Cargando…

Collateral Status in Ischemic Stroke: A Comparison of Computed Tomography Angiography, Computed Tomography Perfusion, and Digital Subtraction Angiography

OBJECTIVE: To compare assessment of collaterals by single-phase computed tomography (CT) angiography (CTA) and CT perfusion-derived 3-phase CTA, multiphase CTA and temporal maximum-intensity projection (tMIP) images to digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and relate collateral assessments to clini...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kauw, Frans, Dankbaar, Jan W., Martin, Blake W., Ding, Victoria Y., Boothroyd, Derek B., van Ommen, Fasco, de Jong, Hugo W.A.M., Kappelle, L. Jaap, Velthuis, Birgitta K., Heit, Jeremy J., Wintermark, Max
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7668337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33196604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001090
_version_ 1783610466397847552
author Kauw, Frans
Dankbaar, Jan W.
Martin, Blake W.
Ding, Victoria Y.
Boothroyd, Derek B.
van Ommen, Fasco
de Jong, Hugo W.A.M.
Kappelle, L. Jaap
Velthuis, Birgitta K.
Heit, Jeremy J.
Wintermark, Max
author_facet Kauw, Frans
Dankbaar, Jan W.
Martin, Blake W.
Ding, Victoria Y.
Boothroyd, Derek B.
van Ommen, Fasco
de Jong, Hugo W.A.M.
Kappelle, L. Jaap
Velthuis, Birgitta K.
Heit, Jeremy J.
Wintermark, Max
author_sort Kauw, Frans
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare assessment of collaterals by single-phase computed tomography (CT) angiography (CTA) and CT perfusion-derived 3-phase CTA, multiphase CTA and temporal maximum-intensity projection (tMIP) images to digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and relate collateral assessments to clinical outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: Consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients who underwent CT perfusion, CTA, and DSA before thrombectomy with occlusion of the internal carotid artery, the M1 or the M2 segments were included. Two observers assessed all CT images and one separate observer assessed DSA (reference standard) with static and dynamic (modified American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology) collateral grading methods. Interobserver agreement and concordance were quantified with Cohen-weighted κ and concordance correlation coefficient, respectively. Imaging assessments were related to clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale, ≤ 2). RESULTS: Interobserver agreement (n = 101) was 0.46 (tMIP), 0.58 (3-phase CTA), 0.67 (multiphase CTA), and 0.69 (single-phase CTA) for static assessments and 0.52 (3-phase CTA) and 0.54 (multiphase CTA) for dynamic assessments. Concordance correlation coefficient (n = 80) was 0.08 (3-phase CTA), 0.09 (single-phase CTA), and 0.23 (multiphase CTA) for static assessments and 0.10 (3-phase CTA) and 0.27 (multiphase CTA) for dynamic assessments. Higher static collateral scores on multiphase CTA (odds ratio [OR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1–2.7) and tMIP images (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1–3.4) were associated with modified Rankin Scale of 2 or less as were higher modified American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology scores on 3-phase CTA (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1–2.2) and multiphase CTA (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1–2.6). CONCLUSIONS: Concordance between assessments on CT and DSA was poor. Collateral status evaluated on 3-phase CTA and multiphase CTA, but not on DSA, was associated with clinical outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7668337
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76683372020-11-16 Collateral Status in Ischemic Stroke: A Comparison of Computed Tomography Angiography, Computed Tomography Perfusion, and Digital Subtraction Angiography Kauw, Frans Dankbaar, Jan W. Martin, Blake W. Ding, Victoria Y. Boothroyd, Derek B. van Ommen, Fasco de Jong, Hugo W.A.M. Kappelle, L. Jaap Velthuis, Birgitta K. Heit, Jeremy J. Wintermark, Max J Comput Assist Tomogr Neuroradiology OBJECTIVE: To compare assessment of collaterals by single-phase computed tomography (CT) angiography (CTA) and CT perfusion-derived 3-phase CTA, multiphase CTA and temporal maximum-intensity projection (tMIP) images to digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and relate collateral assessments to clinical outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: Consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients who underwent CT perfusion, CTA, and DSA before thrombectomy with occlusion of the internal carotid artery, the M1 or the M2 segments were included. Two observers assessed all CT images and one separate observer assessed DSA (reference standard) with static and dynamic (modified American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology) collateral grading methods. Interobserver agreement and concordance were quantified with Cohen-weighted κ and concordance correlation coefficient, respectively. Imaging assessments were related to clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale, ≤ 2). RESULTS: Interobserver agreement (n = 101) was 0.46 (tMIP), 0.58 (3-phase CTA), 0.67 (multiphase CTA), and 0.69 (single-phase CTA) for static assessments and 0.52 (3-phase CTA) and 0.54 (multiphase CTA) for dynamic assessments. Concordance correlation coefficient (n = 80) was 0.08 (3-phase CTA), 0.09 (single-phase CTA), and 0.23 (multiphase CTA) for static assessments and 0.10 (3-phase CTA) and 0.27 (multiphase CTA) for dynamic assessments. Higher static collateral scores on multiphase CTA (odds ratio [OR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1–2.7) and tMIP images (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1–3.4) were associated with modified Rankin Scale of 2 or less as were higher modified American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology scores on 3-phase CTA (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1–2.2) and multiphase CTA (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1–2.6). CONCLUSIONS: Concordance between assessments on CT and DSA was poor. Collateral status evaluated on 3-phase CTA and multiphase CTA, but not on DSA, was associated with clinical outcome. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020 2020-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7668337/ /pubmed/33196604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001090 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Neuroradiology
Kauw, Frans
Dankbaar, Jan W.
Martin, Blake W.
Ding, Victoria Y.
Boothroyd, Derek B.
van Ommen, Fasco
de Jong, Hugo W.A.M.
Kappelle, L. Jaap
Velthuis, Birgitta K.
Heit, Jeremy J.
Wintermark, Max
Collateral Status in Ischemic Stroke: A Comparison of Computed Tomography Angiography, Computed Tomography Perfusion, and Digital Subtraction Angiography
title Collateral Status in Ischemic Stroke: A Comparison of Computed Tomography Angiography, Computed Tomography Perfusion, and Digital Subtraction Angiography
title_full Collateral Status in Ischemic Stroke: A Comparison of Computed Tomography Angiography, Computed Tomography Perfusion, and Digital Subtraction Angiography
title_fullStr Collateral Status in Ischemic Stroke: A Comparison of Computed Tomography Angiography, Computed Tomography Perfusion, and Digital Subtraction Angiography
title_full_unstemmed Collateral Status in Ischemic Stroke: A Comparison of Computed Tomography Angiography, Computed Tomography Perfusion, and Digital Subtraction Angiography
title_short Collateral Status in Ischemic Stroke: A Comparison of Computed Tomography Angiography, Computed Tomography Perfusion, and Digital Subtraction Angiography
title_sort collateral status in ischemic stroke: a comparison of computed tomography angiography, computed tomography perfusion, and digital subtraction angiography
topic Neuroradiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7668337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33196604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001090
work_keys_str_mv AT kauwfrans collateralstatusinischemicstrokeacomparisonofcomputedtomographyangiographycomputedtomographyperfusionanddigitalsubtractionangiography
AT dankbaarjanw collateralstatusinischemicstrokeacomparisonofcomputedtomographyangiographycomputedtomographyperfusionanddigitalsubtractionangiography
AT martinblakew collateralstatusinischemicstrokeacomparisonofcomputedtomographyangiographycomputedtomographyperfusionanddigitalsubtractionangiography
AT dingvictoriay collateralstatusinischemicstrokeacomparisonofcomputedtomographyangiographycomputedtomographyperfusionanddigitalsubtractionangiography
AT boothroydderekb collateralstatusinischemicstrokeacomparisonofcomputedtomographyangiographycomputedtomographyperfusionanddigitalsubtractionangiography
AT vanommenfasco collateralstatusinischemicstrokeacomparisonofcomputedtomographyangiographycomputedtomographyperfusionanddigitalsubtractionangiography
AT dejonghugowam collateralstatusinischemicstrokeacomparisonofcomputedtomographyangiographycomputedtomographyperfusionanddigitalsubtractionangiography
AT kappelleljaap collateralstatusinischemicstrokeacomparisonofcomputedtomographyangiographycomputedtomographyperfusionanddigitalsubtractionangiography
AT velthuisbirgittak collateralstatusinischemicstrokeacomparisonofcomputedtomographyangiographycomputedtomographyperfusionanddigitalsubtractionangiography
AT heitjeremyj collateralstatusinischemicstrokeacomparisonofcomputedtomographyangiographycomputedtomographyperfusionanddigitalsubtractionangiography
AT wintermarkmax collateralstatusinischemicstrokeacomparisonofcomputedtomographyangiographycomputedtomographyperfusionanddigitalsubtractionangiography