Cargando…
Antimicrobial activity of omadacycline in vitro against bacteria isolated from 2014 to 2017 in China, a multi-center study
BACKGROUND: Omadacycline (ZL-2401) is a semi-synthetic derivative of minocycline. It has a broadspectrum activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, and atypical pathogens. The objective of this study was to evaluate the antibacterial activity of omadacycline against recently collecte...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7667747/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33198626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-02019-8 |
_version_ | 1783610373880938496 |
---|---|
author | Xiao, Meng Huang, Jing-jing Zhang, Ge Yang, Wen-hang Kong, Fanrong Kudinha, Timothy Xu, Ying-chun |
author_facet | Xiao, Meng Huang, Jing-jing Zhang, Ge Yang, Wen-hang Kong, Fanrong Kudinha, Timothy Xu, Ying-chun |
author_sort | Xiao, Meng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Omadacycline (ZL-2401) is a semi-synthetic derivative of minocycline. It has a broadspectrum activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, and atypical pathogens. The objective of this study was to evaluate the antibacterial activity of omadacycline against recently collected bacterial isolates from Chinese patients. RESULTS: Omadacycline showed potent activity against all Gram-positive pathogens: S. aureus MICs were low regardless of susceptibility to methicillin (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA: N = 97, MIC(50/90) 0.12/0.25 mg/L, 98.5% susceptible; methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, MSSA: N = 100, MIC(50/90) 0.12/0.12 mg/L, 100.0% susceptible). Omadacycline was also very effective against β-haemolytic streptococci (MIC(50/90), 0.06/0.12 mg/L), viridans group streptococci (MIC(50/90),<0.03/0. 06 mg/L), and enterococci (MIC(50/90), 0.03/0.12 mg/L). Against S. pneumoniae, omadacycline was highly active regardless of penicillin-resistance (MIC(90) 0.06 mg/L) and despite the fact that less than 10.0% of these strains were susceptible to tetracycline. Omadacycline exhibited good in vitro activity against Enterobacterales isolates (MIC(50/90), 2/8 mg/L), inhibiting 81.7% of the isolates at ≤4 mg/L. M. catarrhalis isolates (MIC(50/90), 0.12/0.25 mg/L) were fully susceptible to omadacycline at ≤0.5 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: Omadacycline showed potent in vitro activity against most common bacterial pathogens, and even against highly resistant problem pathogens, such as MRSA, penicillin-R and tetracycline-R S. pneumoniae and enterococci. The susceptibility rate of Chinese isolates was similar to those reported in other countries, but the decreased activity against K. pneumoniae isolates in the present study should be noted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7667747 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76677472020-11-17 Antimicrobial activity of omadacycline in vitro against bacteria isolated from 2014 to 2017 in China, a multi-center study Xiao, Meng Huang, Jing-jing Zhang, Ge Yang, Wen-hang Kong, Fanrong Kudinha, Timothy Xu, Ying-chun BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Omadacycline (ZL-2401) is a semi-synthetic derivative of minocycline. It has a broadspectrum activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, and atypical pathogens. The objective of this study was to evaluate the antibacterial activity of omadacycline against recently collected bacterial isolates from Chinese patients. RESULTS: Omadacycline showed potent activity against all Gram-positive pathogens: S. aureus MICs were low regardless of susceptibility to methicillin (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA: N = 97, MIC(50/90) 0.12/0.25 mg/L, 98.5% susceptible; methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, MSSA: N = 100, MIC(50/90) 0.12/0.12 mg/L, 100.0% susceptible). Omadacycline was also very effective against β-haemolytic streptococci (MIC(50/90), 0.06/0.12 mg/L), viridans group streptococci (MIC(50/90),<0.03/0. 06 mg/L), and enterococci (MIC(50/90), 0.03/0.12 mg/L). Against S. pneumoniae, omadacycline was highly active regardless of penicillin-resistance (MIC(90) 0.06 mg/L) and despite the fact that less than 10.0% of these strains were susceptible to tetracycline. Omadacycline exhibited good in vitro activity against Enterobacterales isolates (MIC(50/90), 2/8 mg/L), inhibiting 81.7% of the isolates at ≤4 mg/L. M. catarrhalis isolates (MIC(50/90), 0.12/0.25 mg/L) were fully susceptible to omadacycline at ≤0.5 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: Omadacycline showed potent in vitro activity against most common bacterial pathogens, and even against highly resistant problem pathogens, such as MRSA, penicillin-R and tetracycline-R S. pneumoniae and enterococci. The susceptibility rate of Chinese isolates was similar to those reported in other countries, but the decreased activity against K. pneumoniae isolates in the present study should be noted. BioMed Central 2020-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7667747/ /pubmed/33198626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-02019-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Xiao, Meng Huang, Jing-jing Zhang, Ge Yang, Wen-hang Kong, Fanrong Kudinha, Timothy Xu, Ying-chun Antimicrobial activity of omadacycline in vitro against bacteria isolated from 2014 to 2017 in China, a multi-center study |
title | Antimicrobial activity of omadacycline in vitro against bacteria isolated from 2014 to 2017 in China, a multi-center study |
title_full | Antimicrobial activity of omadacycline in vitro against bacteria isolated from 2014 to 2017 in China, a multi-center study |
title_fullStr | Antimicrobial activity of omadacycline in vitro against bacteria isolated from 2014 to 2017 in China, a multi-center study |
title_full_unstemmed | Antimicrobial activity of omadacycline in vitro against bacteria isolated from 2014 to 2017 in China, a multi-center study |
title_short | Antimicrobial activity of omadacycline in vitro against bacteria isolated from 2014 to 2017 in China, a multi-center study |
title_sort | antimicrobial activity of omadacycline in vitro against bacteria isolated from 2014 to 2017 in china, a multi-center study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7667747/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33198626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-02019-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiaomeng antimicrobialactivityofomadacyclineinvitroagainstbacteriaisolatedfrom2014to2017inchinaamulticenterstudy AT huangjingjing antimicrobialactivityofomadacyclineinvitroagainstbacteriaisolatedfrom2014to2017inchinaamulticenterstudy AT zhangge antimicrobialactivityofomadacyclineinvitroagainstbacteriaisolatedfrom2014to2017inchinaamulticenterstudy AT yangwenhang antimicrobialactivityofomadacyclineinvitroagainstbacteriaisolatedfrom2014to2017inchinaamulticenterstudy AT kongfanrong antimicrobialactivityofomadacyclineinvitroagainstbacteriaisolatedfrom2014to2017inchinaamulticenterstudy AT kudinhatimothy antimicrobialactivityofomadacyclineinvitroagainstbacteriaisolatedfrom2014to2017inchinaamulticenterstudy AT xuyingchun antimicrobialactivityofomadacyclineinvitroagainstbacteriaisolatedfrom2014to2017inchinaamulticenterstudy |