Cargando…

Crossed versus conventional pseudophakic monovision for high myopic eyes: a prospective, randomized pilot study

BACKGROUND: Aiming at spectacle independence, conventional pseudophakic monovision has been widely used in myopia patients with bilateral monofocal intraocular lens implantation. However, the crossed monovision, which is to correct the dominant eye for near vision and the non-dominant eye for distan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xun, Yan, Wan, Wenjuan, Jiang, Lu, Hu, Ke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7667742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33198710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01694-5
_version_ 1783610372706533376
author Xun, Yan
Wan, Wenjuan
Jiang, Lu
Hu, Ke
author_facet Xun, Yan
Wan, Wenjuan
Jiang, Lu
Hu, Ke
author_sort Xun, Yan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Aiming at spectacle independence, conventional pseudophakic monovision has been widely used in myopia patients with bilateral monofocal intraocular lens implantation. However, the crossed monovision, which is to correct the dominant eye for near vision and the non-dominant eye for distant vision, has been mentioned preferable for high myopic cataract patients by some studies. We have conducted this study to compare clinical results to assess the feasibility of conventional and crossed monovision for high myopic pseudophakic patients by comparing patient satisfaction, visual function and spectacle independence. METHOD: Forty-sixth high myopia patients were divided into two groups: 22 in crossed monovision group with patients whose refraction targeted to − 2.00 diopters (D) in the dominant eye and − 0.50D in the non-dominant eye; 24 in conventional monovision group with patients whose refraction targeted to − 0.50D in the dominant eye and − 2.00D in the non-dominant eye. Binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (BUDVA), binocular uncorrected near visual acuity (BUNVA), binocular corrected distant visual acuity (BCDVA), binocular corrected near visual acuity (BCNVA), contrast visual acuity and stereoacuity were examined at postoperative 2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months. Questionnaires were completed by patients 3 months after binocular surgery to evaluate patients’ satisfaction and spectacle independence. RESULTS: The conventional monovision and the crossed monovision group showed no significant differences of mean BUDVA, BUNVA, BCDVA, BCNVA 2 weeks, 1 month or 3 months postoperatively (P > 0.05). There was no difference in the bilateral contrast sensitivity or stereoscopic function between the convention conventional and crossed monovision groups (P > 0.05). Patient satisfaction with near and distant vision, as well as spectacle dependence did not differ significantly between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Crossed pseudophakic monovision exhibited similar visual function when compared with conventional monovision technique, which indicates that it is an effective option to improve the visual functionality and quality of life for high myopic patients who considering bilateral cataract surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Institutional Review Board and Ethics committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. The trial registration was submitted in September 2018 and passed on March 18, 2020, and the registration number is: ChiCTR2000030935.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7667742
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76677422020-11-17 Crossed versus conventional pseudophakic monovision for high myopic eyes: a prospective, randomized pilot study Xun, Yan Wan, Wenjuan Jiang, Lu Hu, Ke BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: Aiming at spectacle independence, conventional pseudophakic monovision has been widely used in myopia patients with bilateral monofocal intraocular lens implantation. However, the crossed monovision, which is to correct the dominant eye for near vision and the non-dominant eye for distant vision, has been mentioned preferable for high myopic cataract patients by some studies. We have conducted this study to compare clinical results to assess the feasibility of conventional and crossed monovision for high myopic pseudophakic patients by comparing patient satisfaction, visual function and spectacle independence. METHOD: Forty-sixth high myopia patients were divided into two groups: 22 in crossed monovision group with patients whose refraction targeted to − 2.00 diopters (D) in the dominant eye and − 0.50D in the non-dominant eye; 24 in conventional monovision group with patients whose refraction targeted to − 0.50D in the dominant eye and − 2.00D in the non-dominant eye. Binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (BUDVA), binocular uncorrected near visual acuity (BUNVA), binocular corrected distant visual acuity (BCDVA), binocular corrected near visual acuity (BCNVA), contrast visual acuity and stereoacuity were examined at postoperative 2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months. Questionnaires were completed by patients 3 months after binocular surgery to evaluate patients’ satisfaction and spectacle independence. RESULTS: The conventional monovision and the crossed monovision group showed no significant differences of mean BUDVA, BUNVA, BCDVA, BCNVA 2 weeks, 1 month or 3 months postoperatively (P > 0.05). There was no difference in the bilateral contrast sensitivity or stereoscopic function between the convention conventional and crossed monovision groups (P > 0.05). Patient satisfaction with near and distant vision, as well as spectacle dependence did not differ significantly between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Crossed pseudophakic monovision exhibited similar visual function when compared with conventional monovision technique, which indicates that it is an effective option to improve the visual functionality and quality of life for high myopic patients who considering bilateral cataract surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Institutional Review Board and Ethics committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. The trial registration was submitted in September 2018 and passed on March 18, 2020, and the registration number is: ChiCTR2000030935. BioMed Central 2020-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7667742/ /pubmed/33198710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01694-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Xun, Yan
Wan, Wenjuan
Jiang, Lu
Hu, Ke
Crossed versus conventional pseudophakic monovision for high myopic eyes: a prospective, randomized pilot study
title Crossed versus conventional pseudophakic monovision for high myopic eyes: a prospective, randomized pilot study
title_full Crossed versus conventional pseudophakic monovision for high myopic eyes: a prospective, randomized pilot study
title_fullStr Crossed versus conventional pseudophakic monovision for high myopic eyes: a prospective, randomized pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Crossed versus conventional pseudophakic monovision for high myopic eyes: a prospective, randomized pilot study
title_short Crossed versus conventional pseudophakic monovision for high myopic eyes: a prospective, randomized pilot study
title_sort crossed versus conventional pseudophakic monovision for high myopic eyes: a prospective, randomized pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7667742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33198710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01694-5
work_keys_str_mv AT xunyan crossedversusconventionalpseudophakicmonovisionforhighmyopiceyesaprospectiverandomizedpilotstudy
AT wanwenjuan crossedversusconventionalpseudophakicmonovisionforhighmyopiceyesaprospectiverandomizedpilotstudy
AT jianglu crossedversusconventionalpseudophakicmonovisionforhighmyopiceyesaprospectiverandomizedpilotstudy
AT huke crossedversusconventionalpseudophakicmonovisionforhighmyopiceyesaprospectiverandomizedpilotstudy