Cargando…

Revisiting potential associations between brain morphology, fear acquisition and extinction through new data and a literature review

Inter-individual differences in defensive responding are widely established but their morphological correlates in humans have not been investigated exhaustively. Previous studies reported associations with cortical thickness of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, insula and medial orbitofrontal co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ehlers, Mana R., Nold, Janne, Kuhn, Manuel, Klingelhöfer-Jens, Maren, Lonsdorf, Tina B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7670460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33199738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76683-1
_version_ 1783610742966059008
author Ehlers, Mana R.
Nold, Janne
Kuhn, Manuel
Klingelhöfer-Jens, Maren
Lonsdorf, Tina B.
author_facet Ehlers, Mana R.
Nold, Janne
Kuhn, Manuel
Klingelhöfer-Jens, Maren
Lonsdorf, Tina B.
author_sort Ehlers, Mana R.
collection PubMed
description Inter-individual differences in defensive responding are widely established but their morphological correlates in humans have not been investigated exhaustively. Previous studies reported associations with cortical thickness of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, insula and medial orbitofrontal cortex as well as amygdala volume in fear conditioning studies. However, these associations are partly inconsistent and often derived from small samples. The current study aimed to replicate previously reported associations between physiological and subjective measures of fear acquisition and extinction and brain morphology. Structural magnetic resonance imaging was performed on 107 healthy adults who completed a differential cued fear conditioning paradigm with 24 h delayed extinction while skin conductance response (SCR) and fear ratings were recorded. Cortical thickness and subcortical volume were obtained using the software Freesurfer. Results obtained by traditional null hypothesis significance testing and Bayesians statistics do not support structural brain-behavior relationships: Neither differential SCR nor fear ratings during fear acquisition or extinction training could be predicted by cortical thickness or subcortical volume in regions previously reported. In summary, the current pre-registered study does not corroborate associations between brain morphology and inter-individual differences in defensive responding but differences in experimental design and analyses approaches compared to previous work should be acknowledged.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7670460
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76704602020-11-18 Revisiting potential associations between brain morphology, fear acquisition and extinction through new data and a literature review Ehlers, Mana R. Nold, Janne Kuhn, Manuel Klingelhöfer-Jens, Maren Lonsdorf, Tina B. Sci Rep Article Inter-individual differences in defensive responding are widely established but their morphological correlates in humans have not been investigated exhaustively. Previous studies reported associations with cortical thickness of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, insula and medial orbitofrontal cortex as well as amygdala volume in fear conditioning studies. However, these associations are partly inconsistent and often derived from small samples. The current study aimed to replicate previously reported associations between physiological and subjective measures of fear acquisition and extinction and brain morphology. Structural magnetic resonance imaging was performed on 107 healthy adults who completed a differential cued fear conditioning paradigm with 24 h delayed extinction while skin conductance response (SCR) and fear ratings were recorded. Cortical thickness and subcortical volume were obtained using the software Freesurfer. Results obtained by traditional null hypothesis significance testing and Bayesians statistics do not support structural brain-behavior relationships: Neither differential SCR nor fear ratings during fear acquisition or extinction training could be predicted by cortical thickness or subcortical volume in regions previously reported. In summary, the current pre-registered study does not corroborate associations between brain morphology and inter-individual differences in defensive responding but differences in experimental design and analyses approaches compared to previous work should be acknowledged. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7670460/ /pubmed/33199738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76683-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Ehlers, Mana R.
Nold, Janne
Kuhn, Manuel
Klingelhöfer-Jens, Maren
Lonsdorf, Tina B.
Revisiting potential associations between brain morphology, fear acquisition and extinction through new data and a literature review
title Revisiting potential associations between brain morphology, fear acquisition and extinction through new data and a literature review
title_full Revisiting potential associations between brain morphology, fear acquisition and extinction through new data and a literature review
title_fullStr Revisiting potential associations between brain morphology, fear acquisition and extinction through new data and a literature review
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting potential associations between brain morphology, fear acquisition and extinction through new data and a literature review
title_short Revisiting potential associations between brain morphology, fear acquisition and extinction through new data and a literature review
title_sort revisiting potential associations between brain morphology, fear acquisition and extinction through new data and a literature review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7670460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33199738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76683-1
work_keys_str_mv AT ehlersmanar revisitingpotentialassociationsbetweenbrainmorphologyfearacquisitionandextinctionthroughnewdataandaliteraturereview
AT noldjanne revisitingpotentialassociationsbetweenbrainmorphologyfearacquisitionandextinctionthroughnewdataandaliteraturereview
AT kuhnmanuel revisitingpotentialassociationsbetweenbrainmorphologyfearacquisitionandextinctionthroughnewdataandaliteraturereview
AT klingelhoferjensmaren revisitingpotentialassociationsbetweenbrainmorphologyfearacquisitionandextinctionthroughnewdataandaliteraturereview
AT lonsdorftinab revisitingpotentialassociationsbetweenbrainmorphologyfearacquisitionandextinctionthroughnewdataandaliteraturereview