Cargando…
A systematic review of risk communication in clinical trials: How does it influence decisions to participate and what are the best methods to improve understanding in a trial context?
BACKGROUND: Effective risk communication is challenging. Ensuring potential trial participants’ understand ‘risk’ information presented to them is a key aspect of the informed consent process within clinical trials, yet minimal research has looked specifically at how to communicate probabilities to...
Autores principales: | Coyle, Maeve, Gillies, Katie |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7668608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33196663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242239 |
Ejemplares similares
-
What, how, when and who of trial results summaries for trial participants: stakeholder-informed guidance from the RECAP project
por: Bruhn, Hanne, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
What influences communication about retention in randomised trials: a multi-trial, theory-based analysis exploring trial staff perspectives
por: Coffey, Taylor, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Making a decision about trial participation: the feasibility of measuring deliberation during the informed consent process for clinical trials
por: Gillies, Katie, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Dissemination of trial results to participants in phase III pragmatic clinical trials: an audit of trial investigators intentions
por: Raza, M Zulfiqar, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Determining items for inclusion in a decision support intervention for clinical trial participation: a modified Delphi approach
por: Gillies, Katie, et al.
Publicado: (2013)