Cargando…

Mixed-methods evaluation of family medicine research training and peer mentorship in Lesotho

BACKGROUND: Strengthening primary care research capacity is a priority globally. Family medicine training programmes in sub-Saharan Africa represent an important opportunity to build primary care research; however, they are often limited by insufficient research training and mentorship. Peers can be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGuire, Chelsea M., Riffenburg, Kaitlyn, Malope, Sebaka, Jack, Brian, Borba, Christina P.C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AOSIS 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7669944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33181879
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v12i1.2387
_version_ 1783610639580659712
author McGuire, Chelsea M.
Riffenburg, Kaitlyn
Malope, Sebaka
Jack, Brian
Borba, Christina P.C.
author_facet McGuire, Chelsea M.
Riffenburg, Kaitlyn
Malope, Sebaka
Jack, Brian
Borba, Christina P.C.
author_sort McGuire, Chelsea M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Strengthening primary care research capacity is a priority globally. Family medicine training programmes in sub-Saharan Africa represent an important opportunity to build primary care research; however, they are often limited by insufficient research training and mentorship. Peers can be used to extend research mentorship capacity, but have not been evaluated in this context. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate one family medicine training programme’s research capacity building efforts through a blended research curriculum and peer mentorship. SETTING: Lesotho is a landlocked country within South Africa of approximately two million people. The Family Medicine Specialty Training Programme (FMSTP) is the only accredited postgraduate medical education programme in Lesotho. METHODS: This two-year mixed-methods evaluation used: (1) Likert-scale surveys measuring trainee research confidence, (2) written evaluations by trainees, peers, programme faculty and administrators and (3) in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Survey data were analysed using Friedman and sign tests. Interview and written data were analysed thematically via a mixed inductive-deductive approach using Cooke’s framework. RESULTS: Family Medicine Specialty Training Programme trainees (n = 8) experienced moderate increases in research confidence that were statistically significant. Skill-building occurred primarily via experiential learning. Research was grounded in trainees’ clinical practice and locally relevant. A positive research culture was created, promising for sustainability. We identified infrastructure gaps, including funding and protected time. Peer research mentorship supported trainees’ motivation and provided a safe space for questions. CONCLUSION: The FMSTP research curriculum and peer mentorship programme were successful in positively impacting a number of Cooke’s research capacity domains. This evaluation identified improvements that are now being implemented.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7669944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AOSIS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76699442020-11-24 Mixed-methods evaluation of family medicine research training and peer mentorship in Lesotho McGuire, Chelsea M. Riffenburg, Kaitlyn Malope, Sebaka Jack, Brian Borba, Christina P.C. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Strengthening primary care research capacity is a priority globally. Family medicine training programmes in sub-Saharan Africa represent an important opportunity to build primary care research; however, they are often limited by insufficient research training and mentorship. Peers can be used to extend research mentorship capacity, but have not been evaluated in this context. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate one family medicine training programme’s research capacity building efforts through a blended research curriculum and peer mentorship. SETTING: Lesotho is a landlocked country within South Africa of approximately two million people. The Family Medicine Specialty Training Programme (FMSTP) is the only accredited postgraduate medical education programme in Lesotho. METHODS: This two-year mixed-methods evaluation used: (1) Likert-scale surveys measuring trainee research confidence, (2) written evaluations by trainees, peers, programme faculty and administrators and (3) in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Survey data were analysed using Friedman and sign tests. Interview and written data were analysed thematically via a mixed inductive-deductive approach using Cooke’s framework. RESULTS: Family Medicine Specialty Training Programme trainees (n = 8) experienced moderate increases in research confidence that were statistically significant. Skill-building occurred primarily via experiential learning. Research was grounded in trainees’ clinical practice and locally relevant. A positive research culture was created, promising for sustainability. We identified infrastructure gaps, including funding and protected time. Peer research mentorship supported trainees’ motivation and provided a safe space for questions. CONCLUSION: The FMSTP research curriculum and peer mentorship programme were successful in positively impacting a number of Cooke’s research capacity domains. This evaluation identified improvements that are now being implemented. AOSIS 2020-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7669944/ /pubmed/33181879 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v12i1.2387 Text en © 2020. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Original Research
McGuire, Chelsea M.
Riffenburg, Kaitlyn
Malope, Sebaka
Jack, Brian
Borba, Christina P.C.
Mixed-methods evaluation of family medicine research training and peer mentorship in Lesotho
title Mixed-methods evaluation of family medicine research training and peer mentorship in Lesotho
title_full Mixed-methods evaluation of family medicine research training and peer mentorship in Lesotho
title_fullStr Mixed-methods evaluation of family medicine research training and peer mentorship in Lesotho
title_full_unstemmed Mixed-methods evaluation of family medicine research training and peer mentorship in Lesotho
title_short Mixed-methods evaluation of family medicine research training and peer mentorship in Lesotho
title_sort mixed-methods evaluation of family medicine research training and peer mentorship in lesotho
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7669944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33181879
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v12i1.2387
work_keys_str_mv AT mcguirechelseam mixedmethodsevaluationoffamilymedicineresearchtrainingandpeermentorshipinlesotho
AT riffenburgkaitlyn mixedmethodsevaluationoffamilymedicineresearchtrainingandpeermentorshipinlesotho
AT malopesebaka mixedmethodsevaluationoffamilymedicineresearchtrainingandpeermentorshipinlesotho
AT jackbrian mixedmethodsevaluationoffamilymedicineresearchtrainingandpeermentorshipinlesotho
AT borbachristinapc mixedmethodsevaluationoffamilymedicineresearchtrainingandpeermentorshipinlesotho