Cargando…
Quality of Life, Sexual Functioning, and Physical Functioning Following Perineal Reconstruction with the Lotus Petal Flap
BACKGROUND: Lotus petal flaps (LPF) may be used for the reconstruction of extralevator abdominoperineal defects that cannot be closed primarily. Limited data are available on how perineal reconstruction with the LPF impacts on patients’ quality of life (QoL), sexual functioning, and physical functio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7669788/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32617757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08771-5 |
_version_ | 1783610608165322752 |
---|---|
author | Hellinga, Joke Stenekes, Martin W. Werker, Paul M. N. Janse, Moniek Fleer, Joke van Etten, Boudewijn |
author_facet | Hellinga, Joke Stenekes, Martin W. Werker, Paul M. N. Janse, Moniek Fleer, Joke van Etten, Boudewijn |
author_sort | Hellinga, Joke |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Lotus petal flaps (LPF) may be used for the reconstruction of extralevator abdominoperineal defects that cannot be closed primarily. Limited data are available on how perineal reconstruction with the LPF impacts on patients’ quality of life (QoL), sexual functioning, and physical functioning. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed following perineal reconstruction with the LPF. The QoL of patients having undergone LPF reconstruction was compared with a control group in which perineal defects were closed without flaps. Sexual and physical functioning (presence of perineal herniation and range of motion [ROM] of the hip joints) could only be evaluated in the LPF group. Psychometrically sound questionnaires were used. Physical functioning was evaluated subjectively with binary questions and objectively by physical examination. RESULTS: Of the 23 patients asked to participate, 15 (65%) completed the questionnaires and 11 (47%) underwent physical examination. In the control group, 16 patients were included. There were no significant differences in QoL between the LPF and control groups. Within the LPF group, 33% of patients were sexually active postoperatively compared with 87% preoperatively. No perineal herniation was found. The ROM of the hip joints was bilaterally smaller compared with the generally accepted values. CONCLUSIONS: Conclusions should be made with care given the small sample size. Despite a supposedly larger resection area in the LPF group, QoL was comparable in both groups. Nonetheless, reconstruction seemed to affect sexual function and physical function, not hampering overall satisfaction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7669788 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76697882020-11-17 Quality of Life, Sexual Functioning, and Physical Functioning Following Perineal Reconstruction with the Lotus Petal Flap Hellinga, Joke Stenekes, Martin W. Werker, Paul M. N. Janse, Moniek Fleer, Joke van Etten, Boudewijn Ann Surg Oncol Reconstructive Oncology BACKGROUND: Lotus petal flaps (LPF) may be used for the reconstruction of extralevator abdominoperineal defects that cannot be closed primarily. Limited data are available on how perineal reconstruction with the LPF impacts on patients’ quality of life (QoL), sexual functioning, and physical functioning. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed following perineal reconstruction with the LPF. The QoL of patients having undergone LPF reconstruction was compared with a control group in which perineal defects were closed without flaps. Sexual and physical functioning (presence of perineal herniation and range of motion [ROM] of the hip joints) could only be evaluated in the LPF group. Psychometrically sound questionnaires were used. Physical functioning was evaluated subjectively with binary questions and objectively by physical examination. RESULTS: Of the 23 patients asked to participate, 15 (65%) completed the questionnaires and 11 (47%) underwent physical examination. In the control group, 16 patients were included. There were no significant differences in QoL between the LPF and control groups. Within the LPF group, 33% of patients were sexually active postoperatively compared with 87% preoperatively. No perineal herniation was found. The ROM of the hip joints was bilaterally smaller compared with the generally accepted values. CONCLUSIONS: Conclusions should be made with care given the small sample size. Despite a supposedly larger resection area in the LPF group, QoL was comparable in both groups. Nonetheless, reconstruction seemed to affect sexual function and physical function, not hampering overall satisfaction. Springer International Publishing 2020-07-02 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7669788/ /pubmed/32617757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08771-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Reconstructive Oncology Hellinga, Joke Stenekes, Martin W. Werker, Paul M. N. Janse, Moniek Fleer, Joke van Etten, Boudewijn Quality of Life, Sexual Functioning, and Physical Functioning Following Perineal Reconstruction with the Lotus Petal Flap |
title | Quality of Life, Sexual Functioning, and Physical Functioning Following Perineal Reconstruction with the Lotus Petal Flap |
title_full | Quality of Life, Sexual Functioning, and Physical Functioning Following Perineal Reconstruction with the Lotus Petal Flap |
title_fullStr | Quality of Life, Sexual Functioning, and Physical Functioning Following Perineal Reconstruction with the Lotus Petal Flap |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality of Life, Sexual Functioning, and Physical Functioning Following Perineal Reconstruction with the Lotus Petal Flap |
title_short | Quality of Life, Sexual Functioning, and Physical Functioning Following Perineal Reconstruction with the Lotus Petal Flap |
title_sort | quality of life, sexual functioning, and physical functioning following perineal reconstruction with the lotus petal flap |
topic | Reconstructive Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7669788/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32617757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08771-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hellingajoke qualityoflifesexualfunctioningandphysicalfunctioningfollowingperinealreconstructionwiththelotuspetalflap AT stenekesmartinw qualityoflifesexualfunctioningandphysicalfunctioningfollowingperinealreconstructionwiththelotuspetalflap AT werkerpaulmn qualityoflifesexualfunctioningandphysicalfunctioningfollowingperinealreconstructionwiththelotuspetalflap AT jansemoniek qualityoflifesexualfunctioningandphysicalfunctioningfollowingperinealreconstructionwiththelotuspetalflap AT fleerjoke qualityoflifesexualfunctioningandphysicalfunctioningfollowingperinealreconstructionwiththelotuspetalflap AT vanettenboudewijn qualityoflifesexualfunctioningandphysicalfunctioningfollowingperinealreconstructionwiththelotuspetalflap |