Cargando…

Is the Gothic Arch a reliable radiographic landmark for migration percentage in children with cerebral palsy?

INTRODUCTION: Reimers migration percentage (MP) is the gold standard for measuring hip displacement in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Hip surveillance registries proposed using the top of the Gothic arch (GA) as a modification in patients with acetabular dysplasia because the classical method (C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wek, Caesar, Chowdhury, Piyal, Smith, Christian, Kokkinakis, Michail
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7666799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33204347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/1863-2548.14.200008
_version_ 1783610202516357120
author Wek, Caesar
Chowdhury, Piyal
Smith, Christian
Kokkinakis, Michail
author_facet Wek, Caesar
Chowdhury, Piyal
Smith, Christian
Kokkinakis, Michail
author_sort Wek, Caesar
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Reimers migration percentage (MP) is the gold standard for measuring hip displacement in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Hip surveillance registries proposed using the top of the Gothic arch (GA) as a modification in patients with acetabular dysplasia because the classical method (CM) described by Reimers may underestimate hip migration. The aim of this study is to assess the inter- and intra-observer reliability of the modified method (MM) versus the CM and identify their effect on the MP. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 50 children with CP, who had a hip radiograph at our institution between 1st April 2014 and 28th February 2018. All hip radiographs were carefully selected to show the presence of a GA. Four observers measured the MP using the CM and MM for each patient. Interclass coefficient was used to estimate inter- and intra-observer reliability. RESULTS: Inter-observer reliability was excellent for the CM with ICC 0.96 (95% CI 0.94 to 0.97) and good for the MM, ICC 0.78 (95% CI 0.51 to 0.89) p < 0.001. Intra-observer reliability was excellent for both methods raging from ICC 0.94 to 0.99 for the CM and ICC 0.89 to 0.95 for the MM. The mean MP was 19% for the CM and 28% for the MM (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The CM is more reliable than the MM to measure hip migration in children with CP. If the CM is used and acetabular dysplasia with a GA are present on the hip radiograph, then a 9% hip migration underestimation should be considered on decisions for both referral and surgical management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7666799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76667992020-11-16 Is the Gothic Arch a reliable radiographic landmark for migration percentage in children with cerebral palsy? Wek, Caesar Chowdhury, Piyal Smith, Christian Kokkinakis, Michail J Child Orthop Original Clinical Article INTRODUCTION: Reimers migration percentage (MP) is the gold standard for measuring hip displacement in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Hip surveillance registries proposed using the top of the Gothic arch (GA) as a modification in patients with acetabular dysplasia because the classical method (CM) described by Reimers may underestimate hip migration. The aim of this study is to assess the inter- and intra-observer reliability of the modified method (MM) versus the CM and identify their effect on the MP. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 50 children with CP, who had a hip radiograph at our institution between 1st April 2014 and 28th February 2018. All hip radiographs were carefully selected to show the presence of a GA. Four observers measured the MP using the CM and MM for each patient. Interclass coefficient was used to estimate inter- and intra-observer reliability. RESULTS: Inter-observer reliability was excellent for the CM with ICC 0.96 (95% CI 0.94 to 0.97) and good for the MM, ICC 0.78 (95% CI 0.51 to 0.89) p < 0.001. Intra-observer reliability was excellent for both methods raging from ICC 0.94 to 0.99 for the CM and ICC 0.89 to 0.95 for the MM. The mean MP was 19% for the CM and 28% for the MM (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The CM is more reliable than the MM to measure hip migration in children with CP. If the CM is used and acetabular dysplasia with a GA are present on the hip radiograph, then a 9% hip migration underestimation should be considered on decisions for both referral and surgical management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2020-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7666799/ /pubmed/33204347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/1863-2548.14.200008 Text en Copyright © 2020, The author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed.
spellingShingle Original Clinical Article
Wek, Caesar
Chowdhury, Piyal
Smith, Christian
Kokkinakis, Michail
Is the Gothic Arch a reliable radiographic landmark for migration percentage in children with cerebral palsy?
title Is the Gothic Arch a reliable radiographic landmark for migration percentage in children with cerebral palsy?
title_full Is the Gothic Arch a reliable radiographic landmark for migration percentage in children with cerebral palsy?
title_fullStr Is the Gothic Arch a reliable radiographic landmark for migration percentage in children with cerebral palsy?
title_full_unstemmed Is the Gothic Arch a reliable radiographic landmark for migration percentage in children with cerebral palsy?
title_short Is the Gothic Arch a reliable radiographic landmark for migration percentage in children with cerebral palsy?
title_sort is the gothic arch a reliable radiographic landmark for migration percentage in children with cerebral palsy?
topic Original Clinical Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7666799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33204347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/1863-2548.14.200008
work_keys_str_mv AT wekcaesar isthegothicarchareliableradiographiclandmarkformigrationpercentageinchildrenwithcerebralpalsy
AT chowdhurypiyal isthegothicarchareliableradiographiclandmarkformigrationpercentageinchildrenwithcerebralpalsy
AT smithchristian isthegothicarchareliableradiographiclandmarkformigrationpercentageinchildrenwithcerebralpalsy
AT kokkinakismichail isthegothicarchareliableradiographiclandmarkformigrationpercentageinchildrenwithcerebralpalsy