Cargando…
Collateral Status in Ischemic Stroke: A Comparison of Computed Tomography Angiography, Computed Tomography Perfusion, and Digital Subtraction Angiography
OBJECTIVE: To compare assessment of collaterals by single-phase computed tomography (CT) angiography (CTA) and CT perfusion-derived 3-phase CTA, multiphase CTA and temporal maximum-intensity projection (tMIP) images to digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and relate collateral assessments to clini...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7668337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33196604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001090 |
_version_ | 1783610466397847552 |
---|---|
author | Kauw, Frans Dankbaar, Jan W. Martin, Blake W. Ding, Victoria Y. Boothroyd, Derek B. van Ommen, Fasco de Jong, Hugo W.A.M. Kappelle, L. Jaap Velthuis, Birgitta K. Heit, Jeremy J. Wintermark, Max |
author_facet | Kauw, Frans Dankbaar, Jan W. Martin, Blake W. Ding, Victoria Y. Boothroyd, Derek B. van Ommen, Fasco de Jong, Hugo W.A.M. Kappelle, L. Jaap Velthuis, Birgitta K. Heit, Jeremy J. Wintermark, Max |
author_sort | Kauw, Frans |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare assessment of collaterals by single-phase computed tomography (CT) angiography (CTA) and CT perfusion-derived 3-phase CTA, multiphase CTA and temporal maximum-intensity projection (tMIP) images to digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and relate collateral assessments to clinical outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: Consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients who underwent CT perfusion, CTA, and DSA before thrombectomy with occlusion of the internal carotid artery, the M1 or the M2 segments were included. Two observers assessed all CT images and one separate observer assessed DSA (reference standard) with static and dynamic (modified American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology) collateral grading methods. Interobserver agreement and concordance were quantified with Cohen-weighted κ and concordance correlation coefficient, respectively. Imaging assessments were related to clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale, ≤ 2). RESULTS: Interobserver agreement (n = 101) was 0.46 (tMIP), 0.58 (3-phase CTA), 0.67 (multiphase CTA), and 0.69 (single-phase CTA) for static assessments and 0.52 (3-phase CTA) and 0.54 (multiphase CTA) for dynamic assessments. Concordance correlation coefficient (n = 80) was 0.08 (3-phase CTA), 0.09 (single-phase CTA), and 0.23 (multiphase CTA) for static assessments and 0.10 (3-phase CTA) and 0.27 (multiphase CTA) for dynamic assessments. Higher static collateral scores on multiphase CTA (odds ratio [OR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1–2.7) and tMIP images (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1–3.4) were associated with modified Rankin Scale of 2 or less as were higher modified American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology scores on 3-phase CTA (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1–2.2) and multiphase CTA (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1–2.6). CONCLUSIONS: Concordance between assessments on CT and DSA was poor. Collateral status evaluated on 3-phase CTA and multiphase CTA, but not on DSA, was associated with clinical outcome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7668337 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76683372020-11-16 Collateral Status in Ischemic Stroke: A Comparison of Computed Tomography Angiography, Computed Tomography Perfusion, and Digital Subtraction Angiography Kauw, Frans Dankbaar, Jan W. Martin, Blake W. Ding, Victoria Y. Boothroyd, Derek B. van Ommen, Fasco de Jong, Hugo W.A.M. Kappelle, L. Jaap Velthuis, Birgitta K. Heit, Jeremy J. Wintermark, Max J Comput Assist Tomogr Neuroradiology OBJECTIVE: To compare assessment of collaterals by single-phase computed tomography (CT) angiography (CTA) and CT perfusion-derived 3-phase CTA, multiphase CTA and temporal maximum-intensity projection (tMIP) images to digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and relate collateral assessments to clinical outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: Consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients who underwent CT perfusion, CTA, and DSA before thrombectomy with occlusion of the internal carotid artery, the M1 or the M2 segments were included. Two observers assessed all CT images and one separate observer assessed DSA (reference standard) with static and dynamic (modified American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology) collateral grading methods. Interobserver agreement and concordance were quantified with Cohen-weighted κ and concordance correlation coefficient, respectively. Imaging assessments were related to clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale, ≤ 2). RESULTS: Interobserver agreement (n = 101) was 0.46 (tMIP), 0.58 (3-phase CTA), 0.67 (multiphase CTA), and 0.69 (single-phase CTA) for static assessments and 0.52 (3-phase CTA) and 0.54 (multiphase CTA) for dynamic assessments. Concordance correlation coefficient (n = 80) was 0.08 (3-phase CTA), 0.09 (single-phase CTA), and 0.23 (multiphase CTA) for static assessments and 0.10 (3-phase CTA) and 0.27 (multiphase CTA) for dynamic assessments. Higher static collateral scores on multiphase CTA (odds ratio [OR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1–2.7) and tMIP images (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1–3.4) were associated with modified Rankin Scale of 2 or less as were higher modified American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology scores on 3-phase CTA (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1–2.2) and multiphase CTA (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1–2.6). CONCLUSIONS: Concordance between assessments on CT and DSA was poor. Collateral status evaluated on 3-phase CTA and multiphase CTA, but not on DSA, was associated with clinical outcome. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020 2020-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7668337/ /pubmed/33196604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001090 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Neuroradiology Kauw, Frans Dankbaar, Jan W. Martin, Blake W. Ding, Victoria Y. Boothroyd, Derek B. van Ommen, Fasco de Jong, Hugo W.A.M. Kappelle, L. Jaap Velthuis, Birgitta K. Heit, Jeremy J. Wintermark, Max Collateral Status in Ischemic Stroke: A Comparison of Computed Tomography Angiography, Computed Tomography Perfusion, and Digital Subtraction Angiography |
title | Collateral Status in Ischemic Stroke: A Comparison of Computed Tomography Angiography, Computed Tomography Perfusion, and Digital Subtraction Angiography |
title_full | Collateral Status in Ischemic Stroke: A Comparison of Computed Tomography Angiography, Computed Tomography Perfusion, and Digital Subtraction Angiography |
title_fullStr | Collateral Status in Ischemic Stroke: A Comparison of Computed Tomography Angiography, Computed Tomography Perfusion, and Digital Subtraction Angiography |
title_full_unstemmed | Collateral Status in Ischemic Stroke: A Comparison of Computed Tomography Angiography, Computed Tomography Perfusion, and Digital Subtraction Angiography |
title_short | Collateral Status in Ischemic Stroke: A Comparison of Computed Tomography Angiography, Computed Tomography Perfusion, and Digital Subtraction Angiography |
title_sort | collateral status in ischemic stroke: a comparison of computed tomography angiography, computed tomography perfusion, and digital subtraction angiography |
topic | Neuroradiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7668337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33196604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001090 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kauwfrans collateralstatusinischemicstrokeacomparisonofcomputedtomographyangiographycomputedtomographyperfusionanddigitalsubtractionangiography AT dankbaarjanw collateralstatusinischemicstrokeacomparisonofcomputedtomographyangiographycomputedtomographyperfusionanddigitalsubtractionangiography AT martinblakew collateralstatusinischemicstrokeacomparisonofcomputedtomographyangiographycomputedtomographyperfusionanddigitalsubtractionangiography AT dingvictoriay collateralstatusinischemicstrokeacomparisonofcomputedtomographyangiographycomputedtomographyperfusionanddigitalsubtractionangiography AT boothroydderekb collateralstatusinischemicstrokeacomparisonofcomputedtomographyangiographycomputedtomographyperfusionanddigitalsubtractionangiography AT vanommenfasco collateralstatusinischemicstrokeacomparisonofcomputedtomographyangiographycomputedtomographyperfusionanddigitalsubtractionangiography AT dejonghugowam collateralstatusinischemicstrokeacomparisonofcomputedtomographyangiographycomputedtomographyperfusionanddigitalsubtractionangiography AT kappelleljaap collateralstatusinischemicstrokeacomparisonofcomputedtomographyangiographycomputedtomographyperfusionanddigitalsubtractionangiography AT velthuisbirgittak collateralstatusinischemicstrokeacomparisonofcomputedtomographyangiographycomputedtomographyperfusionanddigitalsubtractionangiography AT heitjeremyj collateralstatusinischemicstrokeacomparisonofcomputedtomographyangiographycomputedtomographyperfusionanddigitalsubtractionangiography AT wintermarkmax collateralstatusinischemicstrokeacomparisonofcomputedtomographyangiographycomputedtomographyperfusionanddigitalsubtractionangiography |