Cargando…
Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) vs contrast-enhanced computed tomography for multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential: A retrospective analysis for diagnostic performance study
Multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential (MCRNLMP) might be benefited from nephron-sparing surgery. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography is used for the diagnosis of MCRNLMP but contrast-enhanced ultrasound has lack of nephrotoxicity and several advantages over contrast-enhance...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7668474/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33181678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023110 |
_version_ | 1783610493064183808 |
---|---|
author | Shan, Kun FU, A BU DU LI AI ZE ZI HA LI Liu, Ningning Cai, Qiliang Fu, Qingfeng Liu, Leyi Sun, Xiaoyu Zhang, Zhihong |
author_facet | Shan, Kun FU, A BU DU LI AI ZE ZI HA LI Liu, Ningning Cai, Qiliang Fu, Qingfeng Liu, Leyi Sun, Xiaoyu Zhang, Zhihong |
author_sort | Shan, Kun |
collection | PubMed |
description | Multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential (MCRNLMP) might be benefited from nephron-sparing surgery. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography is used for the diagnosis of MCRNLMP but contrast-enhanced ultrasound has lack of nephrotoxicity and several advantages over contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance. The purpose of the study was to compare diagnostic parameters of preoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound against contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the detection of MCRNLMP in patients who faced curative surgery for complex cystic renal mass. Data regarding contrast-enhanced ultrasound, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, and clinicopathological results of 219 patients who underwent curative surgery for complex cystic renal mass (Bosniak classification III or IV) were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Bosniak classification for imaging modality and the 2016 WHO criteria for clinic pathology were used for detection of MCRNLMP. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, and clinicopathology were detected 68, 66, and 67 as a MCRNLMP respectively. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography had 30.37% and 29.27% sensitivities for the detection of MCRNLMP. While 60% and 50% specificities respectively. Bosniak classification III (P = .045) and lower mean Hounsfield unit (P = .049) were associated with the prevalence of MCRNLMP. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography was detected 6 and 7, while contrast-enhanced ultrasound detected 3 and 2 complex cystic renal mass as false positive and false negative MCRNLMP respectively. A contrast-enhanced ultrasound had 0.011 to 1.0 diagnostic confidence and contrast-enhanced computed tomography had 0.045 to 0.983 diagnostic confidence for decision making of nephron-sparing surgeries. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound may have better visualization of MCRNLMP than contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Level of Evidence: III. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7668474 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76684742020-11-17 Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) vs contrast-enhanced computed tomography for multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential: A retrospective analysis for diagnostic performance study Shan, Kun FU, A BU DU LI AI ZE ZI HA LI Liu, Ningning Cai, Qiliang Fu, Qingfeng Liu, Leyi Sun, Xiaoyu Zhang, Zhihong Medicine (Baltimore) 6800 Multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential (MCRNLMP) might be benefited from nephron-sparing surgery. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography is used for the diagnosis of MCRNLMP but contrast-enhanced ultrasound has lack of nephrotoxicity and several advantages over contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance. The purpose of the study was to compare diagnostic parameters of preoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound against contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the detection of MCRNLMP in patients who faced curative surgery for complex cystic renal mass. Data regarding contrast-enhanced ultrasound, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, and clinicopathological results of 219 patients who underwent curative surgery for complex cystic renal mass (Bosniak classification III or IV) were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Bosniak classification for imaging modality and the 2016 WHO criteria for clinic pathology were used for detection of MCRNLMP. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, and clinicopathology were detected 68, 66, and 67 as a MCRNLMP respectively. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography had 30.37% and 29.27% sensitivities for the detection of MCRNLMP. While 60% and 50% specificities respectively. Bosniak classification III (P = .045) and lower mean Hounsfield unit (P = .049) were associated with the prevalence of MCRNLMP. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography was detected 6 and 7, while contrast-enhanced ultrasound detected 3 and 2 complex cystic renal mass as false positive and false negative MCRNLMP respectively. A contrast-enhanced ultrasound had 0.011 to 1.0 diagnostic confidence and contrast-enhanced computed tomography had 0.045 to 0.983 diagnostic confidence for decision making of nephron-sparing surgeries. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound may have better visualization of MCRNLMP than contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Level of Evidence: III. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7668474/ /pubmed/33181678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023110 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 6800 Shan, Kun FU, A BU DU LI AI ZE ZI HA LI Liu, Ningning Cai, Qiliang Fu, Qingfeng Liu, Leyi Sun, Xiaoyu Zhang, Zhihong Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) vs contrast-enhanced computed tomography for multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential: A retrospective analysis for diagnostic performance study |
title | Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) vs contrast-enhanced computed tomography for multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential: A retrospective analysis for diagnostic performance study |
title_full | Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) vs contrast-enhanced computed tomography for multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential: A retrospective analysis for diagnostic performance study |
title_fullStr | Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) vs contrast-enhanced computed tomography for multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential: A retrospective analysis for diagnostic performance study |
title_full_unstemmed | Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) vs contrast-enhanced computed tomography for multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential: A retrospective analysis for diagnostic performance study |
title_short | Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) vs contrast-enhanced computed tomography for multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential: A retrospective analysis for diagnostic performance study |
title_sort | contrast-enhanced ultrasound (ceus) vs contrast-enhanced computed tomography for multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential: a retrospective analysis for diagnostic performance study |
topic | 6800 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7668474/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33181678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023110 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shankun contrastenhancedultrasoundceusvscontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyformultilocularcysticrenalneoplasmoflowmalignantpotentialaretrospectiveanalysisfordiagnosticperformancestudy AT fuabuduliaizezihali contrastenhancedultrasoundceusvscontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyformultilocularcysticrenalneoplasmoflowmalignantpotentialaretrospectiveanalysisfordiagnosticperformancestudy AT liuningning contrastenhancedultrasoundceusvscontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyformultilocularcysticrenalneoplasmoflowmalignantpotentialaretrospectiveanalysisfordiagnosticperformancestudy AT caiqiliang contrastenhancedultrasoundceusvscontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyformultilocularcysticrenalneoplasmoflowmalignantpotentialaretrospectiveanalysisfordiagnosticperformancestudy AT fuqingfeng contrastenhancedultrasoundceusvscontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyformultilocularcysticrenalneoplasmoflowmalignantpotentialaretrospectiveanalysisfordiagnosticperformancestudy AT liuleyi contrastenhancedultrasoundceusvscontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyformultilocularcysticrenalneoplasmoflowmalignantpotentialaretrospectiveanalysisfordiagnosticperformancestudy AT sunxiaoyu contrastenhancedultrasoundceusvscontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyformultilocularcysticrenalneoplasmoflowmalignantpotentialaretrospectiveanalysisfordiagnosticperformancestudy AT zhangzhihong contrastenhancedultrasoundceusvscontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyformultilocularcysticrenalneoplasmoflowmalignantpotentialaretrospectiveanalysisfordiagnosticperformancestudy |