Cargando…

Components of one-carbon metabolism and renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: Little is known about the aetiology of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Components of one-carbon (1C) metabolism, which are required for nucleotide synthesis and methylation reactions, may be related to risk of RCC but existing evidence is inconclusive. We conducted a systematic review and indep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clasen, Joanna L., Heath, Alicia K., Scelo, Ghislaine, Muller, David C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7669778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32162043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00394-020-02211-6
_version_ 1783610605764083712
author Clasen, Joanna L.
Heath, Alicia K.
Scelo, Ghislaine
Muller, David C.
author_facet Clasen, Joanna L.
Heath, Alicia K.
Scelo, Ghislaine
Muller, David C.
author_sort Clasen, Joanna L.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Little is known about the aetiology of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Components of one-carbon (1C) metabolism, which are required for nucleotide synthesis and methylation reactions, may be related to risk of RCC but existing evidence is inconclusive. We conducted a systematic review and independent exposure-specific meta-analyses of dietary intake and circulating biomarkers of 1C metabolites and RCC risk. METHODS: Medline and Embase databases were searched for observational studies investigating RCC or kidney cancer incidence or mortality in relation to components of 1C metabolism and 12 eligible articles were included in the meta-analyses. We used Bayesian meta-analyses to estimate summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs) comparing the highest versus lowest categories as well as the between-study heterogeneity. RESULTS: We did not find convincing evidence of an association between any exposure (riboflavin, vitamin B(6), folate, vitamin B(12), methionine, homocysteine, choline, or betaine) and RCC risk. However, vitamin B(6) biomarker status did have a protective (RR = 0.62) but imprecise (95% CrI 0.39–1.14) effect estimate and folate intake had a notable association as well (RR = 0.85, 95% CrI 0.71–1.01). CONCLUSION: There was a lack of precision due largely to the low number of studies. Further investigation is warranted, especially for folate and vitamin B(6), which had consistent suggestive evidence of a protective effect for both dietary intake and biomarker status. A unique strength of this review is the use of Bayesian meta-analyses which allowed for robust estimation of between-study heterogeneity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00394-020-02211-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7669778
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76697782020-11-17 Components of one-carbon metabolism and renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis Clasen, Joanna L. Heath, Alicia K. Scelo, Ghislaine Muller, David C. Eur J Nutr Original Contribution PURPOSE: Little is known about the aetiology of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Components of one-carbon (1C) metabolism, which are required for nucleotide synthesis and methylation reactions, may be related to risk of RCC but existing evidence is inconclusive. We conducted a systematic review and independent exposure-specific meta-analyses of dietary intake and circulating biomarkers of 1C metabolites and RCC risk. METHODS: Medline and Embase databases were searched for observational studies investigating RCC or kidney cancer incidence or mortality in relation to components of 1C metabolism and 12 eligible articles were included in the meta-analyses. We used Bayesian meta-analyses to estimate summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs) comparing the highest versus lowest categories as well as the between-study heterogeneity. RESULTS: We did not find convincing evidence of an association between any exposure (riboflavin, vitamin B(6), folate, vitamin B(12), methionine, homocysteine, choline, or betaine) and RCC risk. However, vitamin B(6) biomarker status did have a protective (RR = 0.62) but imprecise (95% CrI 0.39–1.14) effect estimate and folate intake had a notable association as well (RR = 0.85, 95% CrI 0.71–1.01). CONCLUSION: There was a lack of precision due largely to the low number of studies. Further investigation is warranted, especially for folate and vitamin B(6), which had consistent suggestive evidence of a protective effect for both dietary intake and biomarker status. A unique strength of this review is the use of Bayesian meta-analyses which allowed for robust estimation of between-study heterogeneity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00394-020-02211-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-03-11 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7669778/ /pubmed/32162043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00394-020-02211-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Contribution
Clasen, Joanna L.
Heath, Alicia K.
Scelo, Ghislaine
Muller, David C.
Components of one-carbon metabolism and renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Components of one-carbon metabolism and renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Components of one-carbon metabolism and renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Components of one-carbon metabolism and renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Components of one-carbon metabolism and renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Components of one-carbon metabolism and renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort components of one-carbon metabolism and renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Contribution
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7669778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32162043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00394-020-02211-6
work_keys_str_mv AT clasenjoannal componentsofonecarbonmetabolismandrenalcellcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT heathaliciak componentsofonecarbonmetabolismandrenalcellcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sceloghislaine componentsofonecarbonmetabolismandrenalcellcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mullerdavidc componentsofonecarbonmetabolismandrenalcellcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis