Cargando…

Perioperative Analgesic Modalities for Breast Cancer Surgeries: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE: Various analgesic modalities are adopted for perioperative analgesia in breast cancer surgeries. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of intravenous morphine versus serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in breast cancer surgeries. PATIENTS AND METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elsabeeny, Walaa Y, Shehab, Nahla N, Wadod, Mohamed A, Elkady, Mostafa A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7669532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33209056
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S274808
_version_ 1783610592772227072
author Elsabeeny, Walaa Y
Shehab, Nahla N
Wadod, Mohamed A
Elkady, Mostafa A
author_facet Elsabeeny, Walaa Y
Shehab, Nahla N
Wadod, Mohamed A
Elkady, Mostafa A
author_sort Elsabeeny, Walaa Y
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Various analgesic modalities are adopted for perioperative analgesia in breast cancer surgeries. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of intravenous morphine versus serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in breast cancer surgeries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-five breast cancer patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy from January 2020 to June 2020 were randomly allocated into 3 groups; the morphine group received morphine 0.1 mg/kg, the SAPB group received ultrasound-guided SAPB with 25 mL bupivacaine 0.25% and the ESPB group received ultrasound-guided ESPB with 25 mL bupivacaine 0.25%. A visual analogue scale (VAS) 0–10 was used to evaluate pain postoperatively, where 0 denotes no pain and 10 worst pain. If any patient in the 3 studied groups reported breakthrough pain with VAS ≥ 4 then a bolus of 3 mg morphine was given. RESULTS: There was no difference in VAS scores between the 3 groups postoperatively. Morphine consumption was higher in the morphine group (9.19 ± 2.32 mg) than the SAPB group (4.00 ± 1.55 mg) and the ESPB group (4.20 ± 1.64 mg), respectively. First time to receive postoperative morphine was significantly longer for the ESPB and SAPB groups than the morphine group (20.40 ± 4.98 hours), (19.00 ± 5.9 hours), (5.00 ± 4.62 hours), respectively. Intraoperative hemodynamics and fentanyl consumption showed no difference between groups, whereas postoperative mean arterial blood pressure values at 2 and 4 hours were higher in the morphine group. Ramsay sedation score and postoperative nausea and vomiting values in the post anesthesia care unit were higher for the morphine group compared to the SAPB and ESPB groups. No complications related to the blocks were reported. CONCLUSION: SAPB and ESPB can be used as an effective and safe alternative to opioids with fewer side effects in breast cancer patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was prospectively registered at Clinical Trials.gov on 22 January 2020 with registration number NCT04248608 (https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/SelectProtocol?sid=S0009JS5&selectaction=Edit&uid=U0004LIG&ts=7&cx=−81xkwa).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7669532
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76695322020-11-17 Perioperative Analgesic Modalities for Breast Cancer Surgeries: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Elsabeeny, Walaa Y Shehab, Nahla N Wadod, Mohamed A Elkady, Mostafa A J Pain Res Original Research PURPOSE: Various analgesic modalities are adopted for perioperative analgesia in breast cancer surgeries. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of intravenous morphine versus serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in breast cancer surgeries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-five breast cancer patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy from January 2020 to June 2020 were randomly allocated into 3 groups; the morphine group received morphine 0.1 mg/kg, the SAPB group received ultrasound-guided SAPB with 25 mL bupivacaine 0.25% and the ESPB group received ultrasound-guided ESPB with 25 mL bupivacaine 0.25%. A visual analogue scale (VAS) 0–10 was used to evaluate pain postoperatively, where 0 denotes no pain and 10 worst pain. If any patient in the 3 studied groups reported breakthrough pain with VAS ≥ 4 then a bolus of 3 mg morphine was given. RESULTS: There was no difference in VAS scores between the 3 groups postoperatively. Morphine consumption was higher in the morphine group (9.19 ± 2.32 mg) than the SAPB group (4.00 ± 1.55 mg) and the ESPB group (4.20 ± 1.64 mg), respectively. First time to receive postoperative morphine was significantly longer for the ESPB and SAPB groups than the morphine group (20.40 ± 4.98 hours), (19.00 ± 5.9 hours), (5.00 ± 4.62 hours), respectively. Intraoperative hemodynamics and fentanyl consumption showed no difference between groups, whereas postoperative mean arterial blood pressure values at 2 and 4 hours were higher in the morphine group. Ramsay sedation score and postoperative nausea and vomiting values in the post anesthesia care unit were higher for the morphine group compared to the SAPB and ESPB groups. No complications related to the blocks were reported. CONCLUSION: SAPB and ESPB can be used as an effective and safe alternative to opioids with fewer side effects in breast cancer patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was prospectively registered at Clinical Trials.gov on 22 January 2020 with registration number NCT04248608 (https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/SelectProtocol?sid=S0009JS5&selectaction=Edit&uid=U0004LIG&ts=7&cx=−81xkwa). Dove 2020-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7669532/ /pubmed/33209056 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S274808 Text en © 2020 Elsabeeny et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Elsabeeny, Walaa Y
Shehab, Nahla N
Wadod, Mohamed A
Elkady, Mostafa A
Perioperative Analgesic Modalities for Breast Cancer Surgeries: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
title Perioperative Analgesic Modalities for Breast Cancer Surgeries: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Perioperative Analgesic Modalities for Breast Cancer Surgeries: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Perioperative Analgesic Modalities for Breast Cancer Surgeries: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Perioperative Analgesic Modalities for Breast Cancer Surgeries: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Perioperative Analgesic Modalities for Breast Cancer Surgeries: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort perioperative analgesic modalities for breast cancer surgeries: a prospective randomized controlled trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7669532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33209056
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S274808
work_keys_str_mv AT elsabeenywalaay perioperativeanalgesicmodalitiesforbreastcancersurgeriesaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shehabnahlan perioperativeanalgesicmodalitiesforbreastcancersurgeriesaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wadodmohameda perioperativeanalgesicmodalitiesforbreastcancersurgeriesaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT elkadymostafaa perioperativeanalgesicmodalitiesforbreastcancersurgeriesaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial