Cargando…

Too anxious to control: the relation between math anxiety and inhibitory control processes

Based on the attentional control theory, math anxiety has been explained in terms of impaired inhibition, a key cognitive control function associated with the central executive. Inhibition allows us to suppress task-irrelevant interference when needed. Inspired by the Dual Mechanisms of Control theo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van den Bussche, E., Vanmeert, K., Aben, B., Sasanguie, D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7670467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33199798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76920-7
_version_ 1783610744624906240
author Van den Bussche, E.
Vanmeert, K.
Aben, B.
Sasanguie, D.
author_facet Van den Bussche, E.
Vanmeert, K.
Aben, B.
Sasanguie, D.
author_sort Van den Bussche, E.
collection PubMed
description Based on the attentional control theory, math anxiety has been explained in terms of impaired inhibition, a key cognitive control function associated with the central executive. Inhibition allows us to suppress task-irrelevant interference when needed. Inspired by the Dual Mechanisms of Control theory, the current study aimed to disentangle the effect of math anxiety on two cognitive control aspects that can be identified in inhibition. Reactive control occurs after interference is detected and is mostly used in a context where interference is scarce. Proactive control is used to prevent and anticipate interference before it occurs and is preferred in contexts where interference is frequent. We used an arrow flanker task where the proportion of interference was manipulated to stimulate the use of a reactive or proactive control strategy. The results showed that response times on trials containing interference increased with math anxiety, but only in a reactive task context. In a proactive task context response times were not influenced by math anxiety. Our results suggest that math anxiety impairs reactive control. We hypothesize that this finding can be explained by a higher state of distractibility, triggered both by the reactive context and by math anxiety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7670467
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76704672020-11-18 Too anxious to control: the relation between math anxiety and inhibitory control processes Van den Bussche, E. Vanmeert, K. Aben, B. Sasanguie, D. Sci Rep Article Based on the attentional control theory, math anxiety has been explained in terms of impaired inhibition, a key cognitive control function associated with the central executive. Inhibition allows us to suppress task-irrelevant interference when needed. Inspired by the Dual Mechanisms of Control theory, the current study aimed to disentangle the effect of math anxiety on two cognitive control aspects that can be identified in inhibition. Reactive control occurs after interference is detected and is mostly used in a context where interference is scarce. Proactive control is used to prevent and anticipate interference before it occurs and is preferred in contexts where interference is frequent. We used an arrow flanker task where the proportion of interference was manipulated to stimulate the use of a reactive or proactive control strategy. The results showed that response times on trials containing interference increased with math anxiety, but only in a reactive task context. In a proactive task context response times were not influenced by math anxiety. Our results suggest that math anxiety impairs reactive control. We hypothesize that this finding can be explained by a higher state of distractibility, triggered both by the reactive context and by math anxiety. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7670467/ /pubmed/33199798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76920-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Van den Bussche, E.
Vanmeert, K.
Aben, B.
Sasanguie, D.
Too anxious to control: the relation between math anxiety and inhibitory control processes
title Too anxious to control: the relation between math anxiety and inhibitory control processes
title_full Too anxious to control: the relation between math anxiety and inhibitory control processes
title_fullStr Too anxious to control: the relation between math anxiety and inhibitory control processes
title_full_unstemmed Too anxious to control: the relation between math anxiety and inhibitory control processes
title_short Too anxious to control: the relation between math anxiety and inhibitory control processes
title_sort too anxious to control: the relation between math anxiety and inhibitory control processes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7670467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33199798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76920-7
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenbusschee tooanxioustocontroltherelationbetweenmathanxietyandinhibitorycontrolprocesses
AT vanmeertk tooanxioustocontroltherelationbetweenmathanxietyandinhibitorycontrolprocesses
AT abenb tooanxioustocontroltherelationbetweenmathanxietyandinhibitorycontrolprocesses
AT sasanguied tooanxioustocontroltherelationbetweenmathanxietyandinhibitorycontrolprocesses