Cargando…

Novel Biomarkers, ST‐Elevation Resolution, and Clinical Outcomes Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND: Despite restoration of epicardial flow following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), microvascular reperfusion as reflected by ST‐elevation resolution (ST‐ER) resolution remains variable and its pathophysiology remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using principal componen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shavadia, Jay S., Granger, Christopher B., Alemayehu, Wendimagegn, Westerhout, Cynthia M., Povsic, Thomas J., Van Diepen, Sean, Defilippi, Christopher, Armstrong, Paul W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7670520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32552321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.016033
_version_ 1783610755316187136
author Shavadia, Jay S.
Granger, Christopher B.
Alemayehu, Wendimagegn
Westerhout, Cynthia M.
Povsic, Thomas J.
Van Diepen, Sean
Defilippi, Christopher
Armstrong, Paul W.
author_facet Shavadia, Jay S.
Granger, Christopher B.
Alemayehu, Wendimagegn
Westerhout, Cynthia M.
Povsic, Thomas J.
Van Diepen, Sean
Defilippi, Christopher
Armstrong, Paul W.
author_sort Shavadia, Jay S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite restoration of epicardial flow following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), microvascular reperfusion as reflected by ST‐elevation resolution (ST‐ER) resolution remains variable and its pathophysiology remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using principal component analyses, we explored associations between 91 serum biomarkers drawn before PPCI clustered into 14 pathobiologic processes (including NT‐proBNP [N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide] as an independent cluster), and (1) ST‐ER resolution ≥50% versus <50%; and (2) 90‐day composite of death, shock, and heart failure. Network analyses were performed to understand interbiomarker relationships between the ST‐ER groups. Among the 1160 patients studied, 861 (74%) had ST‐ER ≥50% at a median 40 (interquartile range, 23–70) minutes following PPCI, yet both groups had comparable post‐PPCI TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) grade 3 flow (86.6% versus 82.9%; P=0.25). ST‐ER ≥50% was associated with significantly lower pre‐PPCI concentrations of platelet activation cluster (particularly P‐selectin, von Willebrand factor, and platelet‐derived growth factor A) and NT‐proBNP, including after risk adjustment. Across both ST‐ER groups, strong interbiomarker relationships were noted between pathways indicative of myocardial stretch, platelet activation, and inflammation, whereas with ST‐ER <50% correlations between iron homeostasis and inflammation were observed. Of all 14 biomarker clusters, only NT‐proBNP was significantly associated with the 90‐day clinical composite. CONCLUSIONS: Suboptimal ST‐ER is common despite achieving post‐PPCI TIMI grade 3 flow. The cluster of platelet activation proteins and NT‐proBNP were strongly correlated with suboptimal ST‐ER and NT‐proBNP was independently associated with 90‐day outcomes. This analysis provides insights into the pathophysiology of microvascular reperfusion in ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction and suggests novel pre‐PPCI risk targets potentially amenable to enhancing tissue‐level reperfusion following PPCI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7670520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76705202020-11-23 Novel Biomarkers, ST‐Elevation Resolution, and Clinical Outcomes Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Shavadia, Jay S. Granger, Christopher B. Alemayehu, Wendimagegn Westerhout, Cynthia M. Povsic, Thomas J. Van Diepen, Sean Defilippi, Christopher Armstrong, Paul W. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Despite restoration of epicardial flow following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), microvascular reperfusion as reflected by ST‐elevation resolution (ST‐ER) resolution remains variable and its pathophysiology remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using principal component analyses, we explored associations between 91 serum biomarkers drawn before PPCI clustered into 14 pathobiologic processes (including NT‐proBNP [N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide] as an independent cluster), and (1) ST‐ER resolution ≥50% versus <50%; and (2) 90‐day composite of death, shock, and heart failure. Network analyses were performed to understand interbiomarker relationships between the ST‐ER groups. Among the 1160 patients studied, 861 (74%) had ST‐ER ≥50% at a median 40 (interquartile range, 23–70) minutes following PPCI, yet both groups had comparable post‐PPCI TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) grade 3 flow (86.6% versus 82.9%; P=0.25). ST‐ER ≥50% was associated with significantly lower pre‐PPCI concentrations of platelet activation cluster (particularly P‐selectin, von Willebrand factor, and platelet‐derived growth factor A) and NT‐proBNP, including after risk adjustment. Across both ST‐ER groups, strong interbiomarker relationships were noted between pathways indicative of myocardial stretch, platelet activation, and inflammation, whereas with ST‐ER <50% correlations between iron homeostasis and inflammation were observed. Of all 14 biomarker clusters, only NT‐proBNP was significantly associated with the 90‐day clinical composite. CONCLUSIONS: Suboptimal ST‐ER is common despite achieving post‐PPCI TIMI grade 3 flow. The cluster of platelet activation proteins and NT‐proBNP were strongly correlated with suboptimal ST‐ER and NT‐proBNP was independently associated with 90‐day outcomes. This analysis provides insights into the pathophysiology of microvascular reperfusion in ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction and suggests novel pre‐PPCI risk targets potentially amenable to enhancing tissue‐level reperfusion following PPCI. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7670520/ /pubmed/32552321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.016033 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Shavadia, Jay S.
Granger, Christopher B.
Alemayehu, Wendimagegn
Westerhout, Cynthia M.
Povsic, Thomas J.
Van Diepen, Sean
Defilippi, Christopher
Armstrong, Paul W.
Novel Biomarkers, ST‐Elevation Resolution, and Clinical Outcomes Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title Novel Biomarkers, ST‐Elevation Resolution, and Clinical Outcomes Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_full Novel Biomarkers, ST‐Elevation Resolution, and Clinical Outcomes Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_fullStr Novel Biomarkers, ST‐Elevation Resolution, and Clinical Outcomes Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_full_unstemmed Novel Biomarkers, ST‐Elevation Resolution, and Clinical Outcomes Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_short Novel Biomarkers, ST‐Elevation Resolution, and Clinical Outcomes Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_sort novel biomarkers, st‐elevation resolution, and clinical outcomes following primary percutaneous coronary intervention
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7670520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32552321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.016033
work_keys_str_mv AT shavadiajays novelbiomarkersstelevationresolutionandclinicaloutcomesfollowingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT grangerchristopherb novelbiomarkersstelevationresolutionandclinicaloutcomesfollowingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT alemayehuwendimagegn novelbiomarkersstelevationresolutionandclinicaloutcomesfollowingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT westerhoutcynthiam novelbiomarkersstelevationresolutionandclinicaloutcomesfollowingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT povsicthomasj novelbiomarkersstelevationresolutionandclinicaloutcomesfollowingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT vandiepensean novelbiomarkersstelevationresolutionandclinicaloutcomesfollowingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT defilippichristopher novelbiomarkersstelevationresolutionandclinicaloutcomesfollowingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT armstrongpaulw novelbiomarkersstelevationresolutionandclinicaloutcomesfollowingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryintervention