Cargando…
Utility of Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasound for the Guidance and Monitoring of Endoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Interventional endoscopists may utilize contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CEH-EUS) for image guidance during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) because of its capability to delineate real-time tumor perfusion dynamics. The purpose of this study was to assess the utility o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Editorial Office of Gut and Liver
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7667920/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32000466 http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl19123 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND/AIMS: Interventional endoscopists may utilize contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CEH-EUS) for image guidance during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) because of its capability to delineate real-time tumor perfusion dynamics. The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of CEH-EUS for the guidance and monitoring of endoscopic RFA. METHODS: Nineteen consecutive patients with solid abdominal tumors who underwent CEH-EUS and endoscopic RFA were included. The extent of the ablation was assessed by CEH-EUS at 5 to 7 days after RFA. Additional RFAs were performed under CEH-EUS guidance. RESULTS: The diagnoses were as follows nonfunctioning neuroendocrine tumor (n=13), solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) (n=2), insulinoma (n=1), left adrenal adenoma (n=2), and left adrenal oligometastasis (n=1). Pre-CEH-EUS findings revealed that 17 cases showed hyperenhanced patterns and two cases of SPN showed isoenhanced patterns. CEH-EUS-assisted RFA was technically feasible in all 19 patients. After the first RFA session, seven patients of the treated tumors showed the disappearance of intratumoral enhancement on CEH-EUS, whereas 12 showed residual contrast enhancement. Twelve patients with incomplete ablation were further treated with additional RFA under real-time CEH-EUS guidance. Radiologic complete response was observed in 13 patients (68.4%). Among the 35 ablation procedures, the only adverse events were two episodes of pancreatitis (5.7%; 1 moderate and 1 mild). During the median follow-up of 28 months, the local recurrence rate was 7.7%. CONCLUSIONS: The application of CEH-EUS for RFA could be helpful in assessing early treatment response after ablation and targeting residual viable tumors during additional ablation sessions. |
---|