Cargando…

Impact of percutaneous coronary intervention on patients with impaired baseline renal function

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) frequently co-prevails with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), which could improve post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We sought to evaluate the impact of PCI on post-procedural renal function in patients with impaired baseline serum creatinine (Cr). MET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yadav, Deepti, Sahu, Ankit Kumar, Khanna, Roopali, Goel, Pravin K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7670241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33189194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2020.07.006
_version_ 1783610700771360768
author Yadav, Deepti
Sahu, Ankit Kumar
Khanna, Roopali
Goel, Pravin K.
author_facet Yadav, Deepti
Sahu, Ankit Kumar
Khanna, Roopali
Goel, Pravin K.
author_sort Yadav, Deepti
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) frequently co-prevails with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), which could improve post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We sought to evaluate the impact of PCI on post-procedural renal function in patients with impaired baseline serum creatinine (Cr). METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of 185 patients undergoing PCI with impaired basal serum Cr (≥ 1.5 mg/dl) was done, including 88 (47.5%) patients with recent ACS (≤2 weeks old) in group I and 97 (52.4%) patients in group II (stable angina or ACS >2 weeks old). Patients were classified into worsening or improving renal function based on a corresponding increase or decrease of ≥0.5 mg/dl (ΔCr) in serum Cr 24–48 h post PCI. ΔCr < 0.5 mg/dl was termed as no change. RESULTS: A trend towards improving renal function was seen in the study cohort (mean serum Cr: 2.37 ± 1.25 mg/dl vs 2.28 ± 1.59 mg/dl); (p = 0.09) with decrease in group I from 2.28 ± 1.09 mg/dl to 2.12 ± 1.44 mg/dl (p = 0.03) and in group II from 2.45 ± 1.38 mg/dl to 2.43 ± 1.71 mg/dl (p = 0.81). Post PCI, worsening occurred in 20/185 (10.8%) patients in the total study cohort, 5/88 (5.6%) in group I and 15/97 (15.4%) in group II (p = 0.03). Improvement in serum Cr was seen in 49/185 (26.4%) in the total study cohort, 30/88 (34.1%) in group I and 19/97 (19.6%) patients in group II (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: – Post PCI, only a small proportion of patients with impaired baseline creatinine showed worsening in renal function. Improved renal function was observed in at least one-third of the patients with recent ACS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7670241
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76702412020-11-23 Impact of percutaneous coronary intervention on patients with impaired baseline renal function Yadav, Deepti Sahu, Ankit Kumar Khanna, Roopali Goel, Pravin K. Indian Heart J Original Article BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) frequently co-prevails with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), which could improve post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We sought to evaluate the impact of PCI on post-procedural renal function in patients with impaired baseline serum creatinine (Cr). METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of 185 patients undergoing PCI with impaired basal serum Cr (≥ 1.5 mg/dl) was done, including 88 (47.5%) patients with recent ACS (≤2 weeks old) in group I and 97 (52.4%) patients in group II (stable angina or ACS >2 weeks old). Patients were classified into worsening or improving renal function based on a corresponding increase or decrease of ≥0.5 mg/dl (ΔCr) in serum Cr 24–48 h post PCI. ΔCr < 0.5 mg/dl was termed as no change. RESULTS: A trend towards improving renal function was seen in the study cohort (mean serum Cr: 2.37 ± 1.25 mg/dl vs 2.28 ± 1.59 mg/dl); (p = 0.09) with decrease in group I from 2.28 ± 1.09 mg/dl to 2.12 ± 1.44 mg/dl (p = 0.03) and in group II from 2.45 ± 1.38 mg/dl to 2.43 ± 1.71 mg/dl (p = 0.81). Post PCI, worsening occurred in 20/185 (10.8%) patients in the total study cohort, 5/88 (5.6%) in group I and 15/97 (15.4%) in group II (p = 0.03). Improvement in serum Cr was seen in 49/185 (26.4%) in the total study cohort, 30/88 (34.1%) in group I and 19/97 (19.6%) patients in group II (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: – Post PCI, only a small proportion of patients with impaired baseline creatinine showed worsening in renal function. Improved renal function was observed in at least one-third of the patients with recent ACS. Elsevier 2020 2020-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7670241/ /pubmed/33189194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2020.07.006 Text en © 2020 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Yadav, Deepti
Sahu, Ankit Kumar
Khanna, Roopali
Goel, Pravin K.
Impact of percutaneous coronary intervention on patients with impaired baseline renal function
title Impact of percutaneous coronary intervention on patients with impaired baseline renal function
title_full Impact of percutaneous coronary intervention on patients with impaired baseline renal function
title_fullStr Impact of percutaneous coronary intervention on patients with impaired baseline renal function
title_full_unstemmed Impact of percutaneous coronary intervention on patients with impaired baseline renal function
title_short Impact of percutaneous coronary intervention on patients with impaired baseline renal function
title_sort impact of percutaneous coronary intervention on patients with impaired baseline renal function
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7670241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33189194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2020.07.006
work_keys_str_mv AT yadavdeepti impactofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventiononpatientswithimpairedbaselinerenalfunction
AT sahuankitkumar impactofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventiononpatientswithimpairedbaselinerenalfunction
AT khannaroopali impactofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventiononpatientswithimpairedbaselinerenalfunction
AT goelpravink impactofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventiononpatientswithimpairedbaselinerenalfunction