Cargando…

Safety and efficacy of manual vacuum suction compared with conventional dilatation and sharp curettage and electric vacuum aspiration in surgical treatment of miscarriage: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization does not recommend dilatation and sharp curettage (D&C) for the surgical treatment of miscarriage during the first trimester because this may cause Asherman’s syndrome due to endometrial damage; therefore, suction remains the primary treatment option. Wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kakinuma, Toshiyuki, Kakinuma, Kaoru, Sakamoto, Yuuka, Kawarai, Yoshimasa, Saito, Koyomi, Ihara, Motomasa, Matsuda, Yoshio, Sato, Ikuo, Ohwada, Michitaka, Yanagida, Kaoru, Tanaka, Hirokazu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7667767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33198679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03362-4
_version_ 1783610378709630976
author Kakinuma, Toshiyuki
Kakinuma, Kaoru
Sakamoto, Yuuka
Kawarai, Yoshimasa
Saito, Koyomi
Ihara, Motomasa
Matsuda, Yoshio
Sato, Ikuo
Ohwada, Michitaka
Yanagida, Kaoru
Tanaka, Hirokazu
author_facet Kakinuma, Toshiyuki
Kakinuma, Kaoru
Sakamoto, Yuuka
Kawarai, Yoshimasa
Saito, Koyomi
Ihara, Motomasa
Matsuda, Yoshio
Sato, Ikuo
Ohwada, Michitaka
Yanagida, Kaoru
Tanaka, Hirokazu
author_sort Kakinuma, Toshiyuki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization does not recommend dilatation and sharp curettage (D&C) for the surgical treatment of miscarriage during the first trimester because this may cause Asherman’s syndrome due to endometrial damage; therefore, suction remains the primary treatment option. While manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) has been widely used since the 1990s outside Japan, the use of an MVA device (Women’s MVA system) was approved in Japan in October 2015. Here, we examined the efficacy of the MVA kit in women surgically treated for miscarriage. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2014 and 2018 at the International University of Health and Welfare Hospital in Japan. Women who underwent surgical treatment for miscarriage within 12 weeks of pregnancy were identified and enrolled in the study. A total of 404 women were included who underwent the following procedures: 121 D&C, 123 electric vacuum aspiration (EVA), and 160 MVA. For each participant, the duration of surgery, amount of bleeding, amount of anesthetic used, incomplete abortion requiring repeat procedures, and intraoperative/postoperative complications were evaluated. RESULTS: The duration of surgery was 13.7 ± 7.2, 11.2 ± 4.2, and 6.9 ± 4.3 min in the D&C, EVA, and MVA groups, respectively (p = 1.00). The amount of anesthetic used was not significantly different among all groups. Bleeding of ≥ 100 mL was confirmed in three (2.4%), one (0.8%), and one (0.6%) patient(s) in the D&C, EVA, and MVA groups, respectively (p = 0.50). Incomplete abortion was identified in three (2.4%), two (1.6%), and one (0.6%) patient(s) in the D&C, EVA, and MVA groups, respectively (p = 0.61). However, severe intraoperative/postoperative complications were not observed in any group. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment for miscarriage performed using the MVA kit has safety and efficacy similar to those of conventional methods, such as D&C and EVA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7667767
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76677672020-11-17 Safety and efficacy of manual vacuum suction compared with conventional dilatation and sharp curettage and electric vacuum aspiration in surgical treatment of miscarriage: a randomized controlled trial Kakinuma, Toshiyuki Kakinuma, Kaoru Sakamoto, Yuuka Kawarai, Yoshimasa Saito, Koyomi Ihara, Motomasa Matsuda, Yoshio Sato, Ikuo Ohwada, Michitaka Yanagida, Kaoru Tanaka, Hirokazu BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization does not recommend dilatation and sharp curettage (D&C) for the surgical treatment of miscarriage during the first trimester because this may cause Asherman’s syndrome due to endometrial damage; therefore, suction remains the primary treatment option. While manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) has been widely used since the 1990s outside Japan, the use of an MVA device (Women’s MVA system) was approved in Japan in October 2015. Here, we examined the efficacy of the MVA kit in women surgically treated for miscarriage. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2014 and 2018 at the International University of Health and Welfare Hospital in Japan. Women who underwent surgical treatment for miscarriage within 12 weeks of pregnancy were identified and enrolled in the study. A total of 404 women were included who underwent the following procedures: 121 D&C, 123 electric vacuum aspiration (EVA), and 160 MVA. For each participant, the duration of surgery, amount of bleeding, amount of anesthetic used, incomplete abortion requiring repeat procedures, and intraoperative/postoperative complications were evaluated. RESULTS: The duration of surgery was 13.7 ± 7.2, 11.2 ± 4.2, and 6.9 ± 4.3 min in the D&C, EVA, and MVA groups, respectively (p = 1.00). The amount of anesthetic used was not significantly different among all groups. Bleeding of ≥ 100 mL was confirmed in three (2.4%), one (0.8%), and one (0.6%) patient(s) in the D&C, EVA, and MVA groups, respectively (p = 0.50). Incomplete abortion was identified in three (2.4%), two (1.6%), and one (0.6%) patient(s) in the D&C, EVA, and MVA groups, respectively (p = 0.61). However, severe intraoperative/postoperative complications were not observed in any group. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment for miscarriage performed using the MVA kit has safety and efficacy similar to those of conventional methods, such as D&C and EVA. BioMed Central 2020-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7667767/ /pubmed/33198679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03362-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kakinuma, Toshiyuki
Kakinuma, Kaoru
Sakamoto, Yuuka
Kawarai, Yoshimasa
Saito, Koyomi
Ihara, Motomasa
Matsuda, Yoshio
Sato, Ikuo
Ohwada, Michitaka
Yanagida, Kaoru
Tanaka, Hirokazu
Safety and efficacy of manual vacuum suction compared with conventional dilatation and sharp curettage and electric vacuum aspiration in surgical treatment of miscarriage: a randomized controlled trial
title Safety and efficacy of manual vacuum suction compared with conventional dilatation and sharp curettage and electric vacuum aspiration in surgical treatment of miscarriage: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Safety and efficacy of manual vacuum suction compared with conventional dilatation and sharp curettage and electric vacuum aspiration in surgical treatment of miscarriage: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of manual vacuum suction compared with conventional dilatation and sharp curettage and electric vacuum aspiration in surgical treatment of miscarriage: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of manual vacuum suction compared with conventional dilatation and sharp curettage and electric vacuum aspiration in surgical treatment of miscarriage: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Safety and efficacy of manual vacuum suction compared with conventional dilatation and sharp curettage and electric vacuum aspiration in surgical treatment of miscarriage: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort safety and efficacy of manual vacuum suction compared with conventional dilatation and sharp curettage and electric vacuum aspiration in surgical treatment of miscarriage: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7667767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33198679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03362-4
work_keys_str_mv AT kakinumatoshiyuki safetyandefficacyofmanualvacuumsuctioncomparedwithconventionaldilatationandsharpcurettageandelectricvacuumaspirationinsurgicaltreatmentofmiscarriagearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kakinumakaoru safetyandefficacyofmanualvacuumsuctioncomparedwithconventionaldilatationandsharpcurettageandelectricvacuumaspirationinsurgicaltreatmentofmiscarriagearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sakamotoyuuka safetyandefficacyofmanualvacuumsuctioncomparedwithconventionaldilatationandsharpcurettageandelectricvacuumaspirationinsurgicaltreatmentofmiscarriagearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kawaraiyoshimasa safetyandefficacyofmanualvacuumsuctioncomparedwithconventionaldilatationandsharpcurettageandelectricvacuumaspirationinsurgicaltreatmentofmiscarriagearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT saitokoyomi safetyandefficacyofmanualvacuumsuctioncomparedwithconventionaldilatationandsharpcurettageandelectricvacuumaspirationinsurgicaltreatmentofmiscarriagearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT iharamotomasa safetyandefficacyofmanualvacuumsuctioncomparedwithconventionaldilatationandsharpcurettageandelectricvacuumaspirationinsurgicaltreatmentofmiscarriagearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT matsudayoshio safetyandefficacyofmanualvacuumsuctioncomparedwithconventionaldilatationandsharpcurettageandelectricvacuumaspirationinsurgicaltreatmentofmiscarriagearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT satoikuo safetyandefficacyofmanualvacuumsuctioncomparedwithconventionaldilatationandsharpcurettageandelectricvacuumaspirationinsurgicaltreatmentofmiscarriagearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ohwadamichitaka safetyandefficacyofmanualvacuumsuctioncomparedwithconventionaldilatationandsharpcurettageandelectricvacuumaspirationinsurgicaltreatmentofmiscarriagearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yanagidakaoru safetyandefficacyofmanualvacuumsuctioncomparedwithconventionaldilatationandsharpcurettageandelectricvacuumaspirationinsurgicaltreatmentofmiscarriagearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tanakahirokazu safetyandefficacyofmanualvacuumsuctioncomparedwithconventionaldilatationandsharpcurettageandelectricvacuumaspirationinsurgicaltreatmentofmiscarriagearandomizedcontrolledtrial