Cargando…
Effects of dextrose prolotherapy on tendinopathy, fasciopathy, and ligament injuries, fact or myth?: A systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVES: Prolotherapy or proliferative therapy is a treatment option for damaged connective tissues involving the injection of a solution (proliferant) which theoretically causes an initial cell injury and a subsequent “proliferant” process of wound healing via modulation of the inflammatory proc...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7668443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33181700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023201 |
_version_ | 1783610485654945792 |
---|---|
author | Chung, Meng-Wu Hsu, Chih-Yang Chung, Wen-Kuei Lin, Yen-Nung |
author_facet | Chung, Meng-Wu Hsu, Chih-Yang Chung, Wen-Kuei Lin, Yen-Nung |
author_sort | Chung, Meng-Wu |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Prolotherapy or proliferative therapy is a treatment option for damaged connective tissues involving the injection of a solution (proliferant) which theoretically causes an initial cell injury and a subsequent “proliferant” process of wound healing via modulation of the inflammatory process. Nonetheless, the benefits of dextrose prolotherapy have not been adequately evaluated. Therefore, the present study assesses the effectiveness and superiority of prolotherapy separately in treating dense fibrous connective tissue injuries. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were searched from the earliest record to February 18, 2019. This study included randomized controlled trials which: 1. involved adult patients with tendinopathy, fasciopathy, and ligament injuries; 2. compared dextrose prolotherapy to placebo or no treatment or corticosteroid injection; 3. provided quantitative measurements of pain and activity before and after intervention. Both analysis at individual studies level and pooled meta-analysis were performed. RESULTS: Ten trials involving 358 participants were included for review. At study level, the majority of comparisons did not reveal significant differences between dextrose prolotherapy and no treatment (or placebo) regarding pain control. The meta-analysis showed dextrose prolotherapy was effective in improving activity only at immediate follow-up (i.e., 0–1 month) (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40–1.50; I(2) = 0%); and superior to corticosteroid injections only in pain reduction at short-term follow-up (i.e., 1–3 month) (SMD: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.14–1.27; I(2) = 51%). No other significant SMDs were found in this analysis. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to support the clinical benefits of dextrose prolotherapy in managing dense fibrous tissue injuries. More high-quality randomized controlled trials are warranted to establish the benefits of dextrose prolotherapy. REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42019129044). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7668443 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76684432020-11-17 Effects of dextrose prolotherapy on tendinopathy, fasciopathy, and ligament injuries, fact or myth?: A systematic review and meta-analysis Chung, Meng-Wu Hsu, Chih-Yang Chung, Wen-Kuei Lin, Yen-Nung Medicine (Baltimore) 6300 OBJECTIVES: Prolotherapy or proliferative therapy is a treatment option for damaged connective tissues involving the injection of a solution (proliferant) which theoretically causes an initial cell injury and a subsequent “proliferant” process of wound healing via modulation of the inflammatory process. Nonetheless, the benefits of dextrose prolotherapy have not been adequately evaluated. Therefore, the present study assesses the effectiveness and superiority of prolotherapy separately in treating dense fibrous connective tissue injuries. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were searched from the earliest record to February 18, 2019. This study included randomized controlled trials which: 1. involved adult patients with tendinopathy, fasciopathy, and ligament injuries; 2. compared dextrose prolotherapy to placebo or no treatment or corticosteroid injection; 3. provided quantitative measurements of pain and activity before and after intervention. Both analysis at individual studies level and pooled meta-analysis were performed. RESULTS: Ten trials involving 358 participants were included for review. At study level, the majority of comparisons did not reveal significant differences between dextrose prolotherapy and no treatment (or placebo) regarding pain control. The meta-analysis showed dextrose prolotherapy was effective in improving activity only at immediate follow-up (i.e., 0–1 month) (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40–1.50; I(2) = 0%); and superior to corticosteroid injections only in pain reduction at short-term follow-up (i.e., 1–3 month) (SMD: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.14–1.27; I(2) = 51%). No other significant SMDs were found in this analysis. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to support the clinical benefits of dextrose prolotherapy in managing dense fibrous tissue injuries. More high-quality randomized controlled trials are warranted to establish the benefits of dextrose prolotherapy. REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42019129044). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7668443/ /pubmed/33181700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023201 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 6300 Chung, Meng-Wu Hsu, Chih-Yang Chung, Wen-Kuei Lin, Yen-Nung Effects of dextrose prolotherapy on tendinopathy, fasciopathy, and ligament injuries, fact or myth?: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Effects of dextrose prolotherapy on tendinopathy, fasciopathy, and ligament injuries, fact or myth?: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Effects of dextrose prolotherapy on tendinopathy, fasciopathy, and ligament injuries, fact or myth?: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Effects of dextrose prolotherapy on tendinopathy, fasciopathy, and ligament injuries, fact or myth?: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of dextrose prolotherapy on tendinopathy, fasciopathy, and ligament injuries, fact or myth?: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Effects of dextrose prolotherapy on tendinopathy, fasciopathy, and ligament injuries, fact or myth?: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | effects of dextrose prolotherapy on tendinopathy, fasciopathy, and ligament injuries, fact or myth?: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | 6300 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7668443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33181700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023201 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chungmengwu effectsofdextroseprolotherapyontendinopathyfasciopathyandligamentinjuriesfactormythasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hsuchihyang effectsofdextroseprolotherapyontendinopathyfasciopathyandligamentinjuriesfactormythasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chungwenkuei effectsofdextroseprolotherapyontendinopathyfasciopathyandligamentinjuriesfactormythasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT linyennung effectsofdextroseprolotherapyontendinopathyfasciopathyandligamentinjuriesfactormythasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |