Cargando…

Is acetabular dysplasia and pelvic deformity properly interpreted in patients with congenital femoral deficiency? A 3D analysis of pelvic computed tomography

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to assess the pelvis’s morphology and spatial orientation of the acetabulum, and their relation to the severity of Congenital Femoral Deficiency (CFD) using 3D imaging. Defining these pathologies is crucial for adequate surgical correction. METHODS: The shape and st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Musielak, Bartosz Jan, Shadi, Milud, Kubicka, Anna Maria, Koczewski, Paweł, Rychlik, Michał, Premakumaran, Pirunthi, Jóźwiak, Marek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7666788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33204343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/1863-2548.14.200065
_version_ 1783610199933714432
author Musielak, Bartosz Jan
Shadi, Milud
Kubicka, Anna Maria
Koczewski, Paweł
Rychlik, Michał
Premakumaran, Pirunthi
Jóźwiak, Marek
author_facet Musielak, Bartosz Jan
Shadi, Milud
Kubicka, Anna Maria
Koczewski, Paweł
Rychlik, Michał
Premakumaran, Pirunthi
Jóźwiak, Marek
author_sort Musielak, Bartosz Jan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to assess the pelvis’s morphology and spatial orientation of the acetabulum, and their relation to the severity of Congenital Femoral Deficiency (CFD) using 3D imaging. Defining these pathologies is crucial for adequate surgical correction. METHODS: The shape and structure of the acetabulum and pelvis were evaluated in 14 children with unilateral CFD via 3D computed tomography (CT) scans, and then analysed with geometric morphometrics (Procrustes ANOVA). The association between pelvic directional asymmetry and CFD classifications (Aitken, Paley) was assessed. The affected acetabulum’s orientation was compared to the non-affected side, and the variability of orientation in different CFD types was evaluated (bivariate correlation). RESULTS: The hemipelvis with CFD is characterized by a smaller acetabulum, a laterally curved ischium and a less upright ilium (p < 0.001). Multivariate regressions revealed a greater level of pelvis asymmetry in more severe types of CFD (p < 0.001). The acetabulum orientation assessment showed a significant decrease in mean anteversion (1.3°) and inclination (9.6°) angle, when compared to the non-affected side (26°and 17.1° respectively; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The affected side of the pelvis is considerably smaller and more deformed, and this should be considered during limb lengthening. The acetabulum presents with significant dysplasia due to its severe retroversion and steepness (superoposterior distortion). This should not be interpreted as a simple wall deficit, but as a complete acetabular misalignment (often misinterpreted in 2D imagery). Using transiliac osteotomies (e.g. Dega, Salter) is debatable due to abnormal acetabular orientation (superoposterior malalignment). Therefore, alternative options, e.g. San Diego or triple pelvic osteotomy, should be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7666788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76667882020-11-16 Is acetabular dysplasia and pelvic deformity properly interpreted in patients with congenital femoral deficiency? A 3D analysis of pelvic computed tomography Musielak, Bartosz Jan Shadi, Milud Kubicka, Anna Maria Koczewski, Paweł Rychlik, Michał Premakumaran, Pirunthi Jóźwiak, Marek J Child Orthop Basic Science PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to assess the pelvis’s morphology and spatial orientation of the acetabulum, and their relation to the severity of Congenital Femoral Deficiency (CFD) using 3D imaging. Defining these pathologies is crucial for adequate surgical correction. METHODS: The shape and structure of the acetabulum and pelvis were evaluated in 14 children with unilateral CFD via 3D computed tomography (CT) scans, and then analysed with geometric morphometrics (Procrustes ANOVA). The association between pelvic directional asymmetry and CFD classifications (Aitken, Paley) was assessed. The affected acetabulum’s orientation was compared to the non-affected side, and the variability of orientation in different CFD types was evaluated (bivariate correlation). RESULTS: The hemipelvis with CFD is characterized by a smaller acetabulum, a laterally curved ischium and a less upright ilium (p < 0.001). Multivariate regressions revealed a greater level of pelvis asymmetry in more severe types of CFD (p < 0.001). The acetabulum orientation assessment showed a significant decrease in mean anteversion (1.3°) and inclination (9.6°) angle, when compared to the non-affected side (26°and 17.1° respectively; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The affected side of the pelvis is considerably smaller and more deformed, and this should be considered during limb lengthening. The acetabulum presents with significant dysplasia due to its severe retroversion and steepness (superoposterior distortion). This should not be interpreted as a simple wall deficit, but as a complete acetabular misalignment (often misinterpreted in 2D imagery). Using transiliac osteotomies (e.g. Dega, Salter) is debatable due to abnormal acetabular orientation (superoposterior malalignment). Therefore, alternative options, e.g. San Diego or triple pelvic osteotomy, should be considered. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2020-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7666788/ /pubmed/33204343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/1863-2548.14.200065 Text en Copyright © 2020, The author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed.
spellingShingle Basic Science
Musielak, Bartosz Jan
Shadi, Milud
Kubicka, Anna Maria
Koczewski, Paweł
Rychlik, Michał
Premakumaran, Pirunthi
Jóźwiak, Marek
Is acetabular dysplasia and pelvic deformity properly interpreted in patients with congenital femoral deficiency? A 3D analysis of pelvic computed tomography
title Is acetabular dysplasia and pelvic deformity properly interpreted in patients with congenital femoral deficiency? A 3D analysis of pelvic computed tomography
title_full Is acetabular dysplasia and pelvic deformity properly interpreted in patients with congenital femoral deficiency? A 3D analysis of pelvic computed tomography
title_fullStr Is acetabular dysplasia and pelvic deformity properly interpreted in patients with congenital femoral deficiency? A 3D analysis of pelvic computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed Is acetabular dysplasia and pelvic deformity properly interpreted in patients with congenital femoral deficiency? A 3D analysis of pelvic computed tomography
title_short Is acetabular dysplasia and pelvic deformity properly interpreted in patients with congenital femoral deficiency? A 3D analysis of pelvic computed tomography
title_sort is acetabular dysplasia and pelvic deformity properly interpreted in patients with congenital femoral deficiency? a 3d analysis of pelvic computed tomography
topic Basic Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7666788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33204343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/1863-2548.14.200065
work_keys_str_mv AT musielakbartoszjan isacetabulardysplasiaandpelvicdeformityproperlyinterpretedinpatientswithcongenitalfemoraldeficiencya3danalysisofpelviccomputedtomography
AT shadimilud isacetabulardysplasiaandpelvicdeformityproperlyinterpretedinpatientswithcongenitalfemoraldeficiencya3danalysisofpelviccomputedtomography
AT kubickaannamaria isacetabulardysplasiaandpelvicdeformityproperlyinterpretedinpatientswithcongenitalfemoraldeficiencya3danalysisofpelviccomputedtomography
AT koczewskipaweł isacetabulardysplasiaandpelvicdeformityproperlyinterpretedinpatientswithcongenitalfemoraldeficiencya3danalysisofpelviccomputedtomography
AT rychlikmichał isacetabulardysplasiaandpelvicdeformityproperlyinterpretedinpatientswithcongenitalfemoraldeficiencya3danalysisofpelviccomputedtomography
AT premakumaranpirunthi isacetabulardysplasiaandpelvicdeformityproperlyinterpretedinpatientswithcongenitalfemoraldeficiencya3danalysisofpelviccomputedtomography
AT jozwiakmarek isacetabulardysplasiaandpelvicdeformityproperlyinterpretedinpatientswithcongenitalfemoraldeficiencya3danalysisofpelviccomputedtomography