Cargando…

Point-of-care diagnostic tests for influenza in the emergency department: A cost-effectiveness analysis in a high-risk population from a Canadian perspective

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of novel rapid diagnostic tests: rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDT), digital immunoassays (DIA), rapid nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT), and other treatment algorithms for influenza in high-risk patients presenting to hospita...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mac, Stephen, O’Reilly, Ryan, Adhikari, Neill K. J., Fowler, Robert, Sander, Beate
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7668582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33196653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242255
_version_ 1783610512148267008
author Mac, Stephen
O’Reilly, Ryan
Adhikari, Neill K. J.
Fowler, Robert
Sander, Beate
author_facet Mac, Stephen
O’Reilly, Ryan
Adhikari, Neill K. J.
Fowler, Robert
Sander, Beate
author_sort Mac, Stephen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Our objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of novel rapid diagnostic tests: rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDT), digital immunoassays (DIA), rapid nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT), and other treatment algorithms for influenza in high-risk patients presenting to hospital with influenza-like illness (ILI). METHODS: We developed a decision-analytic model to assess the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic test strategies (RIDT, DIA, NAAT, clinical judgement, batch polymerase chain reaction) preceding treatment; no diagnostic testing and treating everyone; and not treating anyone. We modeled high-risk 65-year old patients from a health payer perspective and accrued outcomes over a patient’s lifetime. We reported health outcomes, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), healthcare costs, and net health benefit (NHB) to measure cost-effectiveness per cohort of 100,000 patients. RESULTS: Treating everyone with no prior testing was the most cost-effective strategy, at a cost-effectiveness threshold of $50,000/QALY, in over 85% of simulations. This strategy yielded the highest NHB of 15.0344 QALYs, but inappropriately treats all patients without influenza. Of the novel rapid diagnostics, NAAT resulted in the highest NHB (15.0277 QALYs), and the least number of deaths (1,571 per 100,000). Sensitivity analyses determined that results were most impacted by the pretest probability of ILI being influenza, diagnostic test sensitivity, and treatment effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our model, treating high-risk patients presenting to hospital with influenza-like illness, without performing a novel rapid diagnostic test, resulted in the highest NHB and was most cost-effective. However, consideration of whether treatment is appropriate in the absence of diagnostic confirmation should be taken into account for decision-making by clinicians and policymakers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7668582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76685822020-11-19 Point-of-care diagnostic tests for influenza in the emergency department: A cost-effectiveness analysis in a high-risk population from a Canadian perspective Mac, Stephen O’Reilly, Ryan Adhikari, Neill K. J. Fowler, Robert Sander, Beate PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Our objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of novel rapid diagnostic tests: rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDT), digital immunoassays (DIA), rapid nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT), and other treatment algorithms for influenza in high-risk patients presenting to hospital with influenza-like illness (ILI). METHODS: We developed a decision-analytic model to assess the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic test strategies (RIDT, DIA, NAAT, clinical judgement, batch polymerase chain reaction) preceding treatment; no diagnostic testing and treating everyone; and not treating anyone. We modeled high-risk 65-year old patients from a health payer perspective and accrued outcomes over a patient’s lifetime. We reported health outcomes, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), healthcare costs, and net health benefit (NHB) to measure cost-effectiveness per cohort of 100,000 patients. RESULTS: Treating everyone with no prior testing was the most cost-effective strategy, at a cost-effectiveness threshold of $50,000/QALY, in over 85% of simulations. This strategy yielded the highest NHB of 15.0344 QALYs, but inappropriately treats all patients without influenza. Of the novel rapid diagnostics, NAAT resulted in the highest NHB (15.0277 QALYs), and the least number of deaths (1,571 per 100,000). Sensitivity analyses determined that results were most impacted by the pretest probability of ILI being influenza, diagnostic test sensitivity, and treatment effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our model, treating high-risk patients presenting to hospital with influenza-like illness, without performing a novel rapid diagnostic test, resulted in the highest NHB and was most cost-effective. However, consideration of whether treatment is appropriate in the absence of diagnostic confirmation should be taken into account for decision-making by clinicians and policymakers. Public Library of Science 2020-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7668582/ /pubmed/33196653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242255 Text en © 2020 Mac et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mac, Stephen
O’Reilly, Ryan
Adhikari, Neill K. J.
Fowler, Robert
Sander, Beate
Point-of-care diagnostic tests for influenza in the emergency department: A cost-effectiveness analysis in a high-risk population from a Canadian perspective
title Point-of-care diagnostic tests for influenza in the emergency department: A cost-effectiveness analysis in a high-risk population from a Canadian perspective
title_full Point-of-care diagnostic tests for influenza in the emergency department: A cost-effectiveness analysis in a high-risk population from a Canadian perspective
title_fullStr Point-of-care diagnostic tests for influenza in the emergency department: A cost-effectiveness analysis in a high-risk population from a Canadian perspective
title_full_unstemmed Point-of-care diagnostic tests for influenza in the emergency department: A cost-effectiveness analysis in a high-risk population from a Canadian perspective
title_short Point-of-care diagnostic tests for influenza in the emergency department: A cost-effectiveness analysis in a high-risk population from a Canadian perspective
title_sort point-of-care diagnostic tests for influenza in the emergency department: a cost-effectiveness analysis in a high-risk population from a canadian perspective
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7668582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33196653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242255
work_keys_str_mv AT macstephen pointofcarediagnostictestsforinfluenzaintheemergencydepartmentacosteffectivenessanalysisinahighriskpopulationfromacanadianperspective
AT oreillyryan pointofcarediagnostictestsforinfluenzaintheemergencydepartmentacosteffectivenessanalysisinahighriskpopulationfromacanadianperspective
AT adhikarineillkj pointofcarediagnostictestsforinfluenzaintheemergencydepartmentacosteffectivenessanalysisinahighriskpopulationfromacanadianperspective
AT fowlerrobert pointofcarediagnostictestsforinfluenzaintheemergencydepartmentacosteffectivenessanalysisinahighriskpopulationfromacanadianperspective
AT sanderbeate pointofcarediagnostictestsforinfluenzaintheemergencydepartmentacosteffectivenessanalysisinahighriskpopulationfromacanadianperspective