Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of different doses of ropivacaine for laparoscopy-assisted infiltration analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized control trial

BACKGROUND: Wound infiltration analgesia provides effective postoperative pain control in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). However, the efficacy and safety of wound infiltration with different doses of ropivacaine is not well defined. This study investigated the analgesic effec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liang, Min, Chen, Yijiao, Zhu, Wenchao, Zhou, Dachun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7668433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33181643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022540
_version_ 1783610483754926080
author Liang, Min
Chen, Yijiao
Zhu, Wenchao
Zhou, Dachun
author_facet Liang, Min
Chen, Yijiao
Zhu, Wenchao
Zhou, Dachun
author_sort Liang, Min
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Wound infiltration analgesia provides effective postoperative pain control in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). However, the efficacy and safety of wound infiltration with different doses of ropivacaine is not well defined. This study investigated the analgesic effects and pharmacokinetic profile of varying concentrations of ropivacaine at port sites under laparoscopy assistance. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blinded study, 132 patients were assigned to 4 groups: Group H: in which patients were infiltrated with 0.75% ropivacaine; Group M: 0.5% ropivacaine; Group L: 0.2% ropivacaine; and Group C: 0.9% normal saline only. The primary outcome was pain intensity estimated using numeric rating scale (NRS) at discharging from PACU and at 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, and 24 hours after infiltration. Secondary outcomes included plasma concentrations of ropivacaine at 30 minutes after wound infiltration, rescue analgesia requirements after surgery, perioperative vital signs changes, and side effects. RESULTS: The NRS in Group C was significantly higher at rest, and when coughing upon leaving PACU and at 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, and 24 hours after infiltration (P < .05) and rescue analgesic consumption was significantly higher. Notably, these parameters were not significantly different between Groups H, Group M and Group L (P > .05). Intra-operative consumption of sevoflurane and remifentanil, HR at skin incision and MAP at skin incision, as well as 5 minutes after skin incision were significantly higher in Group C than in the other 3 groups (P < .01). In contrast, these parameters were not significantly different between Groups H, Group M and Group L (P > .05). The concentration of ropivacaine at 30 minutes after infiltration in Group H was significantly higher than that of Group L and Group M (P < .05). No significant differences were observed in the occurrence of side effects among the 4 groups (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy-assisted wound infiltration with ropivacaine successfully decreases pain intensity in patients undergoing LC regardless of the doses used. Infiltration with higher doses results in higher plasma concentrations, but below the systematic toxicity threshold.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7668433
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76684332020-11-17 Efficacy and safety of different doses of ropivacaine for laparoscopy-assisted infiltration analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized control trial Liang, Min Chen, Yijiao Zhu, Wenchao Zhou, Dachun Medicine (Baltimore) 3300 BACKGROUND: Wound infiltration analgesia provides effective postoperative pain control in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). However, the efficacy and safety of wound infiltration with different doses of ropivacaine is not well defined. This study investigated the analgesic effects and pharmacokinetic profile of varying concentrations of ropivacaine at port sites under laparoscopy assistance. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blinded study, 132 patients were assigned to 4 groups: Group H: in which patients were infiltrated with 0.75% ropivacaine; Group M: 0.5% ropivacaine; Group L: 0.2% ropivacaine; and Group C: 0.9% normal saline only. The primary outcome was pain intensity estimated using numeric rating scale (NRS) at discharging from PACU and at 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, and 24 hours after infiltration. Secondary outcomes included plasma concentrations of ropivacaine at 30 minutes after wound infiltration, rescue analgesia requirements after surgery, perioperative vital signs changes, and side effects. RESULTS: The NRS in Group C was significantly higher at rest, and when coughing upon leaving PACU and at 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, and 24 hours after infiltration (P < .05) and rescue analgesic consumption was significantly higher. Notably, these parameters were not significantly different between Groups H, Group M and Group L (P > .05). Intra-operative consumption of sevoflurane and remifentanil, HR at skin incision and MAP at skin incision, as well as 5 minutes after skin incision were significantly higher in Group C than in the other 3 groups (P < .01). In contrast, these parameters were not significantly different between Groups H, Group M and Group L (P > .05). The concentration of ropivacaine at 30 minutes after infiltration in Group H was significantly higher than that of Group L and Group M (P < .05). No significant differences were observed in the occurrence of side effects among the 4 groups (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy-assisted wound infiltration with ropivacaine successfully decreases pain intensity in patients undergoing LC regardless of the doses used. Infiltration with higher doses results in higher plasma concentrations, but below the systematic toxicity threshold. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7668433/ /pubmed/33181643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022540 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 3300
Liang, Min
Chen, Yijiao
Zhu, Wenchao
Zhou, Dachun
Efficacy and safety of different doses of ropivacaine for laparoscopy-assisted infiltration analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized control trial
title Efficacy and safety of different doses of ropivacaine for laparoscopy-assisted infiltration analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized control trial
title_full Efficacy and safety of different doses of ropivacaine for laparoscopy-assisted infiltration analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized control trial
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of different doses of ropivacaine for laparoscopy-assisted infiltration analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized control trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of different doses of ropivacaine for laparoscopy-assisted infiltration analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized control trial
title_short Efficacy and safety of different doses of ropivacaine for laparoscopy-assisted infiltration analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized control trial
title_sort efficacy and safety of different doses of ropivacaine for laparoscopy-assisted infiltration analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized control trial
topic 3300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7668433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33181643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022540
work_keys_str_mv AT liangmin efficacyandsafetyofdifferentdosesofropivacaineforlaparoscopyassistedinfiltrationanalgesiainpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystectomyaprospectiverandomizedcontroltrial
AT chenyijiao efficacyandsafetyofdifferentdosesofropivacaineforlaparoscopyassistedinfiltrationanalgesiainpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystectomyaprospectiverandomizedcontroltrial
AT zhuwenchao efficacyandsafetyofdifferentdosesofropivacaineforlaparoscopyassistedinfiltrationanalgesiainpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystectomyaprospectiverandomizedcontroltrial
AT zhoudachun efficacyandsafetyofdifferentdosesofropivacaineforlaparoscopyassistedinfiltrationanalgesiainpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystectomyaprospectiverandomizedcontroltrial