Cargando…

Quality of Life, Sexual Functioning, and Physical Functioning Following Perineal Reconstruction with the Lotus Petal Flap

BACKGROUND: Lotus petal flaps (LPF) may be used for the reconstruction of extralevator abdominoperineal defects that cannot be closed primarily. Limited data are available on how perineal reconstruction with the LPF impacts on patients’ quality of life (QoL), sexual functioning, and physical functio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hellinga, Joke, Stenekes, Martin W., Werker, Paul M. N., Janse, Moniek, Fleer, Joke, van Etten, Boudewijn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7669788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32617757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08771-5
_version_ 1783610608165322752
author Hellinga, Joke
Stenekes, Martin W.
Werker, Paul M. N.
Janse, Moniek
Fleer, Joke
van Etten, Boudewijn
author_facet Hellinga, Joke
Stenekes, Martin W.
Werker, Paul M. N.
Janse, Moniek
Fleer, Joke
van Etten, Boudewijn
author_sort Hellinga, Joke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lotus petal flaps (LPF) may be used for the reconstruction of extralevator abdominoperineal defects that cannot be closed primarily. Limited data are available on how perineal reconstruction with the LPF impacts on patients’ quality of life (QoL), sexual functioning, and physical functioning. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed following perineal reconstruction with the LPF. The QoL of patients having undergone LPF reconstruction was compared with a control group in which perineal defects were closed without flaps. Sexual and physical functioning (presence of perineal herniation and range of motion [ROM] of the hip joints) could only be evaluated in the LPF group. Psychometrically sound questionnaires were used. Physical functioning was evaluated subjectively with binary questions and objectively by physical examination. RESULTS: Of the 23 patients asked to participate, 15 (65%) completed the questionnaires and 11 (47%) underwent physical examination. In the control group, 16 patients were included. There were no significant differences in QoL between the LPF and control groups. Within the LPF group, 33% of patients were sexually active postoperatively compared with 87% preoperatively. No perineal herniation was found. The ROM of the hip joints was bilaterally smaller compared with the generally accepted values. CONCLUSIONS: Conclusions should be made with care given the small sample size. Despite a supposedly larger resection area in the LPF group, QoL was comparable in both groups. Nonetheless, reconstruction seemed to affect sexual function and physical function, not hampering overall satisfaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7669788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76697882020-11-17 Quality of Life, Sexual Functioning, and Physical Functioning Following Perineal Reconstruction with the Lotus Petal Flap Hellinga, Joke Stenekes, Martin W. Werker, Paul M. N. Janse, Moniek Fleer, Joke van Etten, Boudewijn Ann Surg Oncol Reconstructive Oncology BACKGROUND: Lotus petal flaps (LPF) may be used for the reconstruction of extralevator abdominoperineal defects that cannot be closed primarily. Limited data are available on how perineal reconstruction with the LPF impacts on patients’ quality of life (QoL), sexual functioning, and physical functioning. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed following perineal reconstruction with the LPF. The QoL of patients having undergone LPF reconstruction was compared with a control group in which perineal defects were closed without flaps. Sexual and physical functioning (presence of perineal herniation and range of motion [ROM] of the hip joints) could only be evaluated in the LPF group. Psychometrically sound questionnaires were used. Physical functioning was evaluated subjectively with binary questions and objectively by physical examination. RESULTS: Of the 23 patients asked to participate, 15 (65%) completed the questionnaires and 11 (47%) underwent physical examination. In the control group, 16 patients were included. There were no significant differences in QoL between the LPF and control groups. Within the LPF group, 33% of patients were sexually active postoperatively compared with 87% preoperatively. No perineal herniation was found. The ROM of the hip joints was bilaterally smaller compared with the generally accepted values. CONCLUSIONS: Conclusions should be made with care given the small sample size. Despite a supposedly larger resection area in the LPF group, QoL was comparable in both groups. Nonetheless, reconstruction seemed to affect sexual function and physical function, not hampering overall satisfaction. Springer International Publishing 2020-07-02 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7669788/ /pubmed/32617757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08771-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Reconstructive Oncology
Hellinga, Joke
Stenekes, Martin W.
Werker, Paul M. N.
Janse, Moniek
Fleer, Joke
van Etten, Boudewijn
Quality of Life, Sexual Functioning, and Physical Functioning Following Perineal Reconstruction with the Lotus Petal Flap
title Quality of Life, Sexual Functioning, and Physical Functioning Following Perineal Reconstruction with the Lotus Petal Flap
title_full Quality of Life, Sexual Functioning, and Physical Functioning Following Perineal Reconstruction with the Lotus Petal Flap
title_fullStr Quality of Life, Sexual Functioning, and Physical Functioning Following Perineal Reconstruction with the Lotus Petal Flap
title_full_unstemmed Quality of Life, Sexual Functioning, and Physical Functioning Following Perineal Reconstruction with the Lotus Petal Flap
title_short Quality of Life, Sexual Functioning, and Physical Functioning Following Perineal Reconstruction with the Lotus Petal Flap
title_sort quality of life, sexual functioning, and physical functioning following perineal reconstruction with the lotus petal flap
topic Reconstructive Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7669788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32617757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08771-5
work_keys_str_mv AT hellingajoke qualityoflifesexualfunctioningandphysicalfunctioningfollowingperinealreconstructionwiththelotuspetalflap
AT stenekesmartinw qualityoflifesexualfunctioningandphysicalfunctioningfollowingperinealreconstructionwiththelotuspetalflap
AT werkerpaulmn qualityoflifesexualfunctioningandphysicalfunctioningfollowingperinealreconstructionwiththelotuspetalflap
AT jansemoniek qualityoflifesexualfunctioningandphysicalfunctioningfollowingperinealreconstructionwiththelotuspetalflap
AT fleerjoke qualityoflifesexualfunctioningandphysicalfunctioningfollowingperinealreconstructionwiththelotuspetalflap
AT vanettenboudewijn qualityoflifesexualfunctioningandphysicalfunctioningfollowingperinealreconstructionwiththelotuspetalflap