blockade and pneumoperitoneum (PP) are important factors to ensure successful laparoscopic surgery. However, residual neuromuscular blockade (rNMB) and PP are associated with many unfavorable complications. The aim of this study is to compare the cost-effectiveness of using sugammadex versus neostigmine in laparoscopic surgery in China. METHODS: A decision tree model was developed with a time horizon based on laparoscopic surgery related hospitalization duration. 2000 patients using sugammadex or neostigmine were simulated within the model. The model outcomes included incidence of rNMB and PP related complications and their treatment costs. Data on clinical efficacy, safety and cost were collected from published literature and interviews of physicians. RESULTS: The model projected that treatment with sugammadex instead of neostigmine would lead to 673 fewer total complications, including rNMB/PP related complications, hospitalization, and other AEs (621 events versus 1294 events, respectively). Use of sugammadex was associated with an incremental medication cost of ¥1,360,410. However, 93.6% of the increased medication cost can be off-set by the reduced costs attributable to treatment of rNMB related complications, PP related complications, hospitalization and other adverse events in sugammadex group. In aggregate, the sugammadex group incurred an incremental cost of ¥86,610 to prevent 673 complications, (¥128.56 per one rNMB/PP related complications prevention). One-way sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the model. CONCLUSIONS: Use of sugammadex in replacement of neostigmine would result in significantly lower rNMB/PP related complications but at a substantially higher medication cost. Upon accounting for the costs associated with treatment of rNMB/PP related complications, 93.6% of medication cost is projected to be offset. In balance, sugammadex appears to offer good value for reversal of neuromuscular blockade for laparoscopic surgery in China. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7666762/ /pubmed/33188600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-020-00292-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ren, Maodong
Wang, Ying
Luo, Yan
Fang, Jia
Lu, Yongji
Xuan, Jianwei
Economic analysis of sugammadex versus neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade for laparoscopic surgery in China
title Economic analysis of sugammadex versus neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade for laparoscopic surgery in China
title_full Economic analysis of sugammadex versus neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade for laparoscopic surgery in China
title_fullStr Economic analysis of sugammadex versus neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade for laparoscopic surgery in China
title_full_unstemmed Economic analysis of sugammadex versus neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade for laparoscopic surgery in China
title_short Economic analysis of sugammadex versus neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade for laparoscopic surgery in China
title_sort economic analysis of sugammadex versus neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade for laparoscopic surgery in china
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7666762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33188600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-020-00292-x
work_keys_str_mv AT renmaodong economicanalysisofsugammadexversusneostigmineforreversalofneuromuscularblockadeforlaparoscopicsurgeryinchina
AT wangying economicanalysisofsugammadexversusneostigmineforreversalofneuromuscularblockadeforlaparoscopicsurgeryinchina
AT luoyan economicanalysisofsugammadexversusneostigmineforreversalofneuromuscularblockadeforlaparoscopicsurgeryinchina
AT fangjia economicanalysisofsugammadexversusneostigmineforreversalofneuromuscularblockadeforlaparoscopicsurgeryinchina
AT luyongji economicanalysisofsugammadexversusneostigmineforreversalofneuromuscularblockadeforlaparoscopicsurgeryinchina
AT xuanjianwei economicanalysisofsugammadexversusneostigmineforreversalofneuromuscularblockadeforlaparoscopicsurgeryinchina