Cargando…
Foveal crack sign as a predictive biomarker for development of macular hole in fellow eyes of patients with full-thickness macular holes
To investigate the prevalence and predictive value of the foveal crack sign (FCS) in fellow eyes of patients with full-thickness macular holes (FTMH) regarding future macular hole (MH) formation. In a retrospective observational case series, 113 fellow eyes of 113 patients with FTMH have been observ...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7670431/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33199791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77078-y |
_version_ | 1783610736277192704 |
---|---|
author | Furashova, Olga Matthé, Egbert |
author_facet | Furashova, Olga Matthé, Egbert |
author_sort | Furashova, Olga |
collection | PubMed |
description | To investigate the prevalence and predictive value of the foveal crack sign (FCS) in fellow eyes of patients with full-thickness macular holes (FTMH) regarding future macular hole (MH) formation. In a retrospective observational case series, 113 fellow eyes of 113 patients with FTMH have been observed during a mean follow-up time of 21 months. According to baseline SD-OCT images, patients were divided into 4 separate groups: patients with FCS and vitreous adhesion, patients with FCS and vitreous detachment, patients without FCS with vitreous adhesion, patients without FCS with vitreous detachment. Progression rate to MH formation, predictive value of FCS and of vitreous interface status were calculated and compared across the four groups. FCS was observed in 19 of 113 fellow eyes (17%) of patients with FTMH, 10 of them with progression to MH during the mean follow up time of 21 months. 2 other eyes with progression to MH showed no FCS at baseline. Progression rate was shown to be 77% (10 of 13 eyes) in patients with FCS and vitreous adhesion, 0% (none of 6 eyes) in patients with FCS and vitreous detachment, 4% (2 of 48 eyes) in patients without FCS with vitreous adhesion, 0% (none of 46 eyes) in patients without FCS with vitreous detachment. FCS had sensitivity of 83.3% (95% CI 50.9–97.1%) and specificity of 91.1% (95% CI 83.3–95.6%) in predicting MH formation, positive predictive value of FCS was 52.6% (95% CI 29.5–74.8%) and negative predictive value 97.9% (95% CI 91.8–99.6%). Having simultaneously FCS and vitreous adhesion showed 83.3% (95% CI 50.9–97.1%) sensitivity and 97.1% (95% CI 91.1–99.2%) specificity in predicting macular hole formation; positive predictive value was 76.9% (95% CI 46.0–93.8%) and negative predictive value was 98.0% (95% CI 92.4–99.7%). Fellow eyes of patients with FTMH with foveal crack sign are at a very high risk (77%) of FTMH development, as long as posterior vitreous adhesion is present. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7670431 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76704312020-11-18 Foveal crack sign as a predictive biomarker for development of macular hole in fellow eyes of patients with full-thickness macular holes Furashova, Olga Matthé, Egbert Sci Rep Article To investigate the prevalence and predictive value of the foveal crack sign (FCS) in fellow eyes of patients with full-thickness macular holes (FTMH) regarding future macular hole (MH) formation. In a retrospective observational case series, 113 fellow eyes of 113 patients with FTMH have been observed during a mean follow-up time of 21 months. According to baseline SD-OCT images, patients were divided into 4 separate groups: patients with FCS and vitreous adhesion, patients with FCS and vitreous detachment, patients without FCS with vitreous adhesion, patients without FCS with vitreous detachment. Progression rate to MH formation, predictive value of FCS and of vitreous interface status were calculated and compared across the four groups. FCS was observed in 19 of 113 fellow eyes (17%) of patients with FTMH, 10 of them with progression to MH during the mean follow up time of 21 months. 2 other eyes with progression to MH showed no FCS at baseline. Progression rate was shown to be 77% (10 of 13 eyes) in patients with FCS and vitreous adhesion, 0% (none of 6 eyes) in patients with FCS and vitreous detachment, 4% (2 of 48 eyes) in patients without FCS with vitreous adhesion, 0% (none of 46 eyes) in patients without FCS with vitreous detachment. FCS had sensitivity of 83.3% (95% CI 50.9–97.1%) and specificity of 91.1% (95% CI 83.3–95.6%) in predicting MH formation, positive predictive value of FCS was 52.6% (95% CI 29.5–74.8%) and negative predictive value 97.9% (95% CI 91.8–99.6%). Having simultaneously FCS and vitreous adhesion showed 83.3% (95% CI 50.9–97.1%) sensitivity and 97.1% (95% CI 91.1–99.2%) specificity in predicting macular hole formation; positive predictive value was 76.9% (95% CI 46.0–93.8%) and negative predictive value was 98.0% (95% CI 92.4–99.7%). Fellow eyes of patients with FTMH with foveal crack sign are at a very high risk (77%) of FTMH development, as long as posterior vitreous adhesion is present. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7670431/ /pubmed/33199791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77078-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Furashova, Olga Matthé, Egbert Foveal crack sign as a predictive biomarker for development of macular hole in fellow eyes of patients with full-thickness macular holes |
title | Foveal crack sign as a predictive biomarker for development of macular hole in fellow eyes of patients with full-thickness macular holes |
title_full | Foveal crack sign as a predictive biomarker for development of macular hole in fellow eyes of patients with full-thickness macular holes |
title_fullStr | Foveal crack sign as a predictive biomarker for development of macular hole in fellow eyes of patients with full-thickness macular holes |
title_full_unstemmed | Foveal crack sign as a predictive biomarker for development of macular hole in fellow eyes of patients with full-thickness macular holes |
title_short | Foveal crack sign as a predictive biomarker for development of macular hole in fellow eyes of patients with full-thickness macular holes |
title_sort | foveal crack sign as a predictive biomarker for development of macular hole in fellow eyes of patients with full-thickness macular holes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7670431/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33199791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77078-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT furashovaolga fovealcracksignasapredictivebiomarkerfordevelopmentofmacularholeinfelloweyesofpatientswithfullthicknessmacularholes AT mattheegbert fovealcracksignasapredictivebiomarkerfordevelopmentofmacularholeinfelloweyesofpatientswithfullthicknessmacularholes |